Objective: This study examines Argentinean health care workers in order to 1) test self-perceived job performance levels and the presence of psychological symptoms compatible with common mental disorders, and 2) examine within-person changes in general discomfort and psychological distress, adjusting for demographic factors, region, and health-related factors during two time points of the COVID-19 pandemic.Method: This longitudinal study comprised 305 healthcare workers who completed a survey at two time points approximately 4 months apart. We used the General Health Questionnaire and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale to measure mental health outcomes. To address the first aim we calculated differences (Student's t test for paired samples) and correlations (Pearson's r coefficient). To address the second aim we used fixed effects model by means of a multilevel approach, a linear model that considers dependency in the data. Results: Self-perceived job performance deteriorated across time. From the first measurement to the four-month follow-up, more health care workers presented common mental disorders (40% vs 45.57%), depression, and/or anxiety (52.46% vs 62.62%). A meaningful worsening of mental health was observed in healthcare workers who expressed concern about being infected with COVID-19, whether asymptomatic (greater general discomfort and psychological distress) or symptomatic (greater general discomfort). Likewise, there were significant interactions between a history of mental disorder and concern about COVID-19 infection.Conclusions: Among healthcare workers, the uncertainty about the COVID-19 infection may have larger negative mental health impacts than actually being infected.
Objective: This study examines Argentinean health care workers in order to 1) test self-perceived job performance levels and the presence of psychological symptoms compatible with common mental disorders, and 2) examine within-person changes in general discomfort and psychological distress, adjusting for demographic factors, region, and health-related factors during two time points of the COVID-19 pandemic.Method: This longitudinal study comprised 305 healthcare workers who completed a survey at two time points approximately 4 months apart. We used the General Health Questionnaire and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale to measure mental health outcomes. To address the first aim we calculated differences (Student's t test for paired samples) and correlations (Pearson's r coefficient). To address the second aim we used fixed effects model by means of a multilevel approach, a linear model that considers dependency in the data. Results: Self-perceived job performance deteriorated across time. From the first measurement to the four-month follow-up, more health care workers presented common mental disorders (40% vs 45.57%), depression, and/or anxiety (52.46% vs 62.62%). A meaningful worsening of mental health was observed in healthcare workers who expressed concern about being infected with COVID-19, whether asymptomatic (greater general discomfort and psychological distress) or symptomatic (greater general discomfort). Likewise, there were significant interactions between a history of mental disorder and concern about COVID-19 infection.Conclusions: Among healthcare workers, the uncertainty about the COVID-19 infection may have larger negative mental health impacts than actually being infected.
Authors: Joyce P Yi-Frazier; Maeve B O'Donnell; Elizabeth A Adhikari; Chuan Zhou; Miranda C Bradford; Samantha Garcia-Perez; Kelly J Shipman; Samantha E Hurtado; Courtney C Junkins; Alison O'Daffer; Abby R Rosenberg Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-07-01
Authors: Flávia L Osório; Antonio Waldo Zuardi; Isabella L M Silveira; José Alexandre S Crippa; Jaime Eduardo Cecílio Hallak; Karina Pereira-Lima; Sonia R Loureiro Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: J Alonso; G Vilagut; I Alayo; M Ferrer; F Amigo; A Aragón-Peña; E Aragonès; M Campos; I Del Cura-González; I Urreta; M Espuga; A González Pinto; J M Haro; N López Fresneña; A Martínez de Salázar; J D Molina; R M Ortí Lucas; M Parellada; J M Pelayo-Terán; A Pérez Zapata; J I Pijoan; N Plana; M T Puig; C Rius; C Rodriguez-Blazquez; F Sanz; C Serra; R C Kessler; R Bruffaerts; E Vieta; V Pérez-Solá; P Mortier Journal: Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 7.818
Authors: Alice Dunning; Kevin Teoh; James Martin; Johanna Spiers; Marta Buszewicz; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Anna Kathryn Taylor; Anya Gopfert; Maria Van Hove; Louis Appleby; Ruth Riley Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-08-23 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Lauren A Peccoralo; Robert H Pietrzak; Jordyn H Feingold; Shumayl Syed; Chi C Chan; James W Murrough; Carly Kaplan; Jaclyn Verity; Adriana Feder; Dennis S Charney; Steven M Southwick; Jonathan A Ripp Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2022-01-22 Impact factor: 2.851
Authors: Antonio Lasalvia; Luca Bodini; Francesco Amaddeo; Stefano Porru; Angela Carta; Ranieri Poli; Chiara Bonetto Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-19 Impact factor: 3.390