Literature DB >> 34330262

The trend of direct medical costs and associated factors in patients with chronic hepatitis B in Guangzhou, China: an eight-year retrospective cohort study.

Shuo Yang1, Ge Chen1, Yueping Li2, Guanhai Li1, Yingfang Liang2, Feng Zhou1, Shudong Zhou1, Yi Yang1, Weidong Jia3, Yanhui Gao4,5, Yue Chen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the expenses of liver cirrhosis are covered by a critical illness fund under the current health insurance program in China, the medical costs associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related diseases is not well addressed. In order to provide evidence to address the problem, we investigated the trend of direct medical costs and associated factors in patients with chronic HBV infection.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 65,175 outpatients and 12,649 inpatients was conducted using a hospital information system database for the period from 2008 to 2015. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were applied to explore associations between annual direct medical costs and corresponding factors, meanwhile quantile regression models were used to evaluate the effect of treatment modes on different quantiles of annual direct medical costs stratified by medical insurances.
RESULTS: The direct medical costs increased with time, but the proportion of antiviral costs decreased with CHB progression. Antiviral costs accounted 54.61% of total direct medical costs for outpatients, but only 6.17% for inpatients. Non-antiviral medicine costs (46.06%) and lab tests costs (23.63%) accounted for the majority of the cost for inpatients. The direct medical costs were positively associated with CHB progression and hospitalization days in inpatients. The direct medical costs were the highest in outpatients with medical insurance and in inpatients with free medical service, and treatment modes had different effects on the direct medical costs in patients with and without medical insurance.
CONCLUSIONS: CHB patients had a heavy economic burden in Guangzhou, China, which increased over time, which were influenced by payment mode and treatment mode.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic hepatitis B; Direct medical costs; Generalized estimating equations; Quantile regression

Year:  2021        PMID: 34330262      PMCID: PMC8323196          DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01429-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health concern [1]. In China, the overall annual incidence of hepatitis B was 80.63 per 10 million during the period from 2004 to 2013 [2], and a recent systematic review of global HBV infection indicated that China was an intermediate endemic area for the infection, with a combined prevalence of HBV infection of 5.7% [3]. China has the largest number of HBV infected people in the world, and there are approximately 76 million HBV carriers among the populations under the age of 60 years [4]. Patients infected with HBV are at significant risk for developing chronic hepatitis B (CHB), compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, and primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [5]. CHB and its related diseases pose a substantial economic burden on patients and their families [6, 7], and medical costs comprise the majority portion of the total expenditures and increase with disease progression [6, 8–13]. However, there was high heterogeneity for the estimates of medical costs due to HBV infection from previous studies [8-16] and cross-sectional or short term data did not provide a trajectory of the costs over time. This study aimed to estimate the direct medical costs due to HBV infection and its complications, costs components and associated factors based on data from a real-world retrospective cohort of CHB patients for the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2015 in Guangzhou, China. The results can be utilized in cost-effectiveness evaluation of treatment and help healthcare providers and policy makers for their efforts in improving patients' health conditions and reducing medical costs.

Methods

Study design and study population

Two retrospective cohorts of outpatients and inpatients were created using the electronic medical records from the hospital information system (HIS) of the Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital, the largest specialized infectious disease hospital in Guangdong Province, China. This cohort included inpatients and outpatients with HBV related conditions including CHB, cirrhosis (including compensated and decompensated cirrhosis) and HCC during the period from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2015, who were identified according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes (CHB: B18.0 and B18.1, cirrhosis: K74.601 and K74.602, HCC: K76.814). Patients co-infected with hepatitis A, hepatitis C, hepatitis D, hepatitis E, HIV or cytomegalovirus (CMV)were excluded from this study. Patients admitted to the hospital due to pregnancy or other diseases including glomerulonephritis, uremia, metabolic syndrome, tumor, sever cardiovascular diseases were also excluded.

