Literature DB >> 34331842

Efficiency of a boost with a third dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA-based vaccines in solid organ transplant recipients.

Arnaud Del Bello1,2,3, Florence Abravanel2,3,4, Olivier Marion1,2,3, Chloé Couat1, Laure Esposito1, Laurence Lavayssière1, Jacques Izopet2,3,4, Nassim Kamar1,2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical research/practice; immunosuppression/immune modulation; infection and infectious agents - viral; infectious disease; vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34331842      PMCID: PMC8441706          DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   9.369


× No keyword cloud information.

DISCLOSURE

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the American Journal of Transplantation. A weak humoral response to two‐doses of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine was observed in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. , Preliminary reports suggested the usefulness of a boost with a third dose. , Herein, we report the humoral response in 396 SOT patients (mean age 59 ± 15 years, 65% men) who were given three doses messenger RNA‐based vaccine (BNT162b2 vaccine [Pfizer‐BioNTech]) (Table S1). Of these, 101 were included in our previous report. The two first doses were given one month apart, and the third dose was administered 59 (IQR25‐75: 47–67) days after the second dose, that is, once the third dose was recommended by the French National Authority for Health. Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein total antibodies were assessed the day of vaccination before the injection using either the Wantai enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay test (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise) (228 patients, 57.6%), or another anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 spike protein assay (n = 168) (Table S2). According to French law (loi Jardé), anonymous retrospective studies do not require institutional review board approval. The prevalence of anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.2% to 2.4%; n = 5) before the first injection, 5.1% (95% CI, 3.0% to 7.4%; n = 20) before the second one, 41.4% (95% CI, 36.5% to 46.3%; n = 164) before the third one, and 67.9% (95% CI, 63.3% to 72.6%; n = 269) 4 weeks after the third dose, p < .0001 (Figure 1A). Among the 232 patients who were seronegative before the third dose, 105 (45.25%) turned positive. All patients who were seropositive before the third dose were still seropositive 4 weeks later.
FIGURE 1

(A) Anti‐severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies before and after vaccination in patients tested with different assays. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. ****p < .0001. (B) Anti‐severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies before and after vaccination in patients tested with the Wantai enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay test. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. ****p < .0001. (C) Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies titers before and after vaccination in patients who were tested with the Wantai test and who had no detectable antibodies titers before the third dose. A positive test using the Wantai assay was defined by a signal‐to‐cut‐off ratio (S/CO) >1.1. ****p < .0001. (D) Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody titers before and after vaccination in patients who were tested with the Wantai test and who had detectable antibodies titers before the third dose. Results are expressed as means ± SD. A positive test using the Wantai assay was defined by a S/CO >1.1. ***p = .004. **p = .017 [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

(A) Anti‐severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies before and after vaccination in patients tested with different assays. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. ****p < .0001. (B) Anti‐severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) antibodies before and after vaccination in patients tested with the Wantai enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay test. Results are expressed as means ± SEM. ****p < .0001. (C) Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibodies titers before and after vaccination in patients who were tested with the Wantai test and who had no detectable antibodies titers before the third dose. A positive test using the Wantai assay was defined by a signal‐to‐cut‐off ratio (S/CO) >1.1. ****p < .0001. (D) Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody titers before and after vaccination in patients who were tested with the Wantai test and who had detectable antibodies titers before the third dose. Results are expressed as means ± SD. A positive test using the Wantai assay was defined by a S/CO >1.1. ***p = .004. **p = .017 [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com] By means of multivariate analysis (Table S3), younger patients (OR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.93–0.97], p < .0001) had a higher seroconversion rate, whereas patients receiving mycophenolic acid (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.14–0.54], p = .0002) or belatacept (OR = 0.14, 95% CI [0.43–0.46], p = .001), and patients that received at least a triple immunosuppression (OR = 0.42, 95% CI [0.21–0.86], p = .02) presented a lower seroconversion rate. After three doses, the seroconversion rate remained low in patients given belatacept with (5/16 [31%]) or without (3/9 [33%]) mycophenolic acid. In the subgroup of patients tested with the Wantai test (n = 228), the seroconversion rate increased from 43.4% before the third dose to 69.3% one month later (Figure 1B). In this homogenous subgroup, antibodies titers were assessed and dramatically increased in patients who were seronegative (Figure 1C) or seropositive (Figure 1D) before the third dose. The increase and median titers were higher in seropositive than seronegative patients. No serious adverse event or acute rejection episode was observed after the administration of the third dose. In conclusion, this study confirmed that giving a third vaccine dose to SOT patients increases the humoral response and antibodies titers. Assessing the neutralizing antibodies’ prevalence and for how long antibodies will persist in SOT are required. Analysis of cell‐mediated immunity is also necessary to comprehensively assess the increase on vaccine immunogenicity. Meanwhile, barriers measures should be maintained. Supplementary Material Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 vaccine in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Smaragdi Marinaki; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Dimitrios Degiannis; Sotirios Roussos; Ioanna D Pavlopoulou; Angelos Hatzakis; Ioannis N Boletis
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 9.369

2.  Safety and Immunogenicity of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplants.

Authors:  Olivier Marion; Arnaud Del Bello; Florence Abravanel; Chloé Couat; Stanislas Faguer; Laure Esposito; Anne Laure Hebral; Jacques Izopet; Nassim Kamar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Safety and Immunogenicity of a Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Case Series.

