Gustavo D Pimentel1, Maria C M Dela Vega2, Claude Pichard3. 1. Laboratory of Research in Clinical Nutrition and Sports (Labince), Faculty of Nutrition, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. Electronic address: gupimentel@yahoo.com.br. 2. Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil. 3. Clinical Nutrition, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Systemic inflammation has been reported as a new predictor for COVID-19 outcomes. Thus, we hypothesized that ICU patients infected by COVID-19 had lower blood vitamin D levels and increased systemic inflammation. Therefore, this is the first Brazilian study to evaluate the vitamin D concentrations and NLR as a systemic inflammation in patients infected by COVID-19 admitted in ICU. METHODS: This cross-sectional study selected twenty-six patients from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP, Brazil. Twenty-five patients were enrolled from a single hospital and those with blood vitamin D and neutrophil and lymphocyte data were included and had all available data analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: low vitamin D concentration when ≤20 ng/mL (low Vit D group, n = 8, 5M/3F, 62.7 ± 8.4 years old), and normal vitamin D when > 20 ng/mL (normal Vit D group, n = 17, 9M/8F, 74 ± 8.2 years old). Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, C reactive protein (CRP), and count of neutrophils and lymphocytes concentrations were collected from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP. Statistical analyses were performed using the Prism version 5.0 and Student T test was applied to verify any difference between the groups. RESULTS: Low vitamin D group had 15.5 ± 3.3 ng/mL of 25OH Vit D concentrations and normal vitamin D group had 35.9 ± 8.8 ng/mL. Although no difference between groups for CRP concentrations (low Vit D: 4.5 ± 3.3 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 mg/dL, p = 0.45), we found higher neutrophil count and NLR values in the low Vit D group when compared to normal Vit D group (low Vit D: 6049.8 ± 3719.7 vs. normal Vit D: 3741.8 ± 1704.1 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and (low Vit D: 9.0 ± 8.6 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 ng/mL, p = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: This data sharing-derived cases of COVID-19 in patients admitted at ICU showed that patients infected by COVID-19 had lower serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and enhanced systemic inflammation when assessed by NLR values.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Systemic inflammation has been reported as a new predictor for COVID-19 outcomes. Thus, we hypothesized that ICU patientsinfected by COVID-19 had lower blood vitamin D levels and increased systemic inflammation. Therefore, this is the first Brazilian study to evaluate the vitamin D concentrations and NLR as a systemic inflammation in patientsinfected by COVID-19 admitted in ICU. METHODS: This cross-sectional study selected twenty-six patients from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP, Brazil. Twenty-five patients were enrolled from a single hospital and those with blood vitamin D and neutrophil and lymphocyte data were included and had all available data analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: low vitamin D concentration when ≤20 ng/mL (low Vit D group, n = 8, 5M/3F, 62.7 ± 8.4 years old), and normal vitamin D when > 20 ng/mL (normal Vit D group, n = 17, 9M/8F, 74 ± 8.2 years old). Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, C reactive protein (CRP), and count of neutrophils and lymphocytes concentrations were collected from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP. Statistical analyses were performed using the Prism version 5.0 and Student T test was applied to verify any difference between the groups. RESULTS: Low vitamin D group had 15.5 ± 3.3 ng/mL of 25OH Vit D concentrations and normal vitamin D group had 35.9 ± 8.8 ng/mL. Although no difference between groups for CRP concentrations (low Vit D: 4.5 ± 3.3 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 mg/dL, p = 0.45), we found higher neutrophil count and NLR values in the low Vit D group when compared to normal Vit D group (low Vit D: 6049.8 ± 3719.7 vs. normal Vit D: 3741.8 ± 1704.1 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and (low Vit D: 9.0 ± 8.6 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 ng/mL, p = 0.03), respectively. CONCLUSION: This data sharing-derived cases of COVID-19 in patients admitted at ICU showed that patientsinfected by COVID-19 had lower serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and enhanced systemic inflammation when assessed by NLR values.
The coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic has significantly increased the number of hospitalizations [1]. During the hospitalization, many patients suffered of an aggravation of their symptoms related to COVID-19 infection (i.e. cough, fever, acute respiratory failure, fatigue, and inflammation) associated with 15–20% of hospital mortality and about 40% of infectedpatients requiring ICU admission [2]. A meta-analysis showed that patients with serum vitamin D concentrations <20 ng/mL had an increased risk of pneumonia [3]. Although, no negative correlation between blood vitamin D concentration and deaths (r = −0.35, p = 0.12) was found, there is a negative correlation between the vitamin D concentration and the number of case of COVID-19infectedpatients in the general population [4]. In previous study, we found that low blood vitamin D (<17.7 ng/mL) concentrations are associated with the ICU clinical outcomes, such as acute respiratory failure, infections and acute liver failure [5].Many studies reported some effects immunomodulatory of vitamin D, no randomized controlled trial was performed to test whether or not vitamin D supplementation is able to reduce the rate of ICU admission of COVID-19infectedpatients, and to blunt the viral infection and the level of proinflammatory cytokines [6]. Systemic inflammation markers, such as increased neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) are used as a prognostic marker for severity and mortality in COVID-19patients [7]. However, the relationship between vitamin D and systemic inflammation observed in Brazilian patients remains to be elucidated.Thus, we hypothesized that ICU patientsinfected by COVID-19 had lower blood vitamin D levels and increased systemic inflammation. Therefore, this is the first study to evaluate the vitamin D concentrations and NLR as a systemic inflammation in Brazilian patientsinfected by COVID-19 admitted in ICU.
