Literature DB >> 34326415

The role of sheep ked (Melophagus ovinus) as potential vector of protozoa and bacterial pathogens.

Joanna Werszko1, Marek Asman2, Joanna Witecka2, Żaneta Steiner-Bogdaszewska3, Tomasz Szewczyk3, Grzegorz Kuryło4, Konrad Wilamowski4, Grzegorz Karbowiak3.   

Abstract

The sheep ked (Melophagus ovinus) hematophagous insect may act as a potential vector of vector-borne pathogens. The aim of this study was to detect the presence of Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in sheep ked collected from sheep in Poland. In total, Trypanosoma spp. was detected in 58.91% of M. ovinus, whereas Bartonella spp. and B. burgdorferi s.l. were found in 86.82% and 1.55% of the studied insects, respectively. A. phagocytophilum was not detected in the studied material. In turn, co-infection by Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. was detected in 50.39%, while co-infection with Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. and B. burgdorferi s.l. was found in 1.55% of the studied insects. The conducted study showed for the first time the presence of B. burgdorferi s. l. in M. ovinus, as well as for the first time in Poland the presence of Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. The obtained results suggest that these insects may be a potential vector for these pathogens, but further-more detailed studies are required.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34326415      PMCID: PMC8322267          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94895-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

The family Hippoboscidae (Diptera) is a group of blood-sucking flies of veterinary importance that parasitize on mammals and birds. Worldwide, the fauna of Hippoboscinae consists of more than 213 species, 21 genera and three subfamilies: (Ornithomyinae, Hippoboscinae and Lipopteinae)[1,2]. In Europe, about 30 species of hippoboscid have been described, of which 10 species are found in Poland[2,3]. The sheep ked (Melophagus ovinus) is a blood-sucking wingless ectoparasite of sheep. Their life-cycle consists of three stages: larva, pupa and adult, and occurs in the fleece of the sheep host and can be carried from one sheep to another by direct contact[4]. Although the sheep ked parasitizes mainly sheep, their incidental occurrence has also been reported in red fox, rabbit and the European bison[4,5]. This species of flies occurs in North America, Oceania, Asia, China, Africa and Europe[4,6]. The sheep keds have an economic impact by reducing the production of meat, milk and the wool of sheep, and the infestation of sheep also has harmful effects, such as: weight loss, anemia, anxiety and reduction in wool growth. In addition, skin damage due to abrasion and scratching can lead to secondary microbiological infections[4]. The sheep ked has been reported to be responsible for the transmission of zoonotic pathogens, such as: Bartonella spp., Anaplasma spp., bluetongue virus, border disease virus (BDV), Rickettsia spp., Trypanosoma spp.[6-13]. The occurrence of arthropod-borne pathogens in M. ovinus has not yet been studied in Poland. Trypanosomes (genus Trypanosoma, family Trypanosomatidae, order Kinetoplastea), are flagellated protozoa with a worldwide distribution and have been isolated from the gut of sheep ked and the blood of sheep[14]. Due to the developmental mode, it belong to the Stercorarian group. The infection of trypanosomes in the mammalian host takes place through damaged skin or mucous membranes when the trypanosomes leave the insect organism with the faeces[14]. Trypanosomiasis in animals are usually subclinical, although anaemia, leucocytosis, weight loss, neonate death and decreased milk production have been noted[15]. Anaplasma phagocytophilum causes granulocytic anaplasmosis in humans (HGE) as well tick-borne fever in ruminants, equine anaplasmosis in horses, and severe febrile diseases in dogs and cats[16]. It is Gram-negative intracellular bacteria of the family Anaplasmataceae that grow and multiply in the membrane-bound vacuoles of vertebrate and invertebrate host cells[17]. The disease is multi-systemic and causes lethargy, ataxia, loss of appetite, and weak or painful limbs. The cells most commonly infected are neutrophilic granulocytes. Humans can be the host, and the animal reservoir for A. phagocytophilum depends on the geographic region and includes many animal species, including wild animals such