Christopher C Butler1, Ly-Mee Yu2, Jienchi Dorward3, Oghenekome Gbinigie2, Gail Hayward2, Benjamin R Saville4, Oliver Van Hecke2, Nicholas Berry5, Michelle A Detry5, Christina Saunders5, Mark Fitzgerald5, Victoria Harris2, Ratko Djukanovic6, Stephan Gadola7, John Kirkpatrick8, Simon de Lusignan2, Emma Ogburn2, Philip H Evans9, Nicholas P B Thomas10, Mahendra G Patel11, F D Richard Hobbs2. 1. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: christopher.butler@phc.ox.ac.uk. 2. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. 4. Berry Consultants, Austin, TX, USA; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. 5. Berry Consultants, Austin, TX, USA. 6. Clinical and Experimental Science, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 7. Rheumatology and Pain Medicine, Bethesda Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. 8. Independent Researcher, Glatton, UK. 9. College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK; NIHR Clinical Research Network, NIHR, London, UK. 10. NIHR Clinical Research Network, NIHR, London, UK; Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK. 11. Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Doxycycline is often used for treating COVID-19 respiratory symptoms in the community despite an absence of evidence from clinical trials to support its use. We aimed to assess the efficacy of doxycycline to treat suspected COVID-19 in the community among people at high risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: We did a national, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised trial of interventions against COVID-19 in older people (PRINCIPLE) across primary care centres in the UK. We included people aged 65 years or older, or 50 years or older with comorbidities (weakened immune system, heart disease, hypertension, asthma or lung disease, diabetes, mild hepatic impairment, stroke or neurological problem, and self-reported obesity or body-mass index of 35 kg/m2 or greater), who had been unwell (for ≤14 days) with suspected COVID-19 or a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community. Participants were randomly assigned using response adaptive randomisation to usual care only, usual care plus oral doxycycline (200 mg on day 1, then 100 mg once daily for the following 6 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The interventions reported in this manuscript are usual care plus doxycycline and usual care only; evaluations of other interventions in this platform trial are ongoing. The coprimary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and hospitalisation or death related to COVID-19, both measured over 28 days from randomisation and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ISRCTN, 86534580. FINDINGS: The trial opened on April 2, 2020. Randomisation to doxycyclinebegan on July 24, 2020, and was stopped on Dec 14, 2020, because the prespecified futility criterion was met; 2689 participants were enrolled and randomised between these dates. Of these, 2508 (93·3%) participants contributed follow-up data and were included in the primary analysis: 780 (31·1%) in the usual care plus doxycycline group, 948 in the usual care only group (37·8%), and 780 (31·1%) in the usual care plus other interventions group. Among the 1792 participants randomly assigned to theusual care plus doxycyclineand usual care only groups, the mean age was 61·1 years (SD 7·9); 999 (55·7%) participants were female and 790 (44·1%) were male. In the primary analysis model, there was little evidence of difference in median time to first self-reported recovery between the usual care plus doxycycline group and the usual care only group (9·6 [95% Bayesian Credible Interval [BCI] 8·3 to 11·0] days vs 10·1 [8·7 to 11·7] days, hazard ratio 1·04 [95% BCI 0·93 to 1·17]). The estimated benefit in median time to first self-reported recovery was 0·5 days [95% BCI -0·99 to 2·04] and the probability of a clinically meaningful benefit (defined as ≥1·5 days) was 0·10. Hospitalisation or death related to COVID-19 occurred in 41 (crude percentage 5·3%) participants in the usual care plus doxycycline group and 43 (4·5%) in the usual care only group (estimated absolute percentage difference -0·5% [95% BCI -2·6 to 1·4]); there were five deaths (0·6%) in the usual care plus doxycycline group and two (0·2%) in the usual care only group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with suspected COVID-19 in the community in the UK, who were at high risk of adverse outcomes, treatment with doxycycline was not associated with clinically meaningful reductions in time to recovery or hospital admissions or deaths related to COVID-19, and should not be used as a routine treatment for COVID-19. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health and Social Care, National Institute for Health Research.