Literature DB >> 34327246

An Experimental Evaluation of an Online Interview Scheduler: Effects on Fieldwork Outcomes.

Katherine McGonagle1, Narayan Sastry2.   

Abstract

In recent years, household surveys have expended significant effort to counter well-documented increases in direct refusals and greater difficulty contacting survey respondents. A substantial amount of fieldwork effort in panel surveys using telephone interviewing is devoted to the task of contacting the respondent to schedule the day and time of the interview. Higher fieldwork effort leads to greater costs and is associated with lower response rates. A new approach was experimentally evaluated in the 2017 wave of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) Transition into Adulthood Supplement (TAS) that allowed a randomly selected subset of respondents to choose their own day and time of their telephone interview through the use of an online appointment scheduler. TAS is a nationally representative study of US young adults aged 18-28 years embedded within the worlds' longest running panel study, the PSID. This paper experimentally evaluates the effect of offering the online appointment scheduler on fieldwork outcomes, including number of interviewer contact attempts and interview sessions, number of days to complete the interview, and response rates. We describe panel study members' characteristics associated with uptake of the online scheduler and examine differences in the effectiveness of the treatment across subgroups. Finally, potential cost-savings of fieldwork effort due to the online appointment scheduler are evaluated.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Contact strategies; Data collection; Fieldwork effort; Nonresponse; Panel study; Response rate; Young adults

Year:  2020        PMID: 34327246      PMCID: PMC8308971          DOI: 10.1093/jssam/smaa031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol        ISSN: 2325-0984


  8 in total

1.  Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation: description and an illustration.

Authors:  R M Groves; E Singer; A Corning
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  The Effects of a Between-Wave Incentive Experiment on Contact Update and Production Outcomes in a Panel Study.

Authors:  Katherine A McGonagle; Robert F Schoeni; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.920

3.  Effectiveness of a Time-Limited Incentive on Participation by Hard-to-Reach Respondents in a Panel Study.

Authors:  Paula Fomby; Narayan Sastry; Katherine A McGonagle
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2016-10-13

4.  The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: Overview, Recent Innovations, and Potential for Life Course Research.

Authors:  Katherine A McGonagle; Robert F Schoeni; Narayan Sastry; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Longit Life Course Stud       Date:  2012

5.  Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.

Authors:  Robert F Schoeni; Frank Stafford; Katherine A McGonagle; Patricia Andreski
Journal:  Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci       Date:  2013-01

6.  Use of a Targeted Sequential Mixed Mode Protocol in a Nationally Representative Panel Study.

Authors:  Vicki A Freedman; Katherine A McGonagle; Mick P Couper
Journal:  J Surv Stat Methodol       Date:  2017-07-06

7.  Pre-Survey Text Messages (SMS) Improve Participation Rate in an Australian Mobile Telephone Survey: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Eleonora Dal Grande; Catherine Ruth Chittleborough; Stefano Campostrini; Maureen Dollard; Anne Winifred Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cohort Profile: The Panel Study of Income Dynamics' Child Development Supplement and Transition into Adulthood Study.

Authors:  Katherine A McGonagle; Narayan Sastry
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 9.685

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.