| Literature DB >> 34332661 |
Thomas G Middour1, John H Chen1, Mikhael F El-Chami2.
Abstract
Leadless pacemakers (LPs) have revolutionized the field of pacing by miniaturizing pacemakers and rendering them completelty intracardiac, hence reducing complications related to pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads. However, first generation LPs appear to be associated with a higher rate of myocardial perforation as compared to transvenous pacemakers (TV-PPM). Currently, LPs are predominantly designed to pace the right ventricle with no LPs that provide atrial or biventricular pacing. In this article, we review the available data on LPs while advocating for the need for a randomized controlled trial comparing LPs to TV-PPMs. In addition, we review the future directions of leadless devices.Entities:
Keywords: Leadless extraction; Leadless pacemaker; Micra; Nanostim
Year: 2021 PMID: 34332661 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Cardiovasc Dis ISSN: 0033-0620 Impact factor: 8.194