as rodents, carnivores, deer and domestic animals, such as cattle, goats, and sheep[18-20]. Molecular studies based on the 16S rRNA gene, two different genetic variants of A. phagocytophilum have been described. The AP-ha strain is pathogenic to both humans and animals, while the AP -variant 1 strain is infectious to animals but not to humans[21,22]. In Europe, zoonotic reservoirs of human A. phagocytophilum strains are wild boar, the hedgehog, and possibly carnivores[23,24]. The Ixodes ricinus tick is a primary vector of this bacteria, but their presence has been also confirmed in deer keds (Lipoptena cervi) nor in some species of blood-sucking flies from the Tabanidae family[25,26]. Bartonella spp. are small, intracellular, hemotropic Gram-negative bacteria that cause long-lasting infections in their mammalian hosts and are mainly transmitted by arthropod vectors[27]. In the last 20 years, the number of Bartonella species descriped has increased rapidly, with at least 26 species now designated and with some species containing more than one subspecies[28]. The clinical manifestations of human bartonellosis depend on the species of the infecting Bartonella, and most often manifest as various cardiovascular, neurological and rheumatological conditions[28]. Tsai and co-authors[29] showed that in recent decades a variety of insect vectors and mammal hosts have been associated with Bartonella sp. infections. Bartonella species were identified mainly based on PCR amplification in a wide range of hematophagous arthropods. These bacterial pathogens were detected in human lice (Pediculus humanus), cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis), sand flies (Lutzomyia verrucarum), and various hard tick species, such as Rhipicephalus sanguineus and varoius species from genera Ixodes spp., Dermacentor spp., Haemaphysalis spp.[30]. Lyme disease, a mul-systemic, chronic, and often clinically diverse human disease is caused by the spirochetes of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Spirochaetia, order Spirochaetales, family Spirochaetaceae). The B. burgdorferi s.l. complex consist of 22 genospecies, of which 11 are circulating in Europe and five of them, namely B. afzelii, B. garini, B. burgdorferii sensu stricto., B. spielmanii, B. bavariensis, are pathogenic to humans and associated with human Lyme disease[31,32]. Blood-sucking flies, such as the deer fly, horse fly and flea, have been found to be infected with B. burgdorferi s.l. in Europe and North America[33,34]. These pathogens have been described recently in sheep ked in China[9]. In the current study, a molecular screening was conducted of sheep keds for the presence of Trypanosoma spp. Anaplasma spp. Bartonella spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. pathogens in sheep ked collected from a sheep farm near the Białowieża Primeval Forest in north-eastern Poland. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first report to confirm the presence of these pathogens in sheep ked in Poland. Evidence is provided that two (Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp.) and three pathogens (Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. and B. burgdorferi s.l.) can co-infect sheep ked (Melophagus ovinus).

Results

In total, 129 M. ovinus (69 ♀; 60 ♂) were collected from sheep (Fig. 1)The presence Trypanosoma spp. was detected in 76 of the 129 (58.91%) studied insects. In turn, Bartonella spp. was found in 122 of the 129 (86.82%) flies. The presence of B. burgdorferi s.l. was detected in 2 of the 129 (1.55%) sheep keds, whereas no A. phagocytophilum was detected in the tested group of insects. The positivity to protozoan and bacterial pathogens DNA among female and male M. ovinus from different locations is given in Table 1. Co-infection with the two pathogens Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp was detected in 65 of the 129 (50.39%) M. ovinus, whereas co-infection with Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. and B. burgdorferi s.l was detected in only 2 of the 129 (1.55%) sheep keds (Fig. 2). In the current study, A. phagocytophilum was not detected in the tested group of flies.
Figure 1

Female of Melophagus ovinus dorsal (A) and ventral view (B), posterior end (C) and male of Melophagus ovinius dorsal (D) and ventral view (E); Posterior end (F).

Table 1

Specimens of Melophagus ovinus analysed for Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection.

