Literature DB >> 34326370

Sociodemographic characteristics of missing data in digital phenotyping.

Mathew V Kiang1, Jarvis T Chen2, Nancy Krieger2, Caroline O Buckee3, Monica J Alexander4,5, Justin T Baker6,7, Randy L Buckner8,9,10, Garth Coombs8, Janet W Rich-Edwards3,11, Kenzie W Carlson12, Jukka-Pekka Onnela13.   

Abstract

The ubiquity of smartphones, with their increasingly sophisticated array of sensors, presents an unprecedented opportunity for researchers to collect longitudinal, diverse, temporally-dense data about human behavior while minimizing participant burden. Researchers increasingly make use of smartphones for "digital phenotyping," the collection and analysis of raw phone sensor and log data to study the lived experiences of subjects in their natural environments using their own devices. While digital phenotyping has shown promise in fields such as psychiatry and neuroscience, there are fundamental gaps in our knowledge about data collection and non-collection (i.e., missing data) in smartphone-based digital phenotyping. In this meta-study using individual-level data from six different studies, we examined accelerometer and GPS sensor data of 211 participants, amounting to 29,500 person-days of observation, using Bayesian hierarchical negative binomial regression with study- and user-level random intercepts. Sensitivity analyses including alternative model specification and stratified models were conducted. We found that iOS users had lower GPS non-collection than Android users. For GPS data, rates of non-collection did not differ by race/ethnicity, education, age, or gender. For accelerometer data, Black participants had higher rates of non-collection, but rates did not differ by sex, education, or age. For both sensors, non-collection increased by 0.5% to 0.9% per week. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using smartphone-based digital phenotyping across diverse populations, for extended periods of time, and within diverse cohorts. As smartphones become increasingly embedded in everyday life, the insights of this study will help guide the design, planning, and analysis of digital phenotyping studies.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34326370     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94516-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  5 in total

1.  Shared and unique brain network features predict cognitive, personality, and mental health scores in the ABCD study.

Authors:  Jianzhong Chen; Angela Tam; Valeria Kebets; Csaba Orban; Leon Qi Rong Ooi; Christopher L Asplund; Scott Marek; Nico U F Dosenbach; Simon B Eickhoff; Danilo Bzdok; Avram J Holmes; B T Thomas Yeo
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 2.  Smartphones for musculoskeletal research - hype or hope? Lessons from a decennium of mHealth studies.

Authors:  Anna L Beukenhorst; Katie L Druce; Diederik De Cock
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.562

3.  Mobile footprinting: linking individual distinctiveness in mobility patterns to mood, sleep, and brain functional connectivity.

Authors:  Cedric Huchuan Xia; Ian Barnett; Tinashe M Tapera; Azeez Adebimpe; Justin T Baker; Danielle S Bassett; Melissa A Brotman; Monica E Calkins; Zaixu Cui; Ellen Leibenluft; Sophia Linguiti; David M Lydon-Staley; Melissa Lynne Martin; Tyler M Moore; Kristin Murtha; Kayla Piiwaa; Adam Pines; David R Roalf; Sage Rush-Goebel; Daniel H Wolf; Lyle H Ungar; Theodore D Satterthwaite
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 8.294

4.  Understanding the Predictors of Missing Location Data to Inform Smartphone Study Design: Observational Study.

Authors:  Anna L Beukenhorst; Jamie C Sergeant; David M Schultz; John McBeth; Belay B Yimer; Will G Dixon
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Using Smartphones to Reduce Research Burden in a Neurodegenerative Population and Assessing Participant Adherence: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Two Observational Studies.

Authors:  Anna L Beukenhorst; Katherine M Burke; Zoe Scheier; Timothy M Miller; Sabrina Paganoni; Mackenzie Keegan; Ella Collins; Kathryn P Connaghan; Anna Tay; James Chan; James D Berry; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.