Literature DB >> 34330753

Epigenetic Analysis of the Chromatin Landscape Identifies a Repertoire of Murine Eosinophil-Specific PU.1-Bound Enhancers.

Jennifer M Felton1, Sushmitha Vallabh1, Sreeja Parameswaran2, Lee E Edsall2, Kevin Ernst2, Benjamin Wronowski1, Astha Malik1, Michael Kotliar1, Matthew T Weirauch2,3,4,5, Artem Barski1,3,6, Patricia C Fulkerson1,3, Marc E Rothenberg7,3.   

Abstract

Eosinophils develop in the bone marrow from hematopoietic progenitors into mature cells capable of a plethora of immunomodulatory roles via the choreographed process of eosinophilopoiesis. However, the gene regulatory elements and transcription factors (TFs) orchestrating this process remain largely unknown. The potency and resulting diversity fundamental to an eosinophil's complex immunomodulatory functions and tissue specialization likely result from dynamic epigenetic regulation of the eosinophil genome, a dynamic eosinophil regulome. In this study, we applied a global approach using broad-range, next-generation sequencing to identify a repertoire of eosinophil-specific enhancers. We identified over 8200 active enhancers located within 1-20 kB of expressed eosinophil genes. TF binding motif analysis revealed PU.1 (Spi1) motif enrichment in eosinophil enhancers, and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with massively parallel sequencing confirmed PU.1 binding in likely enhancers of genes highly expressed in eosinophils. A substantial proportion (>25%) of these PU.1-bound enhancers were unique to murine, culture-derived eosinophils when compared among enhancers of highly expressed genes of three closely related myeloid cell subsets (macrophages, neutrophils, and immature granulocytes). Gene ontology analysis of eosinophil-specific, PU.1-bound enhancers revealed enrichment for genes involved in migration, proliferation, degranulation, and survival. Furthermore, eosinophil-specific superenhancers were enriched in genes whose homologs are associated with risk loci for eosinophilia and allergic diseases. Our collective data identify eosinophil-specific enhancers regulating key eosinophil genes through epigenetic mechanisms (H3K27 acetylation) and TF binding (PU.1).
Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330753      PMCID: PMC8355082          DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.426


  63 in total

Review 1.  The eosinophil.

Authors:  Marc E Rothenberg; Simon P Hogan
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 28.527

2.  An improved ATAC-seq protocol reduces background and enables interrogation of frozen tissues.

Authors:  M Ryan Corces; Alexandro E Trevino; Emily G Hamilton; Peyton G Greenside; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Sam Vesuna; Ansuman T Satpathy; Adam J Rubin; Kathleen S Montine; Beijing Wu; Arwa Kathiria; Seung Woo Cho; Maxwell R Mumbach; Ava C Carter; Maya Kasowski; Lisa A Orloff; Viviana I Risca; Anshul Kundaje; Paul A Khavari; Thomas J Montine; William J Greenleaf; Howard Y Chang
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Human eosinophils have an intact Smad signaling pathway leading to a major transforming growth factor-beta target gene expression.

Authors:  Mirei Kanzaki; Naotaka Shibagaki; Kyosuke Hatsushika; Hiroshi Mitsui; Takashi Inozume; Atsushi Okamoto; Yoh Dobashi; Hideoki Ogawa; Shinji Shimada; Atsuhito Nakao
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2006-11-27       Impact factor: 2.749

Review 4.  The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers.

Authors:  Sven Heinz; Casey E Romanoski; Christopher Benner; Christopher K Glass
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 94.444

5.  The Kruppel-like factor KLF4 is a critical regulator of monocyte differentiation.

Authors:  Mark W Feinberg; Akm Khyrul Wara; Zhuoxiao Cao; Maria A Lebedeva; Frank Rosenbauer; Hiromi Iwasaki; Hideyo Hirai; Jonathan P Katz; Richard L Haspel; Susan Gray; Koichi Akashi; Julie Segre; Klaus H Kaestner; Daniel G Tenen; Mukesh K Jain
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features.

Authors:  Aaron R Quinlan; Ira M Hall
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Functionally competent eosinophils differentiated ex vivo in high purity from normal mouse bone marrow.

Authors:  Kimberly D Dyer; Jennifer M Moser; Meggan Czapiga; Steven J Siegel; Caroline M Percopo; Helene F Rosenberg
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2008-09-15       Impact factor: 5.422

8.  Integrative genomics viewer.

Authors:  James T Robinson; Helga Thorvaldsdóttir; Wendy Winckler; Mitchell Guttman; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Jill P Mesirov
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types.

Authors:  Jason Ernst; Pouya Kheradpour; Tarjei S Mikkelsen; Noam Shoresh; Lucas D Ward; Charles B Epstein; Xiaolan Zhang; Li Wang; Robbyn Issner; Michael Coyne; Manching Ku; Timothy Durham; Manolis Kellis; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Differential oestrogen receptor binding is associated with clinical outcome in breast cancer.

Authors:  Caryn S Ross-Innes; Rory Stark; Andrew E Teschendorff; Kelly A Holmes; H Raza Ali; Mark J Dunning; Gordon D Brown; Ondrej Gojis; Ian O Ellis; Andrew R Green; Simak Ali; Suet-Feung Chin; Carlo Palmieri; Carlos Caldas; Jason S Carroll
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  1 in total

1.  Deciphering Key Foreign Body Reaction-Related Transcription Factors and Genes Through Transcriptome Analysis.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Shaoheng Xiong; Jing Du; Yajuan Song; Tong Wang; Yu Zhang; Chen Dong; ZhaoSong Huang; Qiang He; Zhou Yu; Xianjie Ma
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.