Literature DB >> 34331766

Phase 3 Trials of Enhanced Versus Usual Care Physical Therapy for Patients at Risk of Poor Outcome Following Knee Arthroplasty: A Perspective on Meaning and a Way Forward.

Daniel L Riddle1, David F Hamilton2, Levent Dumenci3, David J Beard4.   

Abstract

Physical therapy is routinely delivered to patients after discharge from the hospital following knee arthroplasty. Posthospitalization physical therapy is thought to be beneficial, particularly for those patients most at risk of poor outcome, the subgroup with persistent function-limiting pain, despite an apparently successful surgery. Research teams have undertaken 3 large-scale multicenter Phase 3 randomized clinical trials designed specifically for patients at risk of poor outcome following knee arthroplasty. All 3 trials screened for poor outcome risk using different methods and investigated different physical therapist interventions delivered in different ways. Despite the variety of types of physical therapy and mode of delivery, all trials found no effects of the enhanced treatment compared with usual care. In all cases, usual care required a lower dosage of physical therapy compared with the enhanced interventions. This Perspective compares and contrasts the 3 trials, speculates on factors that could explain the no-effect findings, and proposes areas for future study designed to benefit the poor outcome phenotype.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Physical Therapy Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthritis; Arthroplasty; Chronic Pain; Knee Arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34331766      PMCID: PMC8565332          DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzab186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Ther        ISSN: 0031-9023


  35 in total

1.  Latent Class Growth Analysis predicts long term pain and function trajectories in total knee arthroplasty: a study of 689 patients.

Authors:  M M Dowsey; A J Smith; P F M Choong
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Impact of the economic downturn on total joint replacement demand in the United States: updated projections to 2021.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Kevin L Ong; Edmund Lau; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Variations in pain and function before and after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between Swedish and Australian cohorts.

Authors:  M M Dowsey; O Robertsson; M Sundberg; L S Lohmander; P F M Choong; A W-Dahl
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 4.  Rehabilitation protocols following total knee arthroplasty: a review of study designs and outcome measures.

Authors:  Iciar M Dávila Castrodad; Thea M Recai; Megha M Abraham; Jennifer I Etcheson; Nequesha S Mohamed; Armin Edalatpour; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

5.  Model-based pain and function outcome trajectory types for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty: a secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  L Dumenci; R A Perera; F J Keefe; D C Ang; J Slover; M P Jensen; D L Riddle
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.576

6.  Psychological determinants of problematic outcomes following Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan; Michael Tanzer; William Stanish; Michel Fallaha; Francis J Keefe; Maureen Simmonds; Michael Dunbar
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 6.961

7.  What proportion of patients report long-term pain after total hip or knee replacement for osteoarthritis? A systematic review of prospective studies in unselected patients.

Authors:  Andrew David Beswick; Vikki Wylde; Rachael Gooberman-Hill; Ashley Blom; Paul Dieppe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  COmmunity-based Rehabilitation after Knee Arthroplasty (CORKA): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Karen L Barker; David Beard; Andrew Price; Francine Toye; Martin Underwood; Avril Drummond; Gary Collins; Susan Dutton; Helen Campbell; Nicola Kenealy; Jon Room; Sarah E Lamb
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Clinical- and cost-effectiveness of the STAR care pathway compared to usual care for patients with chronic pain after total knee replacement: study protocol for a UK randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vikki Wylde; Wendy Bertram; Andrew D Beswick; Ashley W Blom; Julie Bruce; Amanda Burston; Jane Dennis; Kirsty Garfield; Nicholas Howells; Athene Lane; Candy McCabe; Andrew J Moore; Sian Noble; Tim J Peters; Andrew Price; Emily Sanderson; Andrew D Toms; David A Walsh; Simon White; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.