Shota Tohoku1, Stefano Bordignon1, Shaojie Chen2, Fabrizio Bologna1, Lukas Urbanek1, Felix Operhalski3, Kr Julian Chun2, Boris Schmidt4. 1. Cardiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus-Krankenhaus, Wilhelm-Epstein Str. 4, Frankfurt 60431, Germany. 2. Cardiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus-Krankenhaus, Wilhelm-Epstein Str. 4, Frankfurt 60431, Germany; Die Sektion Medizin, Universität zu Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany. 3. Medizinische Klinik 3- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. 4. Cardiologisches Centrum Bethanien, Agaplesion Markus-Krankenhaus, Wilhelm-Epstein Str. 4, Frankfurt 60431, Germany; Medizinische Klinik 3- Klinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: b.schmidt@ccb.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The second- and third-generation endoscopic ablation systems (EAS2 and EAS3) have been launched in recent years. We aimed to assess the lesion durability as well as gap localization using the multigenerational novel technologies in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent second ablation for recurrent AF following the initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with EAS2 or EAS3 were retrospectively investigated. The persistent durability of PVI, gap localization at the second procedure, and procedural/anatomical features of durable PVI were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 225 patients treated with EAS3 (N = 125) and EAS2 (N = 100), 34 patients (EAS3: 13 patients, 50 PVs, EAS2: 21 patients, 82 PVs) underwent a second procedure because of recurrent AF mean 11.9 ± 9.3 months after the initial procedure. Persistent isolation of all four PVs was recorded in 6 (46.2%) patients in EAS3 group and 4 (19.1%) patients in EAS2 group (p = 0.130). Ninety-one out of 132 (68.9%) PVs were persistently isolated with a higher rate in EAS3 group (82.0% vs. EAS2 group: 61.0%, p = 0.0113). A total of 45 gaps were recorded in 41 PVs. Right superior PV (RSPV) was the predominantly common reconnected vein (15 gaps, 14 PVs) irrespective of generations (EAS3: 4 gaps in 3 PVs and EAS2: 12 gaps in 11 PVs). Logistic multivariate regression analysis revealed ablation without reduced energy dose (5.5-7 W) as an independent predictor of durable PVI [adjusted OR: 3.70, 95% CI (1.408-10.003)], p = 0.008]. CONCLUSION: The technical innovation resulted in a higher lesion durability in EAS3-guided PVI in patients with recurrent AF. The most common gap location was found at RSPV in successor EASs. Ablation without reduced energy was a predictor of durable PVI in successor EASs.
BACKGROUND: The second- and third-generation endoscopic ablation systems (EAS2 and EAS3) have been launched in recent years. We aimed to assess the lesion durability as well as gap localization using the multigenerational novel technologies in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent second ablation for recurrent AF following the initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with EAS2 or EAS3 were retrospectively investigated. The persistent durability of PVI, gap localization at the second procedure, and procedural/anatomical features of durable PVI were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 225 patients treated with EAS3 (N = 125) and EAS2 (N = 100), 34 patients (EAS3: 13 patients, 50 PVs, EAS2: 21 patients, 82 PVs) underwent a second procedure because of recurrent AF mean 11.9 ± 9.3 months after the initial procedure. Persistent isolation of all four PVs was recorded in 6 (46.2%) patients in EAS3 group and 4 (19.1%) patients in EAS2 group (p = 0.130). Ninety-one out of 132 (68.9%) PVs were persistently isolated with a higher rate in EAS3 group (82.0% vs. EAS2 group: 61.0%, p = 0.0113). A total of 45 gaps were recorded in 41 PVs. Right superior PV (RSPV) was the predominantly common reconnected vein (15 gaps, 14 PVs) irrespective of generations (EAS3: 4 gaps in 3 PVs and EAS2: 12 gaps in 11 PVs). Logistic multivariate regression analysis revealed ablation without reduced energy dose (5.5-7 W) as an independent predictor of durable PVI [adjusted OR: 3.70, 95% CI (1.408-10.003)], p = 0.008]. CONCLUSION: The technical innovation resulted in a higher lesion durability in EAS3-guided PVI in patients with recurrent AF. The most common gap location was found at RSPV in successor EASs. Ablation without reduced energy was a predictor of durable PVI in successor EASs.