Literature DB >> 34331664

IRF4 and IRF8 expression are associated with clinical phenotype and clinico-hematological response to hydroxyurea in essential thrombocythemia.

Xiao Huang1, Tingting Ma1, Yongmei Zhu1, Bo Jiao1, Shanhe Yu1, Kankan Wang2, Jian-Qing Mi3, Ruibao Ren4.   

Abstract

The morbidity and mortality of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are primarily caused by arterial and venous complications, progression to myelofibrosis, and transformation to acute leukemia. However, identifying molecular-based biomarkers for risk stratification of patients with MPNs remains a challenge. We have previously shown that interferon regulatory factor-8 (IRF8) and IRF4 serve as tumor suppressors in myeloid cells. In this study, we evaluated the expression of IRF4 and IRF8 and the JAK2V617F mutant allele burden in patients with MPNs. Patients with decreased IRF4 expression were correlated with a more developed MPN phenotype in myelofibrosis (MF) and secondary AML (sAML) transformed from MPNs versus essential thrombocythemia (ET). Negative correlations between the JAK2V617F allele burden and the expression of IRF8 (P < 0.05) and IRF4 (P < 0.001) and between white blood cell (WBC) count and IRF4 expression (P < 0.05) were found in ET patients. IRF8 expression was negatively correlated with the JAK2V617F allele burden (P < 0.05) in polycythemia vera patients. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR) were observed in 67.5%,10%, and 22.5% of ET patients treated with hydroxyurea (HU), respectively, in 12 months. At 3 months, patients in the CR group showed high IRF4 and IRF8 expression compared with patients in the PR and NR groups. In the 12-month therapy period, low IRF4 and IRF8 expression were independently associated with the unfavorable response to HU and high WBC count. Our data indicate that the expression of IRF4 and IRF8 was associated with the MPN phenotype, which may serve as biomarkers for the response to HU in ET.
© 2021. Higher Education Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IRF4; IRF8; essential thrombocythemia; hydroxyurea; myeloproliferative neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34331664     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0858-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   9.927


  58 in total

Review 1.  Myeloproliferative neoplasms: molecular pathophysiology, essential clinical understanding, and treatment strategies.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; William Vainchenker
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Perspectives on the increased risk of second cancer in patients with essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Hans Carl Hasselbalch
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.

Authors:  Jerry L Spivak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Molecular insights into regulation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Olli Silvennoinen; Stevan R Hubbard
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Second malignancies in hydroxyurea and interferon-treated Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Iben Onsberg Hansen; Anders Lindholm Sørensen; Hans Carl Hasselbalch
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Acquired mutation of the tyrosine kinase JAK2 in human myeloproliferative disorders.

Authors:  E Joanna Baxter; Linda M Scott; Peter J Campbell; Clare East; Nasios Fourouclas; Soheila Swanton; George S Vassiliou; Anthony J Bench; Elaine M Boyd; Natasha Curtin; Mike A Scott; Wendy N Erber; Anthony R Green
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Mar 19-25       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  JAK-STAT signaling in the therapeutic landscape of myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Jennifer M O'Sullivan; Claire N Harrison
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.102

8.  Leukocytosis as a major thrombotic risk factor in patients with polycythemia vera.

Authors:  Raffaele Landolfi; Leonardo Di Gennaro; Tiziano Barbui; Valerio De Stefano; Guido Finazzi; Rosamaria Marfisi; Gianni Tognoni; Roberto Marchioli
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Thrombotic complications of myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk assessment and risk-guided management.

Authors:  A Casini; P Fontana; T P Lecompte
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.824

Review 10.  Thrombosis in myeloproliferative disorders: prevalence, prognostic factors, and the role of leukocytes and JAK2V617F.

Authors:  Ayalew Tefferi; Michelle Elliott
Journal:  Semin Thromb Hemost       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.180

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prognostic characteristics of immune subtypes associated with acute myeloid leukemia and their identification in cell subsets based on single-cell sequencing analysis.

Authors:  Jie Lu; Guowei Zheng; Ani Dong; Xinyu Chang; Xiting Cao; Mengying Liu; Xuezhong Shi; Chunmei Wang; Yongli Yang; Xiaocan Jia
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-09-23

2.  IRF4 expression is low in Philadelphia negative myeloproliferative neoplasms and is associated with a worse prognosis.

Authors:  Cosimo Cumbo; Francesco Tarantini; Luisa Anelli; Antonella Zagaria; Immacolata Redavid; Crescenzio Francesco Minervini; Nicoletta Coccaro; Giuseppina Tota; Alessandra Ricco; Elisa Parciante; Maria Rosa Conserva; Giorgina Specchia; Pellegrino Musto; Francesco Albano
Journal:  Exp Hematol Oncol       Date:  2021-12-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.