Literature DB >> 34329389

A comparative study between the effect of reverse curve of Spee archwires and anterior bite turbos in the treatment of deep overbite cases.

Ekram M Al-Zoubi, Kazem S Al-Nimri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare deep overbite treatment using 0.016 × 0.022 nickel-titanium lower reverse curve of Spee archwire (LRCA) or metal anterior bite turbos (ABTs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 48 patients with deep overbite malocclusion were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I (age = 18.4 ± 2.8 years, overbite = 5.8 ± 0.6 mm) was treated with LRCA, while Group II (age = 18.2 ± 3.1 years, overbite = 5.2 ± 0.4 mm) was treated with ABTs bonded to the palatal surface of the upper central incisors. Two cephalograms were taken for each patient, at post-alignment stage (T1) and post-leveling stage (T2). The primary outcomes were the anteroposterior and vertical changes of the lower teeth. The secondary outcomes were the effect on upper incisor inclination and the vertical linear changes of upper teeth, to assess the sagittal and vertical skeletal changes, and to compare the duration of overbite correction.
RESULTS: 42 of the 48 patients recruited completed the study (21 in each group). At T2, the lower incisors proclined more in Group I (P ≤ .001). Both lower second molars (P ≤ .001) and lower first molars (P = .001) tipped more distally, while the lower first premolar tipped more mesially, in Group I (P < .05). All cusps of both lower molars showed more extrusion in Group II (P < .05) except for the mesial cusp of lower second molars (P = .095). The duration of overbite correction was shorter using the ABTs by 1.7 months (4.85 ± 1.56 and 3.15 ± 0.93 months for Group I and Group II, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: LRCA causes lower incisor proclination with distal tipping of lower molars, while ABTs result in lower posterior tooth extrusion.
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bite turbos; Deep overbite; Reverse curve archwires

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34329389      PMCID: PMC8691468          DOI: 10.2319/020921-117.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  14 in total

1.  Leveling the curve of Spee with a continuous archwire technique: a long term cephalometric study.

Authors:  Rael L Bernstein; Charles B Preston; Judith Lampasso
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Consistency of orthodontic treatment decisions relative to diagnostic records.

Authors:  U K Han; K W Vig; J A Weintraub; P S Vig; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Maxillary incisor proclination effect on the position of point A in Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Kazem S Al-Nimri; Abdalla M Hazza'a; Rami M Al-Omari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  A longitudinal study of anterior vertical overbite from eight to twenty years of age.

Authors:  E O Bergersen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A principle of arcial growth of the mandible.

Authors:  R M Ricketts
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Documented leveling of the lower arch using metallic implants for reference.

Authors:  D L Mitchell; W L Stewart
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1973-05

7.  The control of vertical overbite in clinical orthodontics.

Authors:  F F Schudy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A comparison of the Ricketts and Tweed-type arch leveling techniques.

Authors:  M L Dake; P M Sinclair
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Bioprogressive therapy: overbite reduction with the lower utility arch.

Authors:  D G Greig
Journal:  Br J Orthod       Date:  1983-10

10.  How important are lateral cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic treatment planning?

Authors:  Louis Devereux; David Moles; Susan J Cunningham; Mary McKnight
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.