Methods
This cross-sectional study selected twenty-six patients from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP, Brazil, that included data from Hospital Sírio Libanês, Brazil (i.e. 20 patients came from Sao Paulo State, 5 from Pará State and 1 from Maranhão State, but one patient was excluded because of outlier values of biochemical parameters). Thus, twenty-five patients were enrolled from a single hospital and those with blood vitamin D and neutrophil and lymphocyte data were included and had all available data analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: low vitamin D concentration when ≤20 ng/mL (low Vit D group, n = 8, 5M/3F, 62.7 ± 8.4 years old), and normal vitamin D when > 20 ng/mL (normal Vit D group, n = 17, 9M/8F, 74 ± 8.2 years old). Serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, C reactive protein (CRP), and count of neutrophils and lymphocytes concentrations were collected from COVID-19 Data Sharing/FAPESP, Hospital Sírio Libanês, Brazil. Statistical analyses were performed using the Prism version 5.0 and Student T and Pearson's correlation tests were applied to verify any difference between the groups.
Results and discussion
As result, we found that the low vitamin D group had 15.5 ± 3.3 ng/mL of 25OH Vit D concentrations and normal vitamin D when >20 ng/mL had 35.9 ± 8.8 ng/mL (Fig. 1
A). Although there is no difference between groups for blood CRP concentrations (low Vit D: 4.5 ± 3.3 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 mg/dL, p = 0.45) (Fig. 1B), we found higher neutrophil count and NLR values in the low Vit D group when compared with the normal Vit D group (low Vit D: 6049.8 ± 3719.7 vs. normal Vit D: 3741.8 ± 1704.1 ng/mL, p = 0.02) and (low Vit D: 9.0 ± 8.6 vs. normal Vit D: 4.2 ± 4.0 ng/mL, p = 0.03), respectively (Fig. 1C and E). However, there is no difference among the groups for blood lymphocytes count (Fig. 1D). Additionally, no correlation was found between the 25OH Vit D concentrations and neutrophil values (r = −0.31, p = 0.11).
Fig. 1
The 25-OH vitamin D3 and systemic inflammation markers in COVID-19 patients admitted at ICU single hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. NLR: neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio, CRP: C reactive protein. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p < 0.05 was considered as significant statistically.
The 25-OH vitamin D3 and systemic inflammation markers in COVID-19patients admitted at ICU single hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. NLR: neutrophil-lymphocytes ratio, CRP: C reactive protein. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. p < 0.05 was considered as significant statistically.Additionally, the mortality rate was higher in the low Vit D group (20%) when compared to normal Vit D group (17.6%). COVID-19patients had increased NLR which is accompanied with poorer prognosis and increased mortality [8]. In addition, a large retrospective and observational identified that SARS-CoV-2 infection positivity rate was higher in patients with <20 ng/mL 25(OH)D concentrations than in patients with 25(OH)D higher or equal to 30 ng/mL [9]. Although, the paricalcitol infusion therapy, a vitamin D analog has been recently FDA-approved to detain the COVID19-induced cytokines [10], also is suggested supplementation with vitamin D based on deficiency or insufficiency of this vitamin [11]. In addition, an adequate diet in vegetables and fruits ensure a ingestion of vitamin A, B, C and D and minerals which is imperative to boost to immune system [12].Vitamin D is linked to immune system regulation, gut microbiota and epithelial tight junctions' regulation. Moreover, hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV2 present gastrointestinal problems which may be prevented by several nutritional strategies, including the vitamin D [13].The present study had some limitations. First, no data are available in the Data Sharing/FAPESP, Brazil about respiratory indicator and nutrition status, for e.g. body mass index, which would be useful to provide the correlation between vitamin D and body mass index, since vitamin D is stored in adipose tissue. Second, we did not find the correlation among the 25OH Vit D concentrations and neutrophil values, which did not allow to establish the relationship of causality, however, lack of correlation may be due to low sample size, and Third, the lack of data on sunlight exposure did not allow generalize these data for other countries and therefore, further studies are warranted. Some strength is highlighted, such as it is the first Brazilian study on vitamin D in COVID19 patients which allow to create a strategy to use the vitamin D supplementation in these patients.In conclusion, this data sharing-derived cases of COVID-19 in patients admitted at ICU showed that patientsinfected by COVID-19 had lower serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D and enhanced systemic inflammation when assessed by NLR values. Therefore, our data further strengthen the positive role of the vitamin D on immunity and suggests that 1000–2000 IU of vitamin D3 per day may be beneficial [6]. Additionally, a large scale randomized and well-controlled trial is required to confirm that vitamin D3 is able to blunt the viral infection and boost the immune system in COVID-19 pandemic.
Authorship
GDP, MCMDV, and CP wrote the article and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Authors: Safiya Richardson; Jamie S Hirsch; Mangala Narasimhan; James M Crawford; Thomas McGinn; Karina W Davidson; Douglas P Barnaby; Lance B Becker; John D Chelico; Stuart L Cohen; Jennifer Cookingham; Kevin Coppa; Michael A Diefenbach; Andrew J Dominello; Joan Duer-Hefele; Louise Falzon; Jordan Gitlin; Negin Hajizadeh; Tiffany G Harvin; David A Hirschwerk; Eun Ji Kim; Zachary M Kozel; Lyndonna M Marrast; Jazmin N Mogavero; Gabrielle A Osorio; Michael Qiu; Theodoros P Zanos Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Tatyanne Ln Gomes; Renata C Fernandes; Liana L Vieira; Raquel M Schincaglia; João F Mota; Marciano S Nóbrega; Claude Pichard; Gustavo D Pimentel Journal: Nutrition Date: 2018-10-24 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Yuwei Liu; Xuebei Du; Jing Chen; Yalei Jin; Li Peng; Harry H X Wang; Mingqi Luo; Ling Chen; Yan Zhao Journal: J Infect Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 6.072