| Literature DB >> 34326842 |
Chaoyang Li1, Lizhen Li1, Meng Sun2, Jianzhi Sun1, Linlin Shao1, Miao Xu1, Yu Hou1, Jun Peng1,3,4, Lin Wang1, Ming Hou1,3,4.
Abstract
Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune hemorrhagic disease. Endothelial cell activation/injury has been found in some autoimmune diseases including SLE, systemic sclerosis, and rheumatoid arthritis, but its role in ITP pathogenesis remains unclear. This study attempted to elucidate the correlation between endothelial dysfunction and disease severity of ITP and find related markers to predict response to low-dose decitabine treatment. Compared with healthy volunteers, higher plasma levels of soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and Angiopoietin-2 were found in adult corticosteroid resistant ITP patients. Notably, ICAM-1 levels were negatively correlated with the platelet count, and positively associated with the bleeding score. Recently, we have reported the efficacy and safety of low-dose decitabine in adult patients with ITP who failed for the first line therapies. Here, we evaluated the correlation of plasma ICAM-1 level with the efficacy of low-dose decitabine therapy for corticosteroid resistant ITP. A total of 29 adult corticosteroid resistant ITP patients who received consecutive treatments of low-dose decitabine were enrolled in this study. Fourteen patients showed response (nine showed complete response and five showed partial response). The levels of ICAM-1 before and after treatment were significantly higher in the non-responsive ITP patients than in the responsive patients. As shown in the multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of developing no-response to low-dose decitabine increased by 36.8% for per 5 ng/ml increase in plasma ICAM-1 level [odds ratio (OR) 1.368, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.060 to 1.764]. In summary, this was the first study to elucidate the relationship between endothelial dysfunction and corticosteroid resistant ITP and identify the potential predictive value of ICAM-1 level for response to low-dose decitabine.Entities:
Keywords: ICAM-1; decitabine; endothelia cell dysfunction; immune thrombocytopenia; predict
Year: 2021 PMID: 34326842 PMCID: PMC8313967 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.689663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographic and characteristics.
| Normal (n = 30) | ITP (n = 88) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 32 (19–56) | 48 (15–84) |
|
| 53 (16) | 66 (58) |
|
| 246 (195–285) | 10 (1–83) |
|
| ||
| 0 | 20 (18) | |
| 1 | 42 (37) | |
| 2 | 16 (14) | |
| 3 | 14 (12) | |
| 4 | 3 (3) | |
| 5 | 2 (2) | |
| 6 | 2 (2) | |
|
| ||
| Corticosteroid | 100 (88) | |
| rhTPO | 39 (34) | |
| Eltrombopag | 36 (32) | |
| Rituximab | 45 (40) | |
| Intravenous Immunoglobulin | 70 (62) |
Figure 1The biomarkers of endothelial activation and vascular integrity. (A) Plasma soluble Angiopoietin-2 concentration, (B) plasma soluble ICAM-1 concentration, and (C) plasma soluble VEGF concentration were significantly higher in adult corticosteroid resistant ITP patients (n = 88 compared with healthy volunteers n = 30). However, (D) plasma soluble Angiopoietin-1 concentration, (E) plasma soluble Fractalkine concentration, and (F) plasma soluble E-selectin concentration between adult corticosteroid resistant ITP patients and healthy volunteers show no markedly difference. Significance between these two groups was determined by Student’s t-test. Data are expressed as box-whisker plots: the central horizontal line, lower and upper of boxes depict the median, first quartile, and third quartile respectively; and the whisker extends to the minimal and maximal data point.
Figure 2Correlation between initial plasma Angiopoietin-2/ICAM-1 and clinical variables in 88 corticosteroid resistant ITP patients. By Pearson’s correlation coefficient analyses, we found negative correlation between ICAM-1 and platelet count (A), but no obvious association between Angiopoietin-2 and platelet count (C). Meanwhile, we found positive correlation between ICAM-1 and bleeding score (B), but no significant association between Angiopoietin-2 and bleeding score (D). All variables are log transformed.