The prevalence of pathogens infections in %LocationOverall
RzepiskaNowoberezowoWaliłyGródek
Trypanosoma spp.M. ovinusAnalyzed232818069
Infected21714042
M. ovinusAnalyzed1511151960
Infected15201734
TotalAnalyzed38393319129
Infected369141776 (58.91%)
Bartonella spp.M. ovinusAnalyzed232818069
Infected232418065
M. ovinusAnalyzed1511151960
Infected128131447
TotalAnalyzed38393319129
Infected35323114112 (86.82%)
Borrelia burgdorferi s.lM. ovinusAnalyzed232818069
Infected00000
M. ovinusAnalyzed1511151960
Infected00022
TotalAnalyzed38393319129
Infected00022 (1.55%)
Anaplasma spp.M. ovinusAnalyzed232818069
Infected00000
M. ovinusAnalyzed1511151960
Infected00000
TotalAnalyzed38393319129
Infected00000
Figure 2

Total percentage of co-infection with Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in flies collected from the studied areas.

Female of Melophagus ovinus dorsal (A) and ventral view (B), posterior end (C) and male of Melophagus ovinius dorsal (D) and ventral view (E); Posterior end (F). Specimens of Melophagus ovinus analysed for Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. and Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection. Total percentage of co-infection with Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. in flies collected from the studied areas. Sequence analysis showed that four partial rpoB gene sequences of Bartonella spp. (Gen Bank Accession No., MW929188, MW929189, MW929190, MW92919) were identical to each other and showed 100% identity with Bartonella melophagi from sheep ked from the USA (EF605288). In total, eight partial 18S rDNA sequences of Trypanosoma spp. were obtained in the current study, three of which (Acc. No., MZ014571, MZ014572, MZ014565) shared 100% similarity with Trypanosoma melophagium from M. ovinus in the United Kingdom and Croatia (FN666409, HQ664912). While the other five sequences (Acc. No., MZ014566, MZ014567, MZ014568, MZ014569, MZ014570) showed 100% identity with Trypanosoma sp. from Lipoptena fortisetosa in Poland (MT393991). Analysis of two partial fla B gene nucleotide sequences of B. burgdorferi s.l. (GenBank Acc. No., MW929186, MW929187) obtained in this study showed that they were identical to each other, and shared 100% similarity with B. burgdorferi strains from Ixodes ricinus ticks in Poland (MK604273, MK604272, MF150052, KX64620, KF422802, HM345911), Switzerland (KF422803) and Serbia (AB189460) and with B. burgdorferi isolates obtained from the human serum of a patient with Lyme in the Czech Republic (FJ231333–FJ231335). This result confirm the presence of strain typical for Middle Europe. Moreover, they were also identical with B. burgdorferi from cotton mouse (Peromyscus gossypinus) from the USA (EU220782). Statistical comparisons (Table 2) revealed that there were three significant associations between variables, i.e., for prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. on M. ovinus and sampling location (X2 = 51.8768, p ≤ 0.01) and for prevalence of any of examined pathogens on M. ovinus and sampling location (X2 = 15.6845, p ≤ 0.01) as well as for prevalence of Bartonella spp. on M. ovinus and subject gender (X2 = 7.064, p ≤ 0.01). All of the other associations tested were not statistically significant.
Table 2

Statistics of the chi-square tests performed to examine associations between prevalences of (i) Trypanosoma spp., (ii) Bartonella spp., (iii) Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum on Melophagus ovinus and (i) sampling location, (ii) sex of M. ovinus.

VariablesMelophagus ovinus infected/non-infected by
Sampling location (I—Waliły, II—Gródek, III—Rzepiska, IV—Nowoberezowo)

Trypanosoma spp.

X2 (3, N = 129) = 51.8768*, p < 0.00001

Bartonella spp.

X2 (3, N = 129) = 6.0301, p = 0.11015

Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum

X2 (3, N = 516) = 15.6845*, p = 0.00132

Sex of M. ovinus (♀—females, ♂—males)

Trypanosoma spp.

X2 (1, N = 129) = 0.2342, p = 0.62842

Bartonella spp.