Study variables

Information on demographics, health insurance status, clinical diagnosis, and medications prescribed and their costs were extracted from patients’ medical records. Direct medical costs in this study were classified into the following categories: (1) laboratory tests and imaging examinations, (2) antiviral therapy, (3) other treatment of HBV infection such as hepatoprotective drugs, traditional Chinese medication, (4) bed and nursing costs (for inpatients only) and (5) other costs including registration and consultation costs (for outpatients only), radiation therapy, anesthesia, surgery and blood transfusion (for inpatients only). The total annual direct medical costs for each patient were the sum of all these costs every year. Types of treatment were anti-viral drug (yes/no), hepatoprotective drug (yes/no), traditional Chinese medication (yes/no) and anti-fibrotic medication (yes/no). “Yes” means that a patient received a prescription of specific drugs in the year of visit/admission. Anti-viral drugs included Interferon (IFN), lamivudine (LAM), adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), entecavir (ETV), telbivudine (LdT) and tenofovir (TDF). Patients were grouped into the following categories according to health insurance status: free medical service, medical insurance, self-payment and others.

Statistical analysis

The direct medical costs per person per year were taken as the analysis unit. Mean, median and upper and lower quartiles of annual direct medical costs were calculated, and the costs were expressed in RMB in the year of 2015 and were adjusted by a discount rate of 5% per year. Average annual direct medical costs, costs components and corresponding proportions of costs components in total direct medical costs were also calculated for inpatients and outpatients by different disease stages. Because of extremely positive partial peak distribution and individual correlation of medical costs between multiple visits/admissions for individual patients, generalized estimating equations (GEE) [17] with log link function and gamma error distribution were applied to explore the associations between determinants and direct medical costs. Quantile regression models [18] were used to assess the effect of treatment modalities on direct medical costs for patients according to medical insurance status. Quantile regression makes no requirement for the distribution of random errors, and is particularly effective when the distribution is asymmetric, thick-tailed, or deleted. The statistical analyses were conducted separately for outpatients and inpatients by using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cray, NC).

Results

General characteristics of the study population

A total of 65,175 outpatients and 12,649 inpatients were retrieved from the Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital database for the study period between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015 (Fig. 1). General characteristics of the outpatients and the inpatients by disease stages were detailed in Table 1. Approximate 90% outpatient visits and 57% inpatients admissions were due to CHB, 9% and 27% were due to cirrhosis, and 1% and 16% were due to HCC. About 75% of these patients were male and the proportion of patients aged 40 to 60 accounted for approximately 50%. Self-payment and medical insurance were the main payment modes. Table 1 also shows the proportions of patients received prescriptions for antiviral drugs, hepatoprotective drugs, traditional Chinese medicine and anti-fibrotic medicine for outpatients and inpatients.
Fig. 1

Flow chart of records selection

Table 1

Characteristics and medication use of outpatients and inpatients [N (%)]

