| Literature DB >> 34327237 |
Michele Ines Kanko Mbekou1, Darline Dize1, Victorine Lorette Yimgang1, Fred Djague1, Rufin Marie Kouipou Toghueo1, Norbert Sewald2, Bruno Njakou Lenta3, Fabrice Fekam Boyom1.
Abstract
Emerging drug-resistant bacteria creates an urgent need to search for antibiotics drugs with novel mechanisms of action. Endophytes have established a reputation as a source of structurally novel secondary metabolites with a wide range of biological activities. In the present study, we explore the antibacterial potential of endophytic fungi isolated from different tissues of Terminalia mantaly, Terminalia catappa, and Cananga odorata. The crude ethyl acetate extracts of 56 different endophytic fungi were screened against seven bacterial strains using the broth microdilution method. The antibacterial modes of action of the most active extracts (04) were evaluated using E. coli ATCC 25922 and H. influenzae ATCC 49247 strains. Both the DPPH and FRAP assays were used to investigate their antioxidant activity, and their cytotoxicity against the Vero cell line was evaluated using the MTT assay. Out of the 56 crude extracts tested, about 13% were considered very active, 66% partially active, and 21% nonactive against all tested bacterial strains with MIC values ranging from 0.32 μg/mL to 25 μg/mL. The four more potent extracts (MIC <5 μg/mL) (from Aspergillus sp. N454, Aspergillus sp. N13, Curvularia sp. N101, and Aspergillus sp. N18) significantly lysed the bacteria cells, increased outer membrane permeability, reduced salt tolerance, and inhibited bacterial catalase activity. They exhibited a DPPH free radical scavenging activity with IC50 ranging from 150.71 to 936.08 μg/mL. Three of the four potent extracts were noncytotoxic against the Vero cells line (CC50 > 100 μg/mL). Results from this investigation demonstrated that endophytes from Cameroonian medicinal plants might content potent antibacterial metabolites. The bioguided fractionation of these potent extracts is ongoing to isolate and characterise potential active ingredients.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34327237 PMCID: PMC8302376 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6697973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the most potent extracts on bacteria strains. The errors bars represent the standard deviation of measurement of a sample in three separate runs. (a) Aspergillus sp. N454. (b) Curvularia sp. N101. (c) Aspergillus sp. N18. (d) Aspergillus sp. N13. SA: Staphylococcus aureus; EC: Escherichia coli; SP: Streptococcus pneumoniae; HI: Haemophilus influenzae; PA: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; KP: Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Figure 2Bacteriolytic activity of endophytic fungi extracts on E. coli ATCC 25922 and H. influenzae ATCC 49247. (a) Aspergillus sp. N454 on E. coli. (b) Aspergillus sp. N18 on E. coli. (c) Aspergillus sp. N13 on E. coli. (d) Curvularia sp. N101 on E. coli. (e) Aspergillus sp. N454 on H. influenzae. (f) Aspergillus sp. N18 on H. influenzae. (g) Aspergillus sp. N13 on H. influenzae. (h) Curvularia sp. N101 on H. influenzae. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; NC: negative control.
Figure 3Total nucleotide leakage from (a) Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and (b) Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247 treated with different endophytic fungi extracts at their MIC concentration. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 4Effect of endophytic fungi extracts on the membrane permeability of (a) H. influenzae ATCC 49247 and (b) E. coli ATCC 25922. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD.
Figure 5Effect of potent extracts on reducing salt tolerance of (a) E. coli ATCC 25922 and (b) H. influenzae ATCC 49247 at the MIC concentration. The error bars represent the standard deviation of measurement of a sample in three separate sample runs. ns: nonsignificant; ∗∗∗: significantly different compared to the untreated samples (p < 0.001); ∗∗: significantly different compared to the untreated samples (p < 0.01).
Figure 6Effect of endophytic fungi extracts on catalase activity of Escherichia coli and Haemophilus influenzae at the MIC concentration. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Values with different letters express a significant difference at p < 0.05. EC: Escherichia coli; HI: Haemophilus influenzae.
DPPH radical (IC50) and RC50 of fungi extract and cytotoxicity (CC50). Means ± SD.
| Fungi name | IC50 ( | RC50 ( | CC50 ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 250 ± 0.350c | 760 ± 0.07b | 14.28 ± 5.86 |
|
| >1000 | >1000 | >100 |
|
| 150.71 ± 0.02b | >1000 | >100 |
|
| 936.08 ± 1.93d | >1000 | >100 |
| Ascorbic acid | 2.71 ± 0.08a | 13.94 ± 0.27a | — |
Values carrying the same letter superscripts are not significantly different (p > 0.05). IC50: inhibitory concentration 50 of DPPH radical; RC50: Fe3+-reducing concentration 50; CC50: cytotoxic concentration 50; SD: standard deviation. Data are presented as mean values ± standard deviation of triplicate experiments.