X2 (1, N = 129) = 7.064*, p = 0.00786

Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum

X2 (1, N = 516) = 0.9664, p = 0.32559

*The result is significant at p ≤ 0.01.

Statistics of the chi-square tests performed to examine associations between prevalences of (i) Trypanosoma spp., (ii) Bartonella spp., (iii) Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum on Melophagus ovinus and (i) sampling location, (ii) sex of M. ovinus. Trypanosoma spp. X2 (3, N = 129) = 51.8768*, p < 0.00001 Bartonella spp. X2 (3, N = 129) = 6.0301, p = 0.11015 Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum X2 (3, N = 516) = 15.6845*, p = 0.00132 Trypanosoma spp. X2 (1, N = 129) = 0.2342, p = 0.62842 Bartonella spp. X2 (1, N = 129) = 7.064*, p = 0.00786 Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Anaplasma phagocytophilum X2 (1, N = 516) = 0.9664, p = 0.32559 *The result is significant at p ≤ 0.01.

Discussion

The sheep keds in this study were collected in north-eastern Poland, recognized as an endemic region with a high risk of tick-borne disease infection. Despite that, in Poland there is no official data about sheep ked and their role in the transmission of pathogens and their vector competency for infectious agents. The study records for the first time in Poland the presence of a protozoan (Trypanosoma spp.) and bacteria (Bartonella spp., B. burgdorferi s.l. and A. phagocytophilum) in sheep ked by using molecular methods. The results obtained indicate a high positivity of Trypanosoma spp. infection among sheep ked collected in Poland (58.91%), although a higher prevalence (82.4%) of trypanosomes was recorded for St Kilda sheep ked in the Outer Hebrides, Scotland[35]. In the current study, a high frequency of Bartonella spp. (86.82%) in M. ovinus was found, with similar results obtained by Halos et al.[30] who detected this bacteria in all specimens in the tested group of sheep ked in Europe. Similarly, Kumsa et al.[11] noted a high positivity of B. melophagi infection (88.6%) in sheep ked collected in Africa. Moreover, Rudolf et al.[12] identified B. melophagi in sheep keds in Central Europe, in which all investigated pools (399 specimens) of keds were positive for Bartonella spp. Similarly, in Algeria, 36.87% of sheep ked were infected with Bartonella spp.[13]. The results obtained in the current study show for the first time in Europe evidence of B. burgdorferi s.l. in M. ovinus collected from sheep. However, this bacteria was evident in only 1.5% of the studied insects. The study conducted in China by Chu et al.[9] showed a twice as high percentage in M. ovinus infected with B. garinii and B. valaisiana (related group of B. burgdorferi s.l). In the presented study, DNA of A. phagocytophilum was not detected in the tested group of flies, while Hornok et al.[8] detected the presence DNA of Anaplasma ovis in all (81 specimens) of sheep ked collected from sheep in Hungary. In Algieria, 25.88% of the M. ovinus were infected by bacteria from the Anaplasmataceae family[13]. In a study conducted by Zhang et al.[36] the infection rates were 39.1%, 17.4%, and 9.8% for A. ovis, A. bovis, and A. phagocytophilum in M. ovinus, respectively. The mixed infection of sheep keds with two bacterial genus, Bartonella and Anaplasma, were noted, with frequency co-infection at 18.64%[13]. The obtained results also demonstrated that two pathogens, Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp., can co-infect the same sheep ked. The presence of Trypanosoma spp., Bartonella spp., and B. burgdorferi s.l. pathogens in M. ovinus collected from sheep may be related to their biology. The sheep ked spends its entire life cycle on the host; however, adults may circulate among the animals of the same herd, and are commonly transferred from ewes to their offspring[4]. Hippoboscids are also likely to be mechanical vectors of infectious agents due to their blood feeding behavior[37]. Some pathogens may be transferred from an infected host to non-infected individuals through their mouthparts[38], although the keds were probably infected through receiving the pathogens from sheep. However, it is interesting that keds and sheep are generally thought to be reservoirs incompetent for B. burgdorferi s.l.[9,39]. In the current study, the keds probably acquired the B. burgdorferi s.l infections via co-feeding transmission when one infected Ixodes spp. tick infected a ked feeding nearby. At this stage of the study, it is difficult to explain this speculation. This is the first report in Europe on the detection of B. burgdorferi s.l. DNA in sheep keds. Recently, vertical transmission of A. ovis in sheep keds has been described[13,40]. The presence of Bartonella DNA in all of the M. ovinus samples, even at the pupal stage, has been described[30]. This provides new evidence for the potential of these flies as mechanical or biological vectors[13]. Due to the results of statistically significant comparisons (chi-square tests) between prevalence of Trypanosoma spp. and Bartonella spp. on M. ovinus versus sampling location and sex of the flie further research on this subject should be carried out. In conclusion, this study provides the first molecular evidence of the presence of DNA of Trypanosoma spp, Bartonella spp., B. burgdoreferi s.l. in a tested group of sheep ked. Detection of the pathogen in M. ovinus is important evidence that other blood-sucking flies, including hippoboscid flies, are important candidates as potential vectors of infectious diseases.

