W Ben Kibler1, Aaron Sciascia2, John Stuart Mattison Pike3, Michael Howell1, Kevin E Wilk4. 1. Shoulder Center of Kentucky, Lexington Clinic, Lexington, Kentucky. 2. Department of Exercise and Sport Science, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky. 3. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. 4. Champion Sports Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alterations in glenohumeral internal rotation (GIR), glenohumeral external rotation (GER), and the total arc of motion (TAM) have been linked with increased injury risk in the shoulder and elbow. These motions have been routinely measured with the forearm in neutral rotation (GIRN, GERN, TAMN). GER capacity appears to be especially important. The throwing motion, however, requires forearm pronation as GER occurs to achieve optimal cocking (GERP). No previous studies have evaluated GERP to determine GER capacity or pronated TAM (TAMP) values. HYPOTHESIS: There would be significant differences between GERN and TAMN and between GERP and TAMP. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Sixty asymptomatic male Minor League Baseball players (32 pitchers, 28 position players) participated in the study and were tested on the first day of spring training. Passive range of motion measurements were recorded using a long-arm bubble goniometer for GIRN, GERN, and GERP on both arms. TAM was calculated separately as the sum of internal and external rotational measurements under neutral and pronated conditions. RESULTS: Within pitchers and position players, all measurements were statistically reduced for the throwing arm (P ≤ 0.03) except for GERN of the pitchers. GERP measures were significantly less than GERN for both arms of each group (P < 0.01): pitchers throwing arm +11.8°/nonthrowing arm +4.8°, position players throwing arm = +8.6°/nonthrowing arm +4.0°. CONCLUSION: The forearm position of pronation, which appears to be mediated by tightness of the biceps, decreases GER capacity and TAM. GER and TAM should be calculated in neutral and pronated positions, considering that 80% of the players have a demonstrated difference between 8° and 12°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Measurement of GERP more accurately reflects the GER required in throwing, allows better quantification of the motion capacity necessary to withstand the loads in throwing, and may suggest interventions for at risk athletes.
BACKGROUND: Alterations in glenohumeral internal rotation (GIR), glenohumeral external rotation (GER), and the total arc of motion (TAM) have been linked with increased injury risk in the shoulder and elbow. These motions have been routinely measured with the forearm in neutral rotation (GIRN, GERN, TAMN). GER capacity appears to be especially important. The throwing motion, however, requires forearm pronation as GER occurs to achieve optimal cocking (GERP). No previous studies have evaluated GERP to determine GER capacity or pronated TAM (TAMP) values. HYPOTHESIS: There would be significant differences between GERN and TAMN and between GERP and TAMP. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Sixty asymptomatic male Minor League Baseball players (32 pitchers, 28 position players) participated in the study and were tested on the first day of spring training. Passive range of motion measurements were recorded using a long-arm bubble goniometer for GIRN, GERN, and GERP on both arms. TAM was calculated separately as the sum of internal and external rotational measurements under neutral and pronated conditions. RESULTS: Within pitchers and position players, all measurements were statistically reduced for the throwing arm (P ≤ 0.03) except for GERN of the pitchers. GERP measures were significantly less than GERN for both arms of each group (P < 0.01): pitchers throwing arm +11.8°/nonthrowing arm +4.8°, position players throwing arm = +8.6°/nonthrowing arm +4.0°. CONCLUSION: The forearm position of pronation, which appears to be mediated by tightness of the biceps, decreases GER capacity and TAM. GER and TAM should be calculated in neutral and pronated positions, considering that 80% of the players have a demonstrated difference between 8° and 12°. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Measurement of GERP more accurately reflects the GER required in throwing, allows better quantification of the motion capacity necessary to withstand the loads in throwing, and may suggest interventions for at risk athletes.
Entities:
Keywords:
glenohumeral external rotation; shoulder rotation; total arc of motion
Authors: Joseph B Myers; Kevin G Laudner; Maria R Pasquale; James P Bradley; Scott M Lephart Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2005-11-22 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Kevin E Wilk; Leonard C Macrina; Glenn S Fleisig; Ronald Porterfield; Charles D Simpson; Paul Harker; Nick Paparesta; James R Andrews Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2010-12-04 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Garrett S Bullock; Mallory S Faherty; Leila Ledbetter; Charles A Thigpen; Timothy C Sell Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Caroline Martin; Benoit Bideau; Nicolas Bideau; Guillaume Nicolas; Paul Delamarche; Richard Kulpa Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 6.202