Authors:  William A Werbel; Brian J Boyarsky; Michael T Ou; Allan B Massie; Aaron A R Tobian; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Three Doses of an mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Nassim Kamar; Florence Abravanel; Olivier Marion; Chloé Couat; Jacques Izopet; Arnaud Del Bello
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Clinical performance of a rapid test compared to a microplate test to detect total anti SARS-CoV-2 antibodies directed to the spike protein.

Authors:  Florence Abravanel; Marcel Miédouge; Sabine Chapuy-Regaud; Jean-Michel Mansuy; Jacques Izopet
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.168

  5 in total
  60 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 on the liver and on the care of patients with chronic liver disease, hepatobiliary cancer, and liver transplantation: An updated EASL position paper.

Authors:  Thomas Marjot; Christiane S Eberhardt; Tobias Boettler; Luca S Belli; Marina Berenguer; Maria Buti; Rajiv Jalan; Mario U Mondelli; Richard Moreau; Daniel Shouval; Thomas Berg; Markus Cornberg
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 30.083

Review 2.  A Review of Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Following Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Ilona Cieślak; Magdalena Kwapisz; Olga Tronina; Joanna Gotlib; Wojciech Lisik; Dariusz Wasiak; Marta Hreńczuk; Mansur Rahnama; Piotr Małkowski
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 3.  Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Chiara Cantarelli; Andrea Angeletti; Laura Perin; Luis Sanchez Russo; Gianmarco Sabiu; Manuel Alfredo Podestà; Paolo Cravedi
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2022-07-27

Review 4.  Immunosuppressed non-responders to two doses of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines achieve an immune response comparable to those of immunocompetent individuals after a third dose.

Authors:  Andrew N Margioris
Journal:  Hormones (Athens)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.419

5.  Effect of a Third Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 Vaccine on Humoral and Cellular Responses and Serum Anti-HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Irene Cassaniti; Marilena Gregorini; Federica Bergami; Francesca Arena; Josè Camilla Sammartino; Elena Percivalle; Ehsan Soleymaninejadian; Massimo Abelli; Elena Ticozzelli; Angela Nocco; Francesca Minero; Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri; Daniele Lilleri; Teresa Rampino; Fausto Baldanti
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Omicron breakthrough infection in a kidney-transplant patient given pre-exposition casirivimab and imdevimab monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nassim Kamar; Anna Gouin; Jacques Izopet
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  Immunogenicity and Risk Factors Associated With Poor Humoral Immune Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Recipients of Solid Organ Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kasama Manothummetha; Nipat Chuleerarux; Anawin Sanguankeo; Olivia S Kates; Nattiya Hirankarn; Achitpol Thongkam; M Veronica Dioverti-Prono; Pattama Torvorapanit; Nattapong Langsiri; Navaporn Worasilchai; Chatphatai Moonla; Rongpong Plongla; William M Garneau; Ariya Chindamporn; Pitchaphon Nissaisorakarn; Tany Thaniyavarn; Saman Nematollahi; Nitipong Permpalung
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Predictive Factors for Humoral Response After 2-dose SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Olivier Marion; Arnaud Del Bello; Florence Abravanel; Stanislas Faguer; Laure Esposito; Anne Laure Hebral; Julie Bellière; Jacques Izopet; Nassim Kamar
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2021-12-23

9.  Humoral Immune Response following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Lea Timmermann; Brigitta Globke; Georg Lurje; Moritz Schmelzle; Wenzel Schöning; Robert Öllinger; Johann Pratschke; Bettina Eberspächer; Christian Drosten; Jörg Hofmann; Dennis Eurich
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01

10.  Immune Response After a Third Dose of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Liver Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Aitor Odriozola; Patricia Lamadrid-Perojo; Antonio Cuadrado; David San Segundo; María Del Barrio; José Ignacio Fortea; Angela Puente; Lidia Amigo; Roberto Fernández-Santiago; Federico Castillo; María Achalandabaso; Juan Andrés Echeverri; Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Sanjuan; Marcos López-Hoyos; Javier Crespo; Emilio Fábrega
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.385

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.