Literature DB >> 34325986

Mutations in TP53 or DNA damage repair genes define poor prognostic subgroups in primary prostate cancer.

Cathleen Nientiedt1, Jan Budczies2, Volker Endris2, Martina Kirchner2, Constantin Schwab2, Christina Jurcic3, Rouven Behnisch4, Shirin Hoveida3, Philippa Lantwin3, Adam Kaczorowski3, Christine Geisler5, Svenja Dieffenbacher5, Fabian Falkenbach5, Desiree Franke5, Magdalena Görtz5, Martina Heller5, Ruth Himmelsbach5, Carine Pecqueux5, Mathias Rath5, Philipp Reimold5, Viktoria Schütz5, Iva Simunovic5, Elena Walter5, Luisa Hofer5, Claudia Gasch5, Gita Schönberg5, Lars Pursche5, Gencay Hatiboglu5, Joanne Nyarangi-Dix5, Holger Sültmann6, Stefanie Zschäbitz1, Stefan A Koerber7, Dirk Jäger1, Jürgen Debus7, Anette Duensing8, Peter Schirmacher2, Markus Hohenfellner5, Albrecht Stenzinger9, Stefan Duensing10.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mutations in DNA damage repair genes, in particular genes involved in homology-directed repair, define a subgroup of men with prostate cancer with a more unfavorable prognosis but a therapeutic vulnerability to PARP inhibition. In current practice, mutational testing of prostate cancer patients is commonly done late i.e., when the tumor is castration resistant. In addition, most sequencing panels do not include TP53, one of the most crucial tumor suppressor genes in human cancer. In this proof-of-concept study, we sought to extend the clinical use of these molecular markers by exploring the early prognostic impact of mutations in TP53 and DNA damage repair genes in men with primary, nonmetastatic prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy (RPX).
METHODS: Tumor specimens from a cohort of 68 RPX patients with intermediate (n = 11, 16.2%) or high-risk (n = 57, 83.8%) disease were analyzed by targeted next generation sequencing using a 37 DNA damage repair and checkpoint gene panel including TP53. Sequencing results were correlated to clinicopathologic variables as well as PSA persistence or time to PSA failure. In addition, the distribution of TP53 and DNA damage repair gene mutations was analyzed in three large publicly available datasets (TCGA, MSKCC and SU2C).
RESULTS: Of 68 primary prostate cancers analyzed, 23 (33.8%) were found to harbor a mutation in either TP53 (n = 12, 17.6%) or a DNA damage repair gene (n = 11, 16.2%). The vast majority of these mutations (22 of 23, 95.7%) were detected in primary tumors from patients with high-risk features. These mutations were mutually exclusive in our cohort and additional data mining suggests an enrichment of DNA damage repair gene mutations in TP53 wild-type tumors. Mutations in either TP53 or a DNA damage repair gene were associated with a significantly worse prognosis after RPX. Importantly, the presence of TP53/DNA damage repair gene mutations was an independent risk factor for PSA failure or PSA persistence in multivariate Cox regression models.
CONCLUSION: TP53 or DNA damage repair gene mutations are frequently detected in primary prostate cancer with high-risk features and define a subgroup of patients with an increased risk for PSA failure or persistence after RPX. The significant adverse impact of these alterations on patient prognosis may be exploited to identify men with prostate cancer who may benefit from a more intensified treatment.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; DNA damage repair; Prostate cancer; TP53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34325986     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  4 in total

Review 1.  Precision intervention for prostate cancer: Re-evaluating who is at risk.

Authors:  Alexandros Papachristodoulou; Cory Abate-Shen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 9.756

Review 2.  Ofeleein i mi Vlaptin-Volume II: Immunity Following Infection or mRNA Vaccination, Drug Therapies and Non-Pharmacological Management at Post-Two Years SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jannis Kountouras; Dimitra Gialamprinou; Georgios Kotronis; Apostolis Papaefthymiou; Eleftheria Economidou; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Elisabeth Vardaka; Dimitrios Chatzopoulos; Maria Tzitiridou-Chatzopoulou; Dimitrios David Papazoglou; Michael Doulberis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.430

3.  Comprehensive analysis of TP53 and SPOP mutations and their impact on survival in metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Yiming Lai; Shengmeng Peng; Chen Tang; Yongming Chen; Lingfeng Li; Hai Huang; Zhenghui Guo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 4.  Circulating Tumor DNA as a Cancer Biomarker: An Overview of Biological Features and Factors That may Impact on ctDNA Analysis.

Authors:  Estela Sánchez-Herrero; Roberto Serna-Blasco; Lucia Robado de Lope; Víctor González-Rumayor; Atocha Romero; Mariano Provencio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 5.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.