Literature DB >> 34325492

Immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients with Covid-19: More data, but still complicated.

Madeleine R Heldman1, Olivia S Kates1, Cynthia E Fisher1, Ajit P Limaye1.   

Abstract

"Outcomes of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients: a matched cohort study" by Pereira et al found similar 28 day mortality among hospitalized SOT recipients and comorbidity matched controls, shedding light on the relationship between immunosuppression and Covid-19 outcomes.
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Covid-19; immunosuppression; solid organ transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34325492      PMCID: PMC8420417          DOI: 10.1111/tid.13650

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis        ISSN: 1398-2273


intensive care unit lung transplant recipients reduction of immunosuppression solid organ transplant When Covid‐19 emerged as a global pandemic, there were concerns that immunosuppression would predispose solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients and other immunocompromised populations to more severe or fatal disease than the general population. These concerns stemmed from past experience with other respiratory viruses and from early reports of high mortality in SOT recipients. Advanced age and comorbidities that are prevalent among SOT recipients have been consistently shown to be associated with mortality in Covid‐19, but the impact of immunosuppression on disease course in SOT recipients is less clear. The study by Pereira et al adds to a growing body of literature demonstrating that SOT recipients hospitalized for Covid‐19, when carefully matched for established non‐immunosuppression factors, have similar mortality to non‐SOT patients., , , , , , Thus, chronic immunosuppression by itself may not independently increase the risk of death in SOT recipients who have progressed to require hospitalization for Covid‐19. Pereira et al performed a retrospective cohort study of 117 SOT recipients and 350 non‐SOT controls, propensity‐matched on the basis of age, sex, race, ethnicity, and the presence of obesity, hypertension, and diabetes. SOT recipients were more likely to receive Covid‐19 specific therapies and more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), but there was no significant difference in mortality by 28 days between the SOT and non‐SOT cohorts (23.08% vs 23.14%, respectively, P = .21). The authors postulate that chronic immunosuppression may modulate the detrimental hyperinflammatory state associated with later stages of severe Covid‐19. Similar findings have been reported in other matched cohort investigations that compared SOT and non‐SOT patients hospitalized with COVID‐19, supporting the generalizability of these results (Table 1).
TABLE 1

Matched Cohort Studies of SOT Recipients and General Populations with Covid‐19

StudySOT subjectsMortality among SOTrAdditional outcomes among SOTrMatched cohortMortality among matched cohortComparison to non‐SOTR

Hadi et al3, a

1740 Kidney

418 Liver

262 Heart

180 Lung

At 30 d

10.2% (hospitalized)

4.8 (overall)

At 60 d

12.6% (hospitalized)

6% (overall)

31% Required hospitalization

11% Required ICU

6.7% Required mechanical ventilation

25% Developed AKI

Matched 1:1 for age, gender, race, diabetes, HTN, CAD, CHF, chronic lung disease, nicotine dependence, BMI

At 30 d

10.3% (hospitalized)

4.8% (overall)

At 60 d

12.5% (hospitalized)

5.8% (overall)

No difference in overall or hospitalized mortality at 30 d or 60 d

SOTR had a higher rate of hospitalization and acute kidney injury

Webb & Marjot et al4 151 Liver

22% (hospitalized)

19% (overall)

82% Required hospitalization

31% Required ICU

20% Required mechanical ventilation

Matched 1:1 for age, gender, ethnicity, diabetes, HTN, baseline creatinine, obesity27% (overall) No difference in overall mortality
Colmenero & Rodríguez‐ Perálvarez et al5 111 Liver

20.8% (hospitalized)

18% (overall)

86.5% required hospitalization

11% required ICU

Age‐ and gender‐ adjusted standardized mortality ratio from 21 717 general population patients14.8% (overall)

No difference in overall mortality

SOTR had a higher incidence of COVID‐19 diagnosis

Molnar et al6

*restricted to ICU patients only

67 Kidney

13 Liver

13 Heart

4 Lung

1 Pancreas

40% (ICU)

80% Required mechanical ventilation

37% Required RRT

Matched 1:1 for age, gender, race, ethnicity, diabetes, HTN, CAD, CHF, atrial fibrillation, chronic lung disease, CKD, chronic liver disease, active malignancy, HIV, nicotine dependence, chronic medication use, BMI43% (ICU) No difference in ICU mortality at 28 d
Miarons et al7