CharacteristicsOutpatientsInpatients
CHBCirrhosisHCCTotalCHBCirrhosisHCCTotal
N58,857 (90.31)5610 (8.61)708 (1.09)65,175 (100.00)7224 (57.11)3449 (27.27)1976 (15.62)12,649 (100.00)
Age (years)a35.07 ± 12.2448.90 ± 12.9552.62 ± 13.0836.45 ± 13.0234.11 ± 11.5449.72 ± 12.6652.02 ± 12.5341.17 ± 14.53
Genderb
 Male41,816 (71.08)4241 (75.61)603 (85.17)46,660 (71.62)5287 (73.19)2651 (76.86)1719 (86.99)9657 (76.35)
 Female17,015 (28.92)1368 (24.39)105 (14.83)18,488 (28.38)1937 (26.81)798 (23.14)257 (13.01)2992 (23.65)
Payment mode
 Self-payment39,481 (67.08)3958 (70.55)607 (85.73)44,046 (67.58)4756 (65.84)2379 (68.98)1393 (70.50)8528 (67.42)
 Medical insurance15,419 (26.20)1314 (23.42)75 (10.59)16,808 (25.79)2128 (29.46)910 (26.38)493 (24.95)3531 (27.92)
 Free medical service3951 (6.71)338 (6.02)26 (3.67)4315 (6.62)301 (4.17)130 (3.77)74 (3.74)505 (3.99)
 Othersc6 (0.01)0 (0.00)0 (0.00)6 (0.01)39 (0.54)30 (0.87)16 (0.81)85 (0.67)
Antiviral medicine
 Yesd25,525 (43.37)2803 (49.96)172 (24.29)28,500 (43.73)4036 (55.87)2221 (64.40)1031 (52.18)7288 (57.62)
 No33,332 (56.63)2807 (50.04)536 (75.71)36,675 (56.27)3188 (44.13)1228 (35.60)945 (47.82)5361 (42.38)
IFN
 Yesd4092 (6.95)44 (0.78)0 (0.00)4136 (6.35)1768 (24.47)79 (2.29)1 (0.05)1848 (14.61)
 No54,765 (93.05)5566 (99.22)708 (100.00)61,039 (93.65)5456 (75.53)3370 (97.71)1975 (99.95)10,801 (85.39)
NAs
 Yesd22,811 (38.76)2778 (49.52)172 (24.29)25,761 (39.53)2402 (33.25)2148 (62.28)1030 (52.13)5580 (44.11)
 No36,046 (61.24)2832 (50.48)536 (75.71)39,414 (60.47)4822 (66.75)1301 (37.72)946 (47.87)7069 (55.89)
Hepatoprotective drugs
 Yesd32,247 (54.79)2447 (43.62)207 (29.24)34,901 (53.55)6686 (92.55)3338 (96.78)1917 (97.01)11,941 (94.40)
 No26,610 (45.21)3163 (56.38)501 (70.76)30,274 (46.45)538 (7.45)111 (3.22)59 (2.99)708 (5.60)
Chinese medicine
 Yesd26,172 (44.47)3068 (54.69)255 (36.02)29,495 (45.26)3741 (51.79)2302 (66.74)1264 (63.97)7307 (57.77)
 No32,685 (55.53)2542 (45.31)453 (63.98)35,680 (54.74)3483 (48.21)1147 (33.26)712 (36.03)5342 (42.23)
Anti-fibrotic medicine
 Yesd9142 (15.53)3298 (58.79)214 (30.23)12,654 (19.42)936 (12.96)1895 (54.94)858 (43.42)3689 (29.16)
 No49,715 (84.47)2312 (41.21)494 (69.77)52,521 (80.58)6288 (87.04)1554 (45.06)1118 (56.58)8960 (70.84)
Visiting timesa4 (2–14)4 (2–15)1 (1–3)4 (2–14)1 (1–1)1 (1–2)1 (1–1)1 (1–1)

aMean ± STD

bGender: outpatients have 27 gender missing values

cOthers: commercial insurance and cooperative medical service, etc.

dYes: patients received prescription for corresponding drugs in this year

Flow chart of records selection Characteristics and medication use of outpatients and inpatients [N (%)] aMean ± STD bGender: outpatients have 27 gender missing values cOthers: commercial insurance and cooperative medical service, etc. dYes: patients received prescription for corresponding drugs in this year

Average annual direct medical costs and costs components from 2008 to 2015

The average annual direct medical costs for outpatients and inpatients were 3731.05 and 12,967.77 RMB for CHB; 5871.55 and 23,869.57 RMB for cirrhosis; and 3734.82 and 27,996.54 RMB for HCC, respectively. Table 2 showed the components of average annual direct medical costs for patients with different disease stages. For outpatients, use of antiviral drugs (54.61%) was the costliest component, followed by non-antiviral medications (28.76%, including 9.80% of hepatoprotective drugs, 11.00% of traditional Chinese medicine and 8.71% anti-fibrotic drugs). For inpatients, use of non-antiviral medications contributed 46.06% (including 15.68% of hepatoprotective drugs, 2.92% of traditional Chinese medications and 1.49% anti-fibrotic drugs) and lab tests and imaging examinations contributed 23.63% of the total costs. Antiviral medication costs accounted for only 6.17% of the total costs for inpatients.
Table 2

Average annual direct medical costs and cost components by disease states (RMB)

