Literature DB >> 34330880

Days alive and at home after hip fracture: a cross-sectional validation of a patient-centred outcome measure using routinely collected data.

Daniel I McIsaac1,2, Robert Talarico2,3, Angela Jerath4, Duminda N Wijeysundera4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Days alive and at home (DAH) is a patient centered outcome measureable in routinely collected health data. The validity and minimally important difference (MID) in hip fracture have not been evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed construct and predictive validity and estimated a MID for the patient-centred outcome of DAH after hip fracture admission.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study using linked health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. DAH was calculated as the number of days alive within 90 days of admission minus the number of days hospitalised or institutionalised. All hospital admissions (2012-2018) for hip fracture in adults aged >50 years were included. Construct validity analyses used Bayesian quantile regression to estimate the associations of postulated patient, admission and process-related variables with DAH. The predictive validity assessed was the correlation of DAH in 90 days with the value from 91 to 365 days; and the association and discrimination of DAH in 90 days predicting subsequent mortality. MID was estimated by averaging distribution-based and clinical anchor-based estimates.
RESULTS: We identified 63 778 patients with hip fracture. The median number of DAH was 43 (range 0-87). In the 90 days after admission, 8050 (12.6%) people died; a further 6366 (10.0%) died from days 91 to 365. Associations between patient-level and admission-level factors with the median DAH (lower with greater age, frailty and comorbidity, lower if admitted to intensive care or having had a complication) supported construct validity. DAH in 90 days after admission was strongly correlated with DAH in 365 days after admission (r=0.922). An 11-day MID was estimated.
CONCLUSION: DAH has face, construct and predictive validity as a patient-centred outcome in patients with hip fracture, with an estimated MID of 11 days. Future research is required to include direct patient perspectives in confirming MID. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative effectiveness research; evaluation methodology; health services research; patient-centred care; surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330880     DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-013150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  1 in total

1.  Feasibility of Extracting Meaningful Patient Centered Outcomes From the Electronic Health Record Following Critical Illness in the Elderly.

Authors:  Sumera R Ahmad; Alex D Tarabochia; Luann Budahn; Allison M Lemahieu; Brenda Anderson; Kirtivardhan Vashistha; Lioudmila Karnatovskaia; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-06
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.