30 Kidney

13 Lung

3 Liver

37% (hospitalized)

22% Required ICU

24% Developed AKI

Matched 1:4 for age, gender, and Charlson comorbidity index23% (hospitalized)

No difference in hospitalized mortality at 28 d

Trend toward higher mortality in SOTR largely attributable to excess mortality among lung SOTR

Ringer et al8 30 SOTR13% (hospitalized)

30% Required ICU

27% Required mechanical ventilation

7% Required RRT

Matched 1:2 for age, diabetes, HTN, BMI13% (hospitalized) No difference in hospitalized mortality at 28 d

The study by Hadi et al uses the same data source as the previous study by Mansoor et al, which found no significant difference in overall mortality between liver transplant recipients with COVID‐19 and a matched general population cohort.

Matched Cohort Studies of SOT Recipients and General Populations with Covid‐19 Hadi et al, 1740 Kidney 418 Liver 262 Heart 180 Lung At 30 d 10.2% (hospitalized) 4.8 (overall) At 60 d 12.6% (hospitalized) 6% (overall) 31% Required hospitalization 11% Required ICU 6.7% Required mechanical ventilation 25% Developed AKI At 30 d 10.3% (hospitalized) 4.8% (overall) At 60 d 12.5% (hospitalized) 5.8% (overall) No difference in overall or hospitalized mortality at 30 d or 60 d SOTR had a higher rate of hospitalization and acute kidney injury 22% (hospitalized) 19% (overall) 82% Required hospitalization 31% Required ICU 20% Required mechanical ventilation 20.8% (hospitalized) 18% (overall) 86.5% required hospitalization 11% required ICU No difference in overall mortality SOTR had a higher incidence of COVID‐19 diagnosis Molnar et al *restricted to ICU patients only 67 Kidney 13 Liver 13 Heart 4 Lung 1 Pancreas 80% Required mechanical ventilation 37% Required RRT 30 Kidney 13 Lung 3 Liver 22% Required ICU 24% Developed AKI No difference in hospitalized mortality at 28 d Trend toward higher mortality in SOTR largely attributable to excess mortality among lung SOTR 30% Required ICU 27% Required mechanical ventilation 7% Required RRT The study by Hadi et al uses the same data source as the previous study by Mansoor et al, which found no significant difference in overall mortality between liver transplant recipients with COVID‐19 and a matched general population cohort. The concept that post‐transplant immunosuppressive therapy could either be neutral or even advantageous in severe infection is not unique to Covid‐19. In a recent prospective, matched cohort of patients with gram‐negative or Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, there was no significant difference in mortality between SOT and non‐SOT patients. SOT recipients were less likely to develop septic shock than nontransplant patients and had lower levels of IL‐2 and other proinflammatory cytokines, supporting a potential advantageous role of immunosuppression in the setting of infection‐mediated immune dysregulation. Use of corticosteroids to suppress excessive inflammation is also an important component of the treatment for several infections in which the host inflammatory response is thought to be detrimental, including pneumococcal meningitis, tuberculous meningitis and pericarditis, and severe pneumocystis pneumonia. Available data suggest that the pathogenesis of Covid‐19 evolves over the course of infection, with high‐grade viral replication predominating during the earlier phase and intense and dysregulated inflammation later in the course of disease. Thus, the effects of immunosuppression may vary by disease stage. While corticosteroids are beneficial in late severe disease, immunosuppression during the early phases of disease may ultimately cause harm by promoting viral replication, as high SARS‐CoV‐2 viral loads are associated with increased mortality. If SOT recipients are more likely to progress to disease severe enough to require hospitalization, the overall case fatality in Covid‐19 may indeed be higher among SOT recipients compared to comorbidity matched controls, even if there is no difference in mortality among the fraction of patients who require hospitalization. Pereira et al's study and other investigations that focus on hospitalized patients do not asses the potential impact of early phase immunosuppression (ie, maintenance immunosuppression in SOT recipients) on Covid‐19 mortality. An additional challenge in assessing the relationship between immunosuppression and Covid‐19 mortality is the frequent reduction of immunosuppression (RIS) as a strategy to promote viral clearance during all stages Covid‐19 infection. Although the number of SOT recipients who received RIS after Covid‐19 diagnosis was not reported in Pereira et al's study, a large multicenter investigation of SOT recipients (80% of whom were hospitalized) found that maintenance immunosuppression was reduced in 70% of cases. Thus, the overall intensity of immunosuppression during hospitalization for severe Covid‐19 may not reflect the baseline (ie, pre‐Covid‐19) immunosuppressive state in SOT recipients. The association between RIS and Covid‐19 mortality has not been assessed in large prospective randomized trials, but the potential impact (either harm or benefit) of RIS after Covid‐19 diagnosis on