Literature DB >> 34328937

(Eco)toxicological tests for assessing impacts of chemical stress to aquatic ecosystems: Facts, challenges, and future.

Lara M Schuijt1, Feng-Jiao Peng2, Sanne J P van den Berg3, Milou M L Dingemans4, Paul J Van den Brink3.   

Abstract

Monitoring of chemicals in the aquatic environment by chemical analysis alone cannot completely assess and predict the effects of chemicals on aquatic species and ecosystems. This is primarily because of the increasing number of (unknown) chemical stressors and mixture effects present in the environment. In addition, the ability of ecological indices to identify underlying stressors causing negative ecological effects is limited. Therefore, additional complementary methods are needed that can address the biological effects in a direct manner and provide a link to chemical exposure, i.e. (eco)toxicological tests. (Eco)toxicological tests are defined as test systems that expose biological components (cells, individuals, populations, communities) to (environmental mixtures of) chemicals to register biological effects. These tests measure responses at the sub-organismal (biomarkers and in vitro bioassays), whole-organismal, population, or community level. We performed a literature search to obtain a state-of-the-art overview of ecotoxicological tests available for assessing impacts of chemicals to aquatic biota and to reveal datagaps. In total, we included 509 biomarkers, 207 in vitro bioassays, 422 tests measuring biological effects at the whole-organismal level, and 78 tests at the population- community- and ecosystem-level. Tests at the whole-organismal level and biomarkers were most abundant for invertebrates and fish, whilst in vitro bioassays are mostly based on mammalian cell lines. Tests at the community- and ecosystem-level were almost missing for organisms other than microorganisms and algae. In addition, we provide an overview of the various extrapolation challenges faced in using data from these tests and suggest some forward looking perspectives. Although extrapolating the measured responses to relevant protection goals remains challenging, the combination of ecotoxicological experiments and models is key for a more comprehensive assessment of the effects of chemical stressors to aquatic ecosystems.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioassays; Biomarkers; Ecological risk assessment; Ecotoxicity tests; Effect-based methods; Extrapolation; Monitoring

Year:  2021        PMID: 34328937     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  Agricultural surface water, imidacloprid, and chlorantraniliprole result in altered gene expression and receptor activation in Pimephales promelas.

Authors:  Sarah A Stinson; Simone Hasenbein; Richard E Connon; Xin Deng; Jordan S Alejo; Sharon P Lawler; Erika B Holland
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Toxicity Effects of Combined Mixtures of BDE-47 and Nickel on the Microalgae Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bacillariophyceae).

Authors:  Xiaolai Shi; Ruoyu Guo; Douding Lu; Pengbin Wang; Xinfeng Dai
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-04-22

3.  Single and Mixture Toxicity of Boron and Vanadium Nanoparticles in the Soil Annelid Enchytraeus crypticus: A Multi-Biomarker Approach.

Authors:  Ana Capitão; Joana Santos; Angela Barreto; Mónica J B Amorim; Vera L Maria
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 5.719

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.