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Doxycycline is often used for treating COVID-19respiratory symptoms in the community despite an absence of evidence from clinical trials to support its use. We aimed to assess the efficacy of doxycycline to treat suspected COVID-19 in the community among people at high risk of adverse outcomes. METHODS: We did a national, open-label, multi-arm, adaptive platform randomised trial of interventions against COVID-19 in older people (PRINCIPLE) across primary care centres in the UK. We included people aged 65 years or older, or 50 years or older with comorbidities (weakened immune system, heart disease, hypertension, asthma or lung disease, diabetes, mild hepatic impairment, stroke or neurological problem, and self-reported obesity or body-mass index of 35 kg/m2 or greater), who had been unwell (for ≤14 days) with suspected COVID-19 or a positive PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the community. Participants were randomly assigned using response adaptive randomisation to usual care only, usual care plus oral doxycycline (200 mg on day 1, then 100 mg once daily for the following 6 days), or usual care plus other interventions. The interventions reported in this manuscript are usual care plus doxycycline and usual care only; evaluations of other interventions in this platform trial are ongoing. The coprimary endpoints were time to first self-reported recovery, and hospitalisation or death related to COVID-19, both measured over 28 days from randomisation and analysed by intention to treat. This trial is ongoing and is registered with ISRCTN, 86534580. FINDINGS: The trial opened on April 2, 2020. Randomisation to doxycycline began on July 24, 2020, and was stopped on Dec 14, 2020, because the prespecified futility criterion was met; 2689 participants were enrolled and randomised between these dates. Of these, 2508 (93·3%) participants contributed follow-up data and were included in the primary analysis: 780 (31·1%) in the usual care plus doxycycline group, 948 in the usual care only group (37·8%), and 780 (31·1%) in the usual care plus other interventions group. Among the 1792 participants randomly assigned to the usual care plus doxycycline and usual care only groups, the mean age was 61·1 years (SD 7·9); 999 (55·7%) participants were female and 790 (44·1%) were male. In the primary analysis model, there was little evidence of difference in median time to first self-reported recovery between the usual care plus doxycycline group and the usual care only group (9·6 [95% Bayesian Credible Interval [BCI] 8·3 to 11·0] days vs 10·1 [8·7 to 11·7] days, hazard ratio 1·04 [95% BCI 0·93 to 1·17]). The estimated benefit in median time to first self-reported recovery was 0·5 days [95% BCI -0·99 to 2·04] and the probability of a clinically meaningful benefit (defined as ≥1·5 days) was 0·10. Hospitalisation or death related to COVID-19 occurred in 41 (crude percentage 5·3%) participants in the usual care plus doxycycline group and 43 (4·5%) in the usual care only group (estimated absolute percentage difference -0·5% [95% BCI -2·6 to 1·4]); there were five deaths (0·6%) in the usual care plus doxycycline group and two (0·2%) in the usual care only group. INTERPRETATION: In patients with suspected COVID-19 in the community in the UK, who were at high risk of adverse outcomes, treatment with doxycycline was not associated with clinically meaningful reductions in time to recovery or hospital admissions or deaths related to COVID-19, and should not be used as a routine treatment for COVID-19. FUNDING: UK Research and Innovation, Department of Health and Social Care, National Institute for Health Research.
Authors: Ellen McKenna; Richard Wubben; Johana M Isaza-Correa; Ashanty M Melo; Aisling Ui Mhaonaigh; Niall Conlon; James S O'Donnell; Clíona Ní Cheallaigh; Tim Hurley; Nigel J Stevenson; Mark A Little; Eleanor J Molloy Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 8.786
Authors: Jamie I Forrest; Angeli Rawat; Felipe Duailibe; Christina M Guo; Sheila Sprague; Paula McKay; Gilmar Reis; Edward J Mills Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Jienchi Dorward; Ly-Mee Yu; Gail Hayward; Benjamin R Saville; Oghenekome Gbinigie; Oliver Van Hecke; Emma Ogburn; Philip H Evans; Nicholas Pb Thomas; Mahendra G Patel; Duncan Richards; Nicholas Berry; Michelle A Detry; Christina Saunders; Mark Fitzgerald; Victoria Harris; Milensu Shanyinde; Simon de Lusignan; Monique I Andersson; Christopher C Butler; Fd Richard Hobbs Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.302
Authors: Aleksandra J Borek; Katherine Maitland; Monsey McLeod; Anne Campbell; Benedict Hayhoe; Christopher C Butler; Liz Morrell; Laurence S J Roope; Alison Holmes; Ann Sarah Walker; Sarah Tonkin-Crine Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-14
Authors: Karin Hek; Lotte Ramerman; Yvette M Weesie; Anke C Lambooij; Maarten Lambert; Marianne J Heins; Janneke M T Hendriksen; Robert A Verheij; Jochen W L Cals; Liset van Dijk Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-02-25