mortality must be considered when interpreting findings from studies that compare hospitalized SOT recipients to control populations. While short‐term mortality among SOT recipients is similar to that of comorbidity‐matched non‐SOT patients hospitalized for Covid‐19, there may be differential effects in specific subgroups of SOT recipients. The risk of severe and fatal viral infections due to unchecked viral replication is theoretically highest in the early post‐transplant period when the effects of induction agents on lymphocyte count and function are the most profound. A series of case reports of fatal peri‐transplant Covid‐19 among SOT recipients raised concern that mortality from Covid‐19 may be particularly high in the early post‐transplant period. The median time from transplant to Covid‐19 in Pereira's study was 6.68 years (IQR 1.93‐10.02) and the study does not specifically address mortality earlier in the posttransplant period. In a large observational study of 482 SOT recipients, induction immunosuppression within 3 months of Covid‐19 was not associated with mortality, but the prevalence of recent induction was only 9%. Thus, the severity of Covid‐19 within the first 3‐6 months following transplant may not be fully appreciated in large heterogenous studies. Lung transplant recipients (LTR) may also be a particularly vulnerable subpopulation. Reports of inpatient mortality in LTR have ranged from 30%‐40%, exceeding the 15%‐25% mortality rates reported in general SOT cohorts that are dominated by kidney recipients., The findings from Pereira et al's study should be interpreted with caution for certain high‐risk SOT recipients. Even if SOT recipients do not have a substantially higher risk of dying after hospitalization for Covid‐19 compared to comorbidity matched controls, there may be important differences in Covid‐19 related morbidity between SOT and non‐SOT patients. Pereira et al found that SOT recipients had a small but statistically significant increase in ICU admissions (32.5% vs 27.7%, P = .01) and were more likely to receive Covid‐19 specific therapies, suggesting a possible increased risk of severe disease in SOT recipients. Several observational studies of SOT recipients with Covid‐19 demonstrated hospitalization rates of 30%‐80%, which is significantly higher than reports from the general population., These estimates may be inflated by reporting biases but might also reflect a predisposition for SOT recipients to progress to more severe disease as a result of increased viral replication during the earlier stages of infection. Furthermore, there are potential delayed or indirect consequences of Covid‐19 that specifically affect SOT recipients. Detection of SARS‐CoV‐2 in asymptomatic SOT recipients may lead to delays in post‐transplant care, including biopsies or other invasive procedures. Symptomatic respiratory viral infections in lung transplant recipient may precipitate the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), a leading cause of long‐term morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. These SOT‐specific complications are difficult to appreciate from comparative analyses that focus only on hospitalized patients and short‐term mortality, but should be considered when assessing the overall impact of Covid‐19 in SOT recipients relative to the general population. How will vaccination affect Covid‐19 morbidity and mortality in SOT recipients relative to the non‐SOT population? SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines are remarkably efficacious in preventing severe disease and death in immunocompetent adults, but efficacy in SOT recipients could be limited by immunosuppression. Humoral responses to the mRNA vaccines are diminished among SOT recipients as a result of immunosuppression, and hospitalization for severe Covid‐19 among fully vaccinated SOT recipients has been reported., Vaccines may still offer some protection against severe Covid‐19 despite incomplete humoral responses, but vaccinated SOT recipients are likely to be more vulnerable to severe infection compared to vaccinated immunocompetent adults with similar comorbidities. Pereira et al's matched‐cohort study, along with other studies, have consistently reported that SOT‐related immunosuppressive therapy may not have an independent detrimental effect on the later stages of Covid‐19 (ie, after hospitalization). However, multiple studies have reported that SOT‐related immunosuppressive therapy may significantly and negatively impact the earlier stages of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and increase the likelihood of needing hospitalization, perhaps through overly permissive viral replication. Assessments of morbidity and mortality across the spectrum of infection in SOT recipients and comorbidity matched cohorts will be necessary to fully understand the relationship between immunosuppression and outcomes during future pandemics.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interests to disclose.
  14 in total

1.  COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Matched Retrospective Cohort Study and Evaluation of Immunosuppression Management.