Disease stagesTotal costsLab tests and imaging examinations costs (%)Antiviral therapy costs (%)Other medicine costs (%)Bed and nursing costs (%)Other costs (%)Hepatoprotective drugs costs (%)Chinese medicine costs (%)Anti-fibrotic medicine costs (%)
Outpatients
 CHB3731.05612.59 (16.42)2115.80 (56.71)973.74 (26.10)26.77 (0.72)402.26 (10.78)321.68 (8.62)192.66 (5.16)
 Cirrhosis5871.55791.89 (13.49)2762.03 (47.04)2280.05 (38.83)35.57 (0.61)352.18 (6.00)1171.40 (19.95)1317.66 (22.44)
 HCC3734.82736.14 (19.71)1347.16 (36.07)1597.73 (42.78)51.37 (1.38)230.27 (6.17)897.42 (24.03)782.29 (20.95)
 All4019.52638.01 (15.87)2195.07 (54.61)1156.11 (28.76)28.20 (0.70)393.77 (9.80)442.03 (11.00)350.25 (8.71)
Inpatients
 CHB12,967.773582.27 (27.62)1248.97 (9.63)5549.54 (42.79)1185.32 (9.14)1401.66 (10.81)2827.57 (21.80)274.13 (2.11)80.71 (0.62)
 Cirrhosis23,869.575352.03 (22.42)1223.75 (5.13)11,798.04 (49.43)1479.03 (6.20)4016.72 (16.83)3352.95 (14.05)781.21 (3.27)534.99 (2.24)
 HCC27,996.545513.45 (19.69)765.67 (2.73)12,775.57 (45.63)1294.78 (4.62)7647.07 (27.31)2594.88 (9.27)993.19 (3.55)441.90 (1.58)
 All18,801.964443.79 (23.63)1159.99 (6.17)8659.90 (46.06)1292.78 (6.87)3245.50 (17.26)2947.68 (15.68)548.87 (2.92)279.21 (1.49)
Average annual direct medical costs and cost components by disease states (RMB) The direct medical costs were mostly increasing from the year of 2008 to 2015 for all the patients (Fig. 2). The proportion of antiviral drug use was decreasing with the disease stage (Fig. 3). The costliest component was antiviral drug use for outpatients and use of non-antiviral drugs for inpatients. Among outpatients, the proportion of antiviral drug use increased, whereas the proportion of non-antiviral drug use and lab test decreased over time.
Fig. 2

Annual direct medical costs by disease stage in outpatients and inpatients in 2008–2015

Fig. 3

Components of medical costs by disease stage in outpatients and inpatients in 2008–2015

Annual direct medical costs by disease stage in outpatients and inpatients in 2008–2015 Components of medical costs by disease stage in outpatients and inpatients in 2008–2015

Associated factors for annual direct medical costs

Table 3 showed the factors associated with annual direct medical costs in outpatients and inpatients. Male and older patients had significantly higher costs as compared with female and younger patients (P < 0.0001). For outpatients, those with medical insurance had the highest costs, followed by those who paid out-of-pocket and those with free medical service. For inpatients, those with free medical service had the highest costs, followed by patients with medical insurance and those who paid out-of-pocket. Antiviral therapy [β(SE) = 1.68(0.01), P < 0.0001], hepatoprotective drugs [β(SE) = 1.68(0.01), P < 0.0001], traditional Chinese medication [β(SE) = 0.22(0.01), P < 0.0001] and anti-fibrotic medication [β(SE) = 0.55(0.01), P < 0.0001] significantly increased the direct medical costs for outpatients. Similarly, antiviral therapy [β(SE) = 0.17(0.01), P < 0.0001], hepatoprotective drugs [β(SE) = 0.25(0.01), P < 0.0001], traditional Chinese medication [β(SE) = 0.17(0.01), P < 0.0001] significantly increased the direct medical costs for inpatients. The direct medical costs were positively associated with the progression of HBV infection and hospitalization days in inpatients (P < 0.0001).
Table 3

Characteristics and factors associated with annual direct medical costs among outpatients and inpatients using GEE with log link and gamma distribution

