Literature DB >> 34324928

Evaluation of a modified rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction method for Bacillus atrophaeus spores in water matrices.

Rebecca N Bushon1, Amie M G Brady2, Christopher M Kephart2, Vicente Gallardo3.   

Abstract

A rapid method that provides information on the viability of organisms is needed to protect public health and ensure that remediation efforts following a release of a biological agent are effective. The rapid viability-polymerase chain reaction (RV-PCR) method combines broth culture and molecular methods to provide results on whether viable organisms are present in less than 15 h. In this study, a modified RV-PCR (mRV-PCR) method was compared to a membrane-filtration culture method for the detection of viable Bacillus spores in water matrices. Samples included small and large volumes of chlorine and non‑chlorine treated tap water. Large volume water samples (up to 100 L), were processed by ultrafiltration using a semi-automated waterborne pathogen concentrator, followed by centrifugation as a secondary concentration technique. The concentrated samples were analyzed by mRV-PCR and culture methods. The overall agreement between the mRV-PCR and culture methods when seed concentrations were greater than 10 spores per sample volume analyzed was 96%. The total time from the start of sample processing to the final sample result for the mRV-PCR method was decreased by approximately 2 h, in comparison to the previously published RV-PCR method because of the incorporation of shorter, more efficient primary and secondary concentration steps and a shorter DNA extraction technique. Overall, this study confirmed that RV-PCR is a promising approach for identifying viable Bacillus spores in small- and large-volume water samples and for producing results in less time than traditional culture methods. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus spores; Quantitative PCR; Rapid; Ultrafiltration; Viability; Water samples

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34324928      PMCID: PMC8488907          DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106293

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Microbiol Methods        ISSN: 0167-7012            Impact factor:   2.622


  9 in total

1.  The evaluation of hollow-fiber ultrafiltration and celite concentration of enteroviruses, adenoviruses and bacteriophage from different water matrices.

Authors:  Eric R Rhodes; Emma M Huff; Douglas W Hamilton; Jenifer L Jones
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.014

2.  The use of hollow fiber dialysis filters operated in axial flow mode for recovery of microorganisms in large volume water samples with high loadings of particulate matter.

Authors:  Vicente J Gallardo; Brian J Morris; Eric R Rhodes
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 2.363

3.  Rapid-viability PCR method for detection of live, virulent Bacillus anthracis in environmental samples.

Authors:  Sonia E Létant; Gloria A Murphy; Teneile M Alfaro; Julie R Avila; Staci R Kane; Ellen Raber; Thomas M Bunt; Sanjiv R Shah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Most-probable-number rapid viability PCR method to detect viable spores of Bacillus anthracis in swab samples.

Authors:  S E Létant; S R Kane; G A Murphy; T M Alfaro; L R Hodges; L J Rose; E Raber
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 2.363

5.  Rapid, high-throughput, culture-based PCR methods to analyze samples for viable spores of Bacillus anthracis and its surrogates.

Authors:  S R Kane; S E Létant; G A Murphy; T M Alfaro; P W Krauter; R Mahnke; T C Legler; E Raber
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 2.363

6.  Detection and fate of Bacillus anthracis (Sterne) vegetative cells and spores added to bulk tank milk.

Authors:  Michael L Perdue; Jeff Karns; Jim Higgins; Jo Ann Van Kessel
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.077

7.  Comparison of traditional and molecular analytical methods for detecting biological agents in raw and drinking water following ultrafiltration.

Authors:  D S Francy; R N Bushon; A M G Brady; E E Bertke; C M Kephart; C A Likirdopulos; B E Mailot; F W Schaefer; H D Alan Lindquist
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Using ultrafiltration to concentrate and detect Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus atrophaeus subspecies globigii, and Cryptosporidium parvum in 100-liter water samples.

Authors:  H D Alan Lindquist; Stephanie Harris; Sasha Lucas; Margaret Hartzel; Diana Riner; Paul Rochele; Ricardo Deleon
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-06-23       Impact factor: 2.363

9.  A Method Detection Limit for Bacillus anthracis Spores in Water Using an Automated Waterborne Pathogen Concentrator.

Authors:  Ben Humrighouse; Adin Pemberton; Vicente Gallardo; H D Alan Lindquist; Robert LaBudde
Journal:  J AOAC Int       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.913

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.