Changgui Shi1, Bin Sun1, Guoke Tang1,2, Ning Xu1, Hailong He1, Xiaojian Ye1,2, Guohua Xu3, Xin Gu4. 1. Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China. xuguohuamail@smmu.edu.cn. 4. Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 415 Fengyang Road, Shanghai, 200003, People's Republic of China. guxin2004ty@163.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of using endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with a preoperative planning software in the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (Jan 2018 and June 2019). These patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the conventional group (group A) underwent endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and decompression. Patients in the experimental group (group B) underwent the same surgery assisted with a preoperative software. The total operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up). The modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the global outcome at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in group B had shorter operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and less number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken, as compared with group A. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than pre-operation for both groups at all follow-ups. No significant difference was observed between these two groups. Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate was 86.4% in group A and 90.5% in group B, respectively. After the operation, no patients had residual osteophytes in group B, while two patients still had residual osteophytes and foraminal stenosis in group A. CONCLUSION: For endoscopic surgery treating lumbar foraminal stenosis, using preoperative planning software could reduce the puncture-channel establishment time, operation time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken without affecting the clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE: To assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of using endoscopic foraminoplasty and decompression assisted with a preoperative planning software in the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis. METHODS: This retrospective study included 43 patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (Jan 2018 and June 2019). These patients were divided into two groups. Patients in the conventional group (group A) underwent endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty and decompression. Patients in the experimental group (group B) underwent the same surgery assisted with a preoperative software. The total operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken were recorded. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered preoperatively and postoperatively (at 1-month, 3-month, and 12-month follow-up). The modified MacNab criteria were used to assess the global outcome at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS:Patients in group B had shorter operation time, puncture-channel establishment time, and less number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken, as compared with group A. The VAS and ODI scores were significantly lower than pre-operation for both groups at all follow-ups. No significant difference was observed between these two groups. Based on the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate was 86.4% in group A and 90.5% in group B, respectively. After the operation, no patients had residual osteophytes in group B, while two patients still had residual osteophytes and foraminal stenosis in group A. CONCLUSION: For endoscopic surgery treating lumbar foraminal stenosis, using preoperative planning software could reduce the puncture-channel establishment time, operation time, and the number of intraoperative fluoroscopic images taken without affecting the clinical outcomes.