Authors:  Marta Miarons; María Larrosa-García; Sonia García-García; Ibai Los-Arcos; Francesc Moreso; Cristina Berastegui; Lluís Castells; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Javier Varela; Alba Pau-Parra; Carlota Varón-Galcera; Carlos-Javier Parramon-Teixidó; Javier Martínez-Casanova; Laura Domènech; Patricia García-Ortega; Pablo Sánchez-Sancho; Carla Alonso-Martínez; Laura Gómez-Ganda; Maria Roch-Santed; Ariadna Gracia-Moya; José-Manuel Del-Rio-Gutiérrez; Alfredo Guillén-Del-Castillo; Carla Sans-Pola; Andrés Antón; Bruno Montoro; Maria-Queralt Gorgas-Torner
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Lara Danziger-Isakov; Emily A Blumberg; Oriol Manuel; Martina Sester
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 3.  Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Review.

Authors:  W Joost Wiersinga; Andrew Rhodes; Allen C Cheng; Sharon J Peacock; Hallie C Prescott
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  COVID-19 infection in solid organ transplant recipients after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Authors:  Hani M Wadei; Thomas A Gonwa; Juan C Leoni; Sadia Z Shah; Nabeel Aslam; Leigh L Speicher
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 9.369

5.  Outcomes of COVID-19 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Propensity-matched Analysis of a Large Research Network.

Authors:  Yousaf B Hadi; Syeda F Z Naqvi; Justin T Kupec; Sarah Sofka; Arif Sarwari
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 5.385

6.  Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Viral Load on Risk of Intubation and Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Reed Magleby; Lars F Westblade; Alex Trzebucki; Matthew S Simon; Mangala Rajan; Joel Park; Parag Goyal; Monika M Safford; Michael J Satlin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  A retrospective matched cohort single-center study evaluating outcomes of COVID-19 and the impact of immunomodulation on COVID-19-related cytokine release syndrome in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Matthew Ringer; Veronica Azmy; Kelsey Kaman; Daiwei Tang; Harry Cheung; Marwan M Azar; Christina Price; Maricar Malinis
Journal:  Transpl Infect Dis       Date:  2021-01-22

8.  Symptomatic Respiratory Virus Infection and Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction.

Authors:  Cynthia E Fisher; Carl M Preiksaitis; Erika D Lease; Jeffrey Edelman; Katharine A Kirby; Wendy M Leisenring; Ganesh Raghu; Michael Boeckh; Ajit P Limaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Outcomes following SARS-CoV-2 infection in liver transplant recipients: an international registry study.

Authors:  Gwilym J Webb; Thomas Marjot; Jonathan A Cook; Costica Aloman; Matthew J Armstrong; Erica J Brenner; Maria-Andreea Catana; Tamsin Cargill; Renumathy Dhanasekaran; Ignacio García-Juárez; Hannes Hagström; James M Kennedy; Aileen Marshall; Steven Masson; Carolyn J Mercer; Ponni V Perumalswami; Isaac Ruiz; Sarang Thaker; Nneka N Ufere; Eleanor Barnes; Alfred S Barritt; Andrew M Moon
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-08-28

10.  Outcomes of critically ill solid organ transplant patients with COVID-19 in the United States.

Authors:  Miklos Z Molnar; Anshul Bhalla; Ambreen Azhar; Makoto Tsujita; Manish Talwar; Vasanthi Balaraman; Amik Sodhi; Dipen Kadaria; James D Eason; Salim S Hayek; Steven G Coca; Shahzad Shaefi; Javier A Neyra; Shruti Gupta; David E Leaf; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.369

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  COVID-19 in the Immunocompromised Host, Including People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus.

Authors:  Niyati Jakharia; Aruna K Subramanian; Adrienne E Shapiro
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 5.905

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.