Angiopoietin-2 and ICAM-1 concentrations in corticosteroid resistant ITP patients stratified by platelet count at enrollment.
| Platelet count (109/L) | <10 (n = 44) | 10–29 (n = 26) | 30–100 (n = 18) | Normal (n = 30) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 85 (63–103)† ‡ | 73 (55–107)† | 84 (64–92)† | 35 (24–48) | <0.05 |
|
| 1,346 | 1,809 | 1,501 | 606 (463–872) | <0.0001 |
†Significant vs. Normal (n = 20) using a Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums.
‡Significant vs. Platelet count 30–100 (n = 10) using a Dunn’s test of multiple comparisons using rank sums.
IQR, interquartile range.
Figure 3Plasma concentrations of Angiopoietin-2 (A) and ICAM-1 (B) at enrollment in healthy volunteers (Normal) and 29 corticosteroid resistant ITP patients who received consecutive low-dose decitabine therapy, including 15 responders (R) and 14 non-responders (NR).
Personal and laboratory characteristics of 29 corticosteroid resistant ITP patients who received consecutive low-dose decitabine therapy.
| Total (n = 29) | R (n = 15) | NR (n = 14) | P (R | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 43 (15–84) | 39 (15–65) | 49 (20–84) | 0.275 |
|
| 69 (20) | 67 (10) | 71 (10) | 0.362 |
|
| 3 (1–12) | 3 (1–12) | 4 (1–12) | 0.276 |
|
| ||||
| Corticosteroid | 100 (29) | 100 (15) | 100 (14) | – |
| rhTPO | 52 (15) | 40 (6) | 64 (9) | 0.191 |
|
| 17 (5) | 13 (2) | 21 (3) | 0.564 |
|
| 41 (12) | 40 (6) | 43 (6) | 0.597 |
|
| ||||
| At enrollment | 7 (1–65) | 6 (1–65) | 6 (1–21) | 0.442 |
| At end of observation | 35 (0–266) | 119 (35–266) | 7 (0–35) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| At enrollment | 3 (0–11) | 3 (0–6) | 3 (0–11) | 0.946 |
| At end of observation | 0 (0–3) | 0 (0–0) | 2 (0–3) | <0.001 |
|
| ||||
| At enrollment | 92 (59–121) | 80 (50–92) | 121 (77–152) | 0.005 |
| At end of observation | 103 (70–136) | 75 (66–108) | 123 (100–157) | 0.026 |
|
| ||||
| At enrollment | 1,559 (1,091–1,716) | 1,291 (866–1,007) | 1,633 (1262–1,837) | 0.138 |
| At end of observation | 1,366 (1,027–1,778) | 1,102 (999–1,436) | 1,650(1167–1,852) | 0.163 |
Mann–Whitney U test.
Fisher exact or chi-square test.
R, responder; NR, non-responder; IQR, interquartile range.
Logistic regression analysis evaluating predictors of no response to consecutive low-dose decitabine therapy for corticosteroid resistant ITP patients.
| OR | 95% CIr |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Uppper | |||
|
| ||||
| Age | 1.027 | 0.979 | 1.077 | 0.281 |
| Male | 2.000 | 0.446 | 8.963 | 0.365 |
| Baseline platelet | 0.947 | 0.860 | 1.043 | 0.272 |
| Angiopoietin-2 (50 ng/ml increase) | 1.084 | 0.991 | 1.186 | 0.078 |
| ICAM-1 (5 pg/ml increase) | 1.354 | 1.071 | 1.713 | 0.011 |
|
| ||||
| ICAM-1 (5 pg/ml increase) | 1.368 | 1.060 | 1.764 | 0.016 |
| Angiopoietin-2 (50 ng/ml increase) | 1.082 | 0.947 | 1.235 | 0.247 |
Subject characteristics were chosen for the univariable analysis, and only two variables are shown in the final multivariable analysis. 95% CI indicates 95% confidence interval.