FactorsOutpatientsInpatients
Cost (mean)Cost (M(Q1–Q3))βSEdPCost (mean)Cost (M(Q1–Q3))βSEdP
Gendera
 Male4198.921909.98 (664.50–5813.24)Ref19,449.2012,004.35 (6765.12–22,922.24)Ref
 Female3530.351463.41 (553.91–4616.10)–0.070.01 < 0.000116,701.8610,604.72 (6300.63–19,184.97)–0.060.01 < 0.0001
Age
 18–293638.451398.60 (541.19–4592.04)Ref12,173.288263.53 (5078.25–13,815.65)Ref
 30–394171.641802.43 (636.68–5708.63)0.030.010.006815,866.6110,525.78 (6150.71–18,696.58)0.110.02 < 0.0001
 40–494336.782210.05 (734.33–6163.25)–0.010.010.898221,198.4613,456.04 (7303.28–25,995.43)0.220.02 < 0.0001
 50–594185.272093.56 (737.78–5985.38)–0.050.010.000823,465.8315,388.61 (8448.31–29,266.38)0.240.02 < 0.0001
  ≥ 603847.181893.67 (667.02–5364.38)–0.100.02 < 0.000126,068.3516,874.79 (9145.88 – 31,415.35)0.280.02 < 0.0001
Payment mode
 Self-payment3712.911559.49 (588.49–4887.64)ref17,784.6611,168.72 (6287.71–21,266.31)Ref
 Medical insurance5066.042862.03 (882.33–7450.20)0.110.01 < 0.000120,808.6612,406.73 (7273.45–23,788.23)–0.040.010.0018
 Free medical service2784.961140.70 (445.45–3205.32)–0.190.02 < 0.000121,428.3314,006.00 (8526.01–25,144.22)–0.140.03 < 0.0001
 Othersb852.51706.95 (403.26–1084.77)–0.140.130.283913,166.878786.42 (5699.22–17,312.19)–0.090.070. 1810
Antiviral medicine
 No1475.46771.42 (402.67–1692.61)ref14,125.198132.11 (4841.38–15,879.36)Ref
 Yesc7020.085357.05 (2301.01–9959.00)1.680.01 < 0.000122,221.8914,401.12 (8643.15–26,762.65)0.170.01 < 0.0001
Hepatoprotective drugs
 No3783.10778.77 (408.76–1706.41)ref6774.954308.40 (3100.17–7352.18)Ref
 Yesc4260.315356.04 (2306.41–9944.59)0.510.01 < 0.000119,695.6712,342.43 (7257.06–23,087.47)0.250.02 < 0.0001
 No3386.251313.54 (517.40–4527.89)Ref13,039.138274.40 (4949.98–15,263.26)ref
 Yesc5239.272859.98 (1098.96–7249.16)0.220.01 < 0.000123,146.2614,760.32 (8639.26–28,007.82)0.170.01 < 0.0001
Anti-fibrotic medicine
 No3489.431422.17 (555.26–4543.92)Ref16,574.2910,036.57 (5880.35–18,612.07)Ref
 Yesc6763.954843.03 (1937.49–9969.05)0.550.01 < 0.000124,049.9516,327.63 (9261.82–29,651.38)–0.020.010.1162
Disease stages
 CHB3731.051570.04 (587.63–4954.84)Ref12,967.779094.66 (5550.94–15,113.85)Ref
 Cirrhosis5871.553823.50 (1285.07–9027.62)0.140.01 < 0.000123,869.5715,703.35 (8847.61–28,033.55)0.400.03 < 0.0001
 HCC3734.821676.06 (610.75–4737.08)0.100.050.044327,996.5420,271.02 (8274.40–36,742.64)0.620.03 < 0.0001
Length of stay (days)
  < 106633.505304.68 (3879.56–7584.06)ref
 10–2013,584.7010,574.83 (7767.96–15,979.52)0.610.01 < 0.0001
  > 2033,436.7023,685.30 (15,248.07–41,328.95)1.470.02 < 0.0001

aGender: 60 were missing for outpatients

bOthers: commercial insurance and cooperative medical service, etc.

cYes: patients received prescription for corresponding drugs

dSE: standard error

Characteristics and factors associated with annual direct medical costs among outpatients and inpatients using GEE with log link and gamma distribution aGender: 60 were missing for outpatients bOthers: commercial insurance and cooperative medical service, etc. cYes: patients received prescription for corresponding drugs dSE: standard error Figures 4 and 5 showed the results from quantile regression models for treatment modes associated with direct medical costs. In outpatients, the utilization of antiviral drugs, hepatoprotective drugs, traditional Chinese medications and anti-fibrosis drugs increased the direct medical costs of patients with or without medical insurance, and it was more so for patients with a high level of medical costs. In inpatients, the utilization of antiviral drugs significantly increased the direct medical costs. The 25%, 50% and 75% of quantile regression coefficients for antiviral treatment associated with the direct medical costs were 1081.45, 1264.65 and 1435.69 for out-of-pocket inpatients, respectively, as compared with 771.33, 920.32 and 809.75 insured inpatients. However, the influences of hepatoprotective drugs, traditional Chinese medication and anti-fibrosis drugs on the direct medical costs were similar for inpatients with and without medical insurance.
Fig. 4