Materials and methods

Adult M. ovinus were collected during veterinary procedures from sheep on four sheep farms located near forest areas in north-eastern Poland, located in the villages of Rzepiska (52° 49′ 56″ N, 23° 33′ 56″ E), Nowoberezowo (52° 45′ 36″ N, 23° 33′ 43″ E), Waliły (53° 08′ 30″ N, 23° 35′ 25″ E), Gródek (52° 05′ 48″ N, 23° 39′ 24″ E). After collection, the flies were preserved in pure 70% ethanol for further morphological and molecular processing. Before identification, specimens were rinsed in pure water (Direct-Pure® adept Ultrapure Lab Water Systems, RephiLe Bioscience, Ltd. China) and air-dried. Gender determination and species identification were carried out using taxonomic keys, according to Borowiec[3] under an OPTA-TECH microscope (Warsaw, Poland). The DNA was isolated from single individuals by using a Genomic Mini AX Tissue kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland), according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. Concentration was measured spectrophotometrically at 260/280 nm wave length. Isolated material was stored at − 20 °C until further molecular analysis. Pathogens in M. ovinus were detected by PCR and nested PCR methos. The detection of Trypanosoma spp. was based on PCR amplification of a 18S rDNA gene fragment of approximately 650 bp. Two oligonucleotide primers, TrypF 150 and TrypR 800, were used, as previously described[41]. For amplification, a 200 ng DNA template was used, and for the reactions Allegro Taq DNA Polymerase (Novazym, Poznań, Poland), was used, and to detect Bartonella spp., a pair of primers—1400F and 2300R—were used to amplify an 850 bp fragment of the rpoB gene[42]. PCR reactions were conducted according to Paziewska et al.[43]. For the reaction mixture, RUN Taq polymerase (A&A Biotechnology, Gdynia, Poland) was used. In turn, B. burgdorferi s.l., was detected in insects with the use of the two pairs of primers specific to the fla B gene fragment, as previously described[44]. For amplification, a 200 ng DNA template was used. In turn, for the re-amplification, 1 µl of the amplification product was used. DFS-Plus DNA Taq Polymerase (GeneOn, Germany) was used for both reactions. The presence of 824 bp and 605 bp reaction products were considered positive. Anaplasma phagocytophilum was detected in M. ovinus with the use of two pairs of primers specific to the 16S rDNA gene fragment, as previously described[45]. A 200 ng DNA template and 1 µl of amplification product were used for amplification and re-amplification, respectively. For both reactions, Taq DNA Polymerase (EURx, Poland) was used. The presence of 932 bp and 546 bp reaction products were considered positive. PCR and nested PCR products were visualized on 1% and 2% ethidium bromide stained agarose gels. Next, gels were visualized using ChemiDoc, MP Lab software (Imagine, BioRad, Hercules, USA) or Omega 10 (UltraLum, USA) and TotalLab software (TotalLab, UK). The positive products of PCR and nested PCR were purified using the QIAEX II Gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) or Agarose-Out DNA Purification Kit (EURx, Poland), and sequenced by Genomed (Warsaw, Poland). Next, the sequences were assembled into contigs using ContigExpress, Vector NTI Advance 11.0 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, New York, USA). The sequences were then aligned with reference sequences available in GenBank by BLAST (BasicLocal Alignment Search Tool) and analyzed using MEGA 5.0 software. X2 statistical analyses were performed to examine the relation between the prevalence data and: (i) sampling locations as well as (ii) sex of M. ovinus, and the 5% level of probability was set for rejection of the null hypothesis.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.
  38 in total

