Literature DB >> 34326914

REGULARIZED BRAIN READING WITH SHRINKAGE AND SMOOTHING.

Leila Wehbe1, Aaditya Ramdas1, Rebecca C Steorts2, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi3.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging measures how the brain responds to complex stimuli. However, sample sizes are modest, noise is substantial, and stimuli are high dimensional. Hence, direct estimates are inherently imprecise and call for regularization. We compare a suite of approaches which regularize via shrinkage: ridge regression, the elastic net (a generalization of ridge regression and the lasso), and a hierarchical Bayesian model based on small area estimation (SAE). We contrast regularization with spatial smoothing and combinations of smoothing and shrinkage. All methods are tested on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from multiple subjects participating in two different experiments related to reading, for both predicting neural response to stimuli and decoding stimuli from responses. Interestingly, when the regularization parameters are chosen by cross-validation independently for every voxel, low/high regularization is chosen in voxels where the classification accuracy is high/low, indicating that the regularization intensity is a good tool for identification of relevant voxels for the cognitive task. Surprisingly, all the regularization methods work about equally well, suggesting that beating basic smoothing and shrinkage will take not only clever methods, but also careful modeling.

Keywords:  fMRI; regularization; shrinkage; small area estimation; spatial smoothing

Year:  2016        PMID: 34326914      PMCID: PMC8317475          DOI: 10.1214/15-aoas837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  15 in total

1.  Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain.

Authors:  N Tzourio-Mazoyer; B Landeau; D Papathanassiou; F Crivello; O Etard; N Delcroix; B Mazoyer; M Joliot
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  Dynamic predictions: oscillations and synchrony in top-down processing.

Authors:  A K Engel; P Fries; W Singer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Overview of fMRI analysis.

Authors:  S M Smith
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Neuronal gamma-band synchronization as a fundamental process in cortical computation.

Authors:  Pascal Fries
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 12.449

Review 5.  The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: where do we stand?

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 6.  What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging.

Authors:  Stefan Haufe; Frank Meinecke; Kai Görgen; Sven Dähne; John-Dylan Haynes; Benjamin Blankertz; Felix Bießmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Predicting human brain activity associated with the meanings of nouns.

Authors:  Tom M Mitchell; Svetlana V Shinkareva; Andrew Carlson; Kai-Min Chang; Vicente L Malave; Robert A Mason; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Encoding and decoding in fMRI.

Authors:  Thomas Naselaris; Kendrick N Kay; Shinji Nishimoto; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Tracking neural coding of perceptual and semantic features of concrete nouns.

Authors:  Gustavo Sudre; Dean Pomerleau; Mark Palatucci; Leila Wehbe; Alona Fyshe; Riitta Salmelin; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.