Impact of different treatment modes on direct medical costs in outpatients: quantile regression

Fig. 5

Impact of different treatment modes on direct medical costs in inpatients: quantile regression

Impact of different treatment modes on direct medical costs in outpatients: quantile regression Impact of different treatment modes on direct medical costs in inpatients: quantile regression

Discussion

Our study found that the average annual direct medical costs for patients with HBV related diseases in Guangzhou were substantial and the annual direct medical costs were increasing for both outpatients and inpatients from 2008 to 2015. Guangzhou is the capital city of Guangdong Province, Southeast China, is the forefront of China’s economic and social development. According to the annual report of the bureau of statistics in Guangzhou, the disposable personal income was 46,734.60 RMB in 2015 [19]. As for CHB patients, the direct medical costs of the three disease stages accounted for 7.98–12.56% of individual income annually on average for outpatients and 27.75–59.91% for inpatients in Guangzhou, which is slightly higher than results of 5–40% from a study from Beijing in 2012 [20]. Our results indicated that treatment mode was an important determinant of annual direct medical costs for CHB patients. Antiviral therapy is the most key to favorable prognosis for CHB-related disease patients, especially in the early stages of HBV infection [21]. The annual direct medical costs for patients with antiviral therapy were consistently higher than those without antiviral treatment (fivefold for outpatients vs 1.2-fold for inpatients), and the annual costs of antiviral medications and its percentage of the total medical costs descended with disease progression. The antiviral medications accounted for 65.50% of the medical costs for CHB outpatients but only 45.75% for HCC outpatients. Patients with cirrhosis and HCC utilized more medical resources other than antiviral medications. Compared with outpatients, the proportion of antiviral treatment costs in inpatients were lower and only accounted for a small percentage of the direct medical costs for each disease stages, while other medications and lab tests and imaging examinations made up a major percentage of the costs. CHB patients acquire a higher proportion of antiviral treatment in the early disease stage to prevent the progression of liver diseases. However, this study shows that the antiviral utilization rate was not high, only 43.73% for outpatients and 57.62% for inpatients. A study from five European countries (including Germany, France, Turkey, Poland and Romania) showed that the antiviral utilization rate was 44.75% [22]. Similarly, a study from Beijing reported the antiviral utilization rate was 50.00% for outpatients and 61.80% for inpatients [20]. The reasons for the low antiviral utilization rate should be further studied. To effectively protect the liver of patients is one challenge for the medical and pharmaceutical professions [23, 24]. Available chemical drugs used for the treatment of liver disease could have a variety of adverse effects and damage the liver. Hepatoprotective drugs have the function of protecting liver, reducing transaminase and enhancing immunocompetence, thus it has been recommended as an adjuvant therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B [4, 25]. In our study, 53.55% of outpatients and 94.40% received hepatoprotective drugs treatment, and 19.42% of outpatients and 29.16% received anti-fibrosis drugs. Hepatoprotective drugs of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) [4] is popular in China, especially for CHB patients who fail to recover and seek alternative therapy [8, 26]. Our study showed that 45.26% of outpatients and 57.77% of inpatients received TCM treatment. Health insurance status is an important influencing factor for medical costs [20, 27, 28]. The direct medical costs were the highest for outpatients with medical insurance and for inpatients with free medical service. Quantile regression showed that the effect of treatment mode on medical expenses was different for patients with different medical insurance status, especially for inpatients since free medical service and health insurance policies often provide a higher proportion of reimbursement for inpatients than for outpatients. Patients are motivated to be hospitalized to receive antiviral therapy or to have expensive tests for acquiring more reimbursement. Insurance policies should be modified to avoid the waste of medical resources. In this study, patients with medical insurance and those out-of-pocket were accounted for 67.76% and 26.13% of the total population, respectively. There are still medical insurance policy differences for the different CHB patients now. Since 2008, health insurance policy has experienced a series of changes in Guangzhou. The Outpatient Medical Insurance Fund Policy was implemented in Guangzhou on August 1, 2008, that provided monthly quota payment for patients. Until October 1, 2013, both urban and rural residents were paid with CHB patients 100 RMB per month by this Fund. The payment increased to 400 RMB per month on January 1, 2015. Our previous studies have shown that those policy changes could promote the utilization of antiviral drugs in patients with CHB [29]. In the long run, the insurance system should be improved to narrow the gap between different medical insurance policy, and it is important to gradually enlarge the outpatient coverage and improve utilization of antiviral drugs. Meanwhile, HBV diagnosis, prevention and treatment behavior should be regulated and strengthened to reduce the economic burden of CHB patients, safeguarding their health interests. This was a retrospective cohort study based on medical records of CHB patients from one hospital and has some limitations. First, patients might visited other hospitals or pharmacies and the medical costs might be underestimated. Second, it is difficult to distinguish treatment-naive patients with treatment-experienced patients, and therefore, switch or add-on treatments were not considered. Third, the retrospective study design could result in incomplete information. Fourth, our data only came from one hospital. However, Guangzhou Eighth People’s Hospital is the earliest and the only specialized liver disease hospital in Guangdong, and 8-year retrospective cohort of CHB showed stable and adequate cases in this hospital. Except hepatitis B-related HCC patients, it is to a certain extent representative for patients with CHB and cirrhosis. Other potential confounding factors such as education, income and severity of the disease were not taken into account in this study.

