BACKGROUND: As new diabetes technologies improve to better manage glucose levels, users' priorities for future technologies may shift to prioritize burden reduction and ease of use. We used qualitative methods to explore youth and parent desired features of an "ideal" artificial pancreas (AP) system. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 youth, ages 10-25 years, and 44 parents. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Youth (79% female, 82% non-Hispanic white) were (M ± SD) ages 17.0 ± 4.7 years, with diabetes for 9.4 ± 4.9 years, and HbA1c of 8.4 ± 1.1%; 79% were pump-treated and 82% used CGM. Of parents, 91% were mothers and 86% were non-Hispanic white. Participants suggested various ways in which an ideal AP system could reduce physical and emotional burdens of diabetes. Physical burdens could be reduced by lessening user responsibilities to manage glucose for food and exercise, and wear or carry devices. Emotional burden could be reduced by mitigating negative emotional reactions to sound and frequency of alerts, while increasing feelings of normalcy. Youth and parents differed in their suggestions to reduce emotional burden. Participants suggested features that would improve glycemia, but nearly always in the context of how the feature would directly reduce their diabetes-specific burden. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants expressed interest in improving glucose levels, the pervasive desire among suggested features of an ideal AP system was to minimize the burden of diabetes. Understanding and addressing users' priorities to reduce physical and emotional burden will be necessary to enhance uptake and maintain use of future AP systems.
BACKGROUND: As new diabetes technologies improve to better manage glucose levels, users' priorities for future technologies may shift to prioritize burden reduction and ease of use. We used qualitative methods to explore youth and parent desired features of an "ideal" artificial pancreas (AP) system. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 youth, ages 10-25 years, and 44 parents. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Youth (79% female, 82% non-Hispanic white) were (M ± SD) ages 17.0 ± 4.7 years, with diabetes for 9.4 ± 4.9 years, and HbA1c of 8.4 ± 1.1%; 79% were pump-treated and 82% used CGM. Of parents, 91% were mothers and 86% were non-Hispanic white. Participants suggested various ways in which an ideal AP system could reduce physical and emotional burdens of diabetes. Physical burdens could be reduced by lessening user responsibilities to manage glucose for food and exercise, and wear or carry devices. Emotional burden could be reduced by mitigating negative emotional reactions to sound and frequency of alerts, while increasing feelings of normalcy. Youth and parents differed in their suggestions to reduce emotional burden. Participants suggested features that would improve glycemia, but nearly always in the context of how the feature would directly reduce their diabetes-specific burden. CONCLUSIONS: Although participants expressed interest in improving glucose levels, the pervasive desire among suggested features of an ideal AP system was to minimize the burden of diabetes. Understanding and addressing users' priorities to reduce physical and emotional burden will be necessary to enhance uptake and maintain use of future AP systems.
Authors: Ariana M Chao; Karl E Minges; Chorong Park; Susan Dumser; Kathryn M Murphy; Margaret Grey; Robin Whittemore Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2015-07-30 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: Sue A Brown; Boris P Kovatchev; Dan Raghinaru; John W Lum; Bruce A Buckingham; Yogish C Kudva; Lori M Laffel; Carol J Levy; Jordan E Pinsker; R Paul Wadwa; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle; Stacey M Anderson; Mei Mei Church; Vikash Dadlani; Laya Ekhlaspour; Gregory P Forlenza; Elvira Isganaitis; David W Lam; Craig Kollman; Roy W Beck Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Terri H Lipman; Steven M Willi; C W Lai; Jennifer A Smith; Oona Patil; Colin P Hawkes Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Katharine D Barnard; Timothy Wysocki; Vanessa Ully; Julia K Mader; Thomas R Pieber; Hood Thabit; Martin Tauschmann; Lalantha Leelarathna; Sara Hartnell; Carlo L Acerini; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sibylle Dellweg; Carsten Benesch; Sabine Arnolds; Manuel Holzer; Harald Kojzar; Fiona Campbell; James Yong; Jennifer Pichierri; Peter Hindmarsh; Lutz Heinemann; Mark L Evans; Roman Hovorka Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2017-04-03
Authors: Kimberly P Garza; Aneta Jedraszko; Lindsey E G Weil; Diana Naranjo; Katharine D Barnard; Lori M B Laffel; Korey K Hood; Jill Weissberg-Benchell Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Diana Naranjo; Sakinah C Suttiratana; Esti Iturralde; Katharine D Barnard; Jill Weissberg-Benchell; Lori Laffel; Korey K Hood Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Rayhan A Lal; Marina Basina; David M Maahs; Korey Hood; Bruce Buckingham; Darrell M Wilson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 19.112