Literature DB >> 34331268

Multiple prosodic meanings are conveyed through separate pitch ranges: Evidence from perception of focus and surprise in Mandarin Chinese.

Xiaoluan Liu1,2,3,4, Yi Xu5, Wenjia Zhang6, Xing Tian7,8.   

Abstract

F0 variation is a crucial feature in speech prosody, which can convey linguistic information such as focus and paralinguistic meanings such as surprise. How can multiple layers of information be represented with F0 in speech: are they divided into discrete layers of pitch or overlapped without clear divisions? We investigated this question by assessing pitch perception of focus and surprise in Mandarin Chinese. Seventeen native Mandarin listeners rated the strength of focus and surprise conveyed by the same set of synthetically manipulated sentences. An fMRI experiment was conducted to assess neural correlates of the listeners' perceptual response to the stimuli. The results showed that behaviourally, the perceptual threshold for focus was 3 semitones and that for surprise was 5 semitones above the baseline. Moreover, the pitch range of 5-12 semitones above the baseline signalled both focus and surprise, suggesting a considerable overlap between the two types of prosodic information within this range. The neuroimaging data positively correlated with the variations in behavioural data. Also, a ceiling effect was found as no significant behavioural differences or neural activities were shown after reaching a certain pitch level for the perception of focus and surprise respectively. Together, the results suggest that different layers of prosodic information are represented in F0 through different pitch ranges: paralinguistic information is represented at a pitch range beyond that used by linguistic information. Meanwhile, the representation of paralinguistic information is achieved without obscuring linguistic prosody, thus allowing F0 to represent the two layers of information in parallel.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Keywords:  Focus; Mandarin; Parallel representation; Pitch; Surprise

Year:  2021        PMID: 34331268     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-021-00930-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  29 in total

1.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  P Belin; R J Zatorre; P Lafaille; P Ahad; B Pike
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Recognition of emotional prosody and verbal components of spoken language: an fMRI study.

Authors:  T W Buchanan; K Lutz; S Mirzazade; K Specht; N J Shah; K Zilles; L Jäncke
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-06

3.  Updating working memory for words: a PET activation study.

Authors:  C R Clark; G F Egan; A C McFarlane; P Morris; D Weber; C Sonkkilla; J Marcina; H J Tochon-Danguy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Convergence of semantics and emotional expression within the IFG pars orbitalis.

Authors:  Michel Belyk; Steven Brown; Jessica Lim; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Perception of affective and linguistic prosody: an ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Michel Belyk; Steven Brown
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody.

Authors:  Thomas Ethofer; Benjamin Kreifelts; Sarah Wiethoff; Jonathan Wolf; Wolfgang Grodd; Patrik Vuilleumier; Dirk Wildgruber
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: a literature review.

Authors:  A Cutler; D Dahan; W van Donselaar
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Physiological and acoustic correlates of perceived stress.

Authors:  T Gay
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1978 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  A new method of investigating the perception of prosodic features.

Authors:  I Fonagy
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1978 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.500

Review 10.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension.

Authors:  Nina F Dronkers; David P Wilkins; Robert D Van Valin; Brenda B Redfern; Jeri J Jaeger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun
View more
  1 in total

1.  The interaction of focus and phrasing with downstep and post-low-bouncing in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Bei Wang; Frank Kügler; Susanne Genzel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.