Conclusion

CHB patients had a heavy economic burden that continued to be intensified. Annual direct medical costs for CHB patients increased significantly as the disease stage progressed although the proportion of the antiviral medication costs decreased. Antiviral therapy costed the most for CHB outpatients but for inpatients, non-antiviral medications and lab tests and imaging examinations were main components of the direct medical costs. Treatment patterns and medical insurance policies were main influencing factors of the annual direct medical costs. Early antiviral treatment could reduce the economic burden of CHB patients, and rational drug utilization and expanding medical insurance coverage might reduce the direct medical costs for CHB patients.
  24 in total

1.  The cost of managing chronic hepatitis B infection: a global perspective.

Authors:  Kris V Kowdley
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.062

2.  [Analysis on morbidity and mortality of viral hepatitis in China, 2004-2013].

Authors:  Minna Zhang; Yue Yuan; Panyong Mao; Yingjie Zhuang
Journal:  Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2015-02

3.  Antiviral drug utilization and annual expenditures for patients with chronic HBV infection in Guangzhou, China, in 2008-2015.

Authors:  Feng Zhou; Weidong Jia; Shuo Yang; Ge Chen; Guanhai Li; Yueping Li; Yingfang Liang; Yi Yang; Yanhui Gao; Yue Chen
Journal:  Antivir Ther       Date:  2019

4.  Predicting cirrhosis risk based on the level of circulating hepatitis B viral load.

Authors:  Uchenna H Iloeje; Hwai-I Yang; Jun Su; Chin-Lan Jen; San-Lin You; Chien-Jen Chen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  The global burden of liver disease: the major impact of China.

Authors:  Fu-Sheng Wang; Jian-Gao Fan; Zheng Zhang; Bin Gao; Hong-Yang Wang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 6.  Estimations of worldwide prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systematic review of data published between 1965 and 2013.

Authors:  Aparna Schweitzer; Johannes Horn; Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Gérard Krause; Jördis J Ott
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B: opportunities and challenges in Asia.

Authors:  Yun-Fan Liaw
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 25.083

8.  Impact of a new reimbursement program on hepatitis B antiviral medication cost and utilization in Beijing, China.

Authors:  Qian Qiu; Yan Li; Xiao-wan Duan; Li-kun Yang; Yu Chen; Hui Li; Li Wang; Zhong-ping Duan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Disease Burden from Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Guangdong Province, China.

Authors:  Jianpeng Xiao; Hualiang Lin; Tao Liu; Weilin Zeng; Xing Li; Xiaoping Shao; Qiu Tan; Yanjun Xu; Xiaojun Xu; Huizhen Zheng; Wenjun Ma
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Direct economic burden of hepatitis B virus related diseases: evidence from Shandong, China.

Authors:  Jingjing Lu; Aiqiang Xu; Jian Wang; Li Zhang; Lizhi Song; Renpeng Li; Shunxiang Zhang; Guihua Zhuang; Mingshan Lu
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.