| Literature DB >> 34324101 |
C J Farah1, F N Fries2, L Latta3, B Käsmann-Kellner2, B Seitz2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To propose an optimized microsurgical and medical approach to reduce the risk of complications after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) in patients with aniridia-associated keratopathy (AAK).Entities:
Keywords: Amnion membrane transplantation; Aniridia-associated keratopathy; Autologous serum; Limbal stem cell deficiency; Penetrating keratoplasty
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34324101 PMCID: PMC8572819 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-01982-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Ophthalmol ISSN: 0165-5701 Impact factor: 2.031
Characteristics of 16 patients with congenital aniridia (25 keratoplasties)
| Patients | |
|---|---|
| Males | 6 (37,5%) |
| Females | 10 (62,5%) |
| Genetics | |
| PAX-6 | 7 (43,75%) |
| WAGR(O) | 1 (6,25%) |
| Genetically not analyzed | 8 (50%) |
| Type of Keratoplasty | |
| First keratoplasty (with or without simultaneous pannus removal) | 13 (52%) |
| Repeat keratoplasty (with or without simultaneous pannus removal) | 5 (20%) |
| Classical triple procedure (combined with cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation) | 4 (16%) |
| Pole-to-pole surgery (keratoplasty combined with lens and vitreoretinal surgery) | 2 (8%) |
| HLA-typed keratoplasty | 1 (4%) |
| History of previous surgeries before keratoplasty (Multiple choices possible) | |
| Glaucoma surgery | 11 (44%) |
| Trabeculotomy | 3 (12%) |
| Cyclophotocoagulation | 9 (36%) |
| Ahmed valve | 5 (20%) |
| Corneal surgery | 12 (48%) |
| Pannus removal (“pannectomy”) | 3 (12%) |
| Phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) | 1 (4%) |
| Penetrating keratoplasty (in domo) | 5 (20%) |
| Penetrating keratoplasty (ex domo) | 3 (12%) |
| Cataract surgery | 8 (32%) |
| Retinal surgery | 4 (24%) |
| None | 2 (8%) |
Fig. 1a Patient 1: Preoperative picture with decompensated and severely vascularized graft, 6 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Visual acuity: Hand motion (logMar 2.7). b Patient 1: 8 months postoperative picture with 26 interrupted sutures after repeat penetrating keratoplasty with Barron trephine (7.00/7.25 mm). Visual acuity has reached logMar 2.3. c Patient 2: 64-year old woman with corneal decompensation, vascularized cornea, secondary amyloidosis, and premature cataract in congenital aniridia. Visual acuity: Hand motion (logMAR 2.7). d Patient 2: Clear corneal graft, 18 months after classical excimer laser-assisted triple procedure (7.0/7.1 mm) and suture removal. Visual acuity improved to logMAR 1.0
Techniques used in 25 keratoplasties (Multiple choices possible)
| Diameter of recipient openings (diameter in mm) | |
|---|---|
| 6.5 mm | 1 (4%) |
| 7.0 mm | 14 (56%) |
| 7.5 mm | 9 (36%) |
| 12.0 mm (Limbo-keratoplasty) | 1 (4%) |
| Sutures | |
| Interrupted sutures | 18 (72%) |
| Double-running cross-stitch sutures according to Hoffmann (1976) | 7 (28%) |
| Use of simultaneous amnion membrane transplantation (Patch) | |
| Yes | 24 (96%) |
| No | 1 (4%) |
| Use of simultaneous lateral tarsorrhaphy | |
| Yes | 14 (56%) |
| No | 11 (44%) |
| Use of postoperative autologous serum eye drops primarily | |
| Yes | 19 (76%) |
| No | 6 (24%) |
| Use of long-term immunosuppressive therapy | |
| Mycophenolate mofetil | 20 (80%) |
| Cyclosporin-A | 3 (12%) |
| None | 2 (8%) |
Fig. 2Survival of corneal grafts in group 1 (complete treatment) versus group 2 (incomplete treatment). Graft survival rate after 156 weeks (3 years) was 69% in group 1 and 44% in group 2, (p = 0.39, logrank test)
Corneal complications during follow-up. n = 25 keratoplasties (100%). Group 1: Complete therapeutic modified scheme (n = 10). Group 2: Incomplete therapeutic scheme (n = 15)
| Persistent epithelial defect | |
|---|---|
| Group 1 | 3 (12%) |
| Group 2 | 2 (8%) |
| Premature suture removal/replacement | |
| Group 1 | 3 (12%) |
| Group 2 | 4 (16%) |
| Corneal endothelial decompensation | |
| Group 1 | 2 (8%) |
| Group 2 | 2 (8%) |
| Immunological graft rejection | |
| Group 1 | 0 (0%) |
| Group 2 | 2 (8%) |
| Graft ulcer/neovascularization/scarring/anterior segment fibrosis syndrome | |
| Group 1 | 1 (4%) |
| Group 2 | 4 (16%) |