1.  First molecular evidence of Anaplasma ovis and Rickettsia spp. in keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) of sheep and wild ruminants.

Authors:  Sándor Hornok; José de la Fuente; Nóra Biró; Isabel G Fernández de Mera; Marina L Meli; Vilmos Elek; Eniko Gönczi; Theres Meili; Balázs Tánczos; Róbert Farkas; Hans Lutz; Regina Hofmann-Lehmann
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.133

Review 2.  The parasitic fauna of the European bison (Bison bonasus) (Linnaeus, 1758) and their impact on the conservation. Part 1. The summarising list of parasites noted.

Authors:  Grzegorz Karbowiak; Aleksander W Demiaszkiewicz; Anna M Pyziel; Irena Wita; Bożena Moskwa; Joanna Werszko; Justyna Bień; Katarzyna Goździk; Jacek Lachowicz; Władysław Cabaj
Journal:  Acta Parasitol       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.440

Review 3.  The increasing recognition of rickettsial pathogens in dogs and people.

Authors:  William L Nicholson; Kelly E Allen; Jennifer H McQuiston; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Susan E Little
Journal:  Trends Parasitol       Date:  2010-03-06

Review 4.  A review of Melophagus ovinus (L.), the sheep ked.

Authors:  Richard W Small
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 2.738

5.  Comparison of the reservoir competence of medium-sized mammals and Peromyscus leucopus for Anaplasma phagocytophilum in Connecticut.

Authors:  Michael L Levin; William L Nicholson; Robert F Massung; John W Sumner; Durland Fish
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.133

6.  Ticks and biting insects infected with the etiologic agent of Lyme disease, Borrelia burgdorferi.

Authors:  L A Magnarelli; J F Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Role of Hippoboscidae flies as potential vectors of Bartonella spp. infecting wild and domestic ruminants.

Authors:  Lénaïg Halos; Taoufik Jamal; Renaud Maillard; Benjamin Girard; Jacques Guillot; Bruno Chomel; Muriel Vayssier-Taussat; Henri-Jean Boulouis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Wild boars as hosts of human-pathogenic Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants.

Authors:  Jerzy Michalik; Joanna Stańczak; Stella Cieniuch; Maria Racewicz; Bożena Sikora; Mirosława Dabert
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Borrelia miyamotoi and Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu lato) identification and survey of tick-borne encephalitis virus in ticks from north-eastern Germany.

Authors:  Cristian Răileanu; Oliver Tauchmann; Ana Vasić; Elisabeth Wöhnke; Cornelia Silaghi
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 10.  Ecological fitness and strategies of adaptation of Bartonella species to their hosts and vectors.

Authors:  Bruno B Chomel; Henri-Jean Boulouis; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Rickie W Kasten; Muriel Vayssier-Taussat; Richard J Birtles; Jane E Koehler; Christoph Dehio
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 3.683

View more
  1 in total

1.  First determination of DNA virus and some additional bacteria from Melophagus ovinus (sheep ked) in Tibet, China.

Authors:  Yong-Hong Liu; Yi-Min Ma; Hong-Ou Tian; Bo Yang; Wen-Xiong Han; Wei-Hong Zhao; Hai-Liang Chai; Zhan-Sheng Zhang; Li-Feng Wang; Lei Chen; Yu Xing; Yu-Lin Ding; Li Zhao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 6.064

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.