Qian Wang1, Fang Zhou2, Justin T Snow3, Aylin Simsir2, Osvaldo Hernandez2, Pascale Levine2, Oliver Szeto2, Wei Sun2, Babak Givi4, Tamar C Brandler5. 1. Department of Pathology and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Pathology and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York. 3. Department of Pathology and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Jacksonville, Florida. 4. Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York. 5. Department of Pathology and New York University Langone Health, New York, New York. Electronic address: Tamar.brandler@nyumc.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus for interpretation of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cytology preparations. Our study aims to assess p16 IHC staining in formalin-fixed cytology cell blocks (CBs) from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens in comparison with surgical pathology p16 staining and to determine the reproducibility of p16 IHC scoring in CBs. METHODS: A total of 40 FNAs from 2014 to 2019 of HNSCC with p16 IHC were obtained. CB p16 staining was scored independently by 5 cytopathologists as interval percentages of tumor cell positivity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were examined to determine optimal cutoffs for each pathologist based on sensitivity and specificity values. Gwet's coefficient (AC1) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Greater than 10% was the lowest threshold to reach 100% specificity with high sensitivity (55%-84%) in all 5 raters. Rater performances were similar, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.89 to 0.95. Using the >10% threshold, Gwet's AC1 = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.56-0.89). Diagnostic performance improved further when low-cellularity cases were excluded, with AUC ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 and Gwet's AC1 = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61-0.98). CONCLUSION: p16 IHC performed on cytology CBs can serve as a surrogate marker for the detection of HPV with high sensitivity and specificity levels. Using a threshold lower than that recommended for surgical pathology for the interpretation of p16 positivity may be appropriate for FNA cytology CB preparations. All cytopathologists in our study displayed reproducible high sensitivity and specificity values at the >10% threshold.
INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus for interpretation of p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cytology preparations. Our study aims to assess p16 IHC staining in formalin-fixed cytology cell blocks (CBs) from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens in comparison with surgical pathology p16 staining and to determine the reproducibility of p16 IHC scoring in CBs. METHODS: A total of 40 FNAs from 2014 to 2019 of HNSCC with p16 IHC were obtained. CB p16 staining was scored independently by 5 cytopathologists as interval percentages of tumor cell positivity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were examined to determine optimal cutoffs for each pathologist based on sensitivity and specificity values. Gwet's coefficient (AC1) was calculated to assess inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Greater than 10% was the lowest threshold to reach 100% specificity with high sensitivity (55%-84%) in all 5 raters. Rater performances were similar, with areas under the curve (AUCs) ranging from 0.89 to 0.95. Using the >10% threshold, Gwet's AC1 = 0.72 (95% CI: 0.56-0.89). Diagnostic performance improved further when low-cellularity cases were excluded, with AUC ranging from 0.94 to 0.99 and Gwet's AC1 = 0.79 (95% CI: 0.61-0.98). CONCLUSION: p16 IHC performed on cytology CBs can serve as a surrogate marker for the detection of HPV with high sensitivity and specificity levels. Using a threshold lower than that recommended for surgical pathology for the interpretation of p16 positivity may be appropriate for FNA cytology CB preparations. All cytopathologists in our study displayed reproducible high sensitivity and specificity values at the >10% threshold.
Authors: Ming Guo; Abha Khanna; Agata A Tinnirello; Jessica Hwang; Ping Zhang; Li Xu; Guojun Li; Kristina R Dahlstrom; Erich M Sturgis; John Stewart Journal: Cancer Cytopathol Date: 2022-02-22 Impact factor: 4.264