Literature DB >> 34322772

Quantity discrimination in a spontaneous task in a poison frog.

Sunil Khatiwada1, Sabrina S Burmeister2.   

Abstract

The use of quantitative information underlies a range of animal behaviors. There are thought to be two parallel systems for judging quantity: a precise representation of small numbers of objects, typically less than 4, that can be tracked visually (object tracking system) and an imprecise system for larger quantities (approximate number system) governed by Weber's law. Using a spontaneous discrimination task with live prey, we examined the ability of the poison frog Dendrobates auratus to discriminate quantities of low (1-4) or high (4-16) numerosity over a range of ratio contrasts (0.33, 0.5, 0.67, 0.75). Similar to a previous study in treefrogs, we found that the poison frogs chose the larger quantity of flies when choosing between 1 and 3 and between 1 and 2. However, their performance was near chance when choosing between 2 and 3 and below chance when choosing between 3 and 4. When the numerosity of flies was higher, they did not discriminate between the larger and smaller quantity. Our findings are consistent with the ability of poison frogs to discriminate small quantities of objects using an object tracking system, but could also reflect a singular vs. plural discrimination. We did not find evidence of an approximate number system governed by Weber's law, nor evidence of a speed-accuracy tradeoff. However, total set size was associated with lower accuracy and longer latencies to choose. Future studies should explore quantity discrimination in additional contexts to better understand the limits of these abilities in poison frogs.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amphibian; Anuran; Numerical cognition; Quantity discrimination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34322772     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-021-01528-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  2 in total

1.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) sacrifice foraging speed to solve difficult colour discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Adrian G Dyer; Lars Chittka
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Prosimian primates show ratio dependence in spontaneous quantity discriminations.

Authors:  Sarah M Jones; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-12-17
  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Zebrafish excel in number discrimination under an operant conditioning paradigm.

Authors:  Angelo Bisazza; Maria Santacà
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 2.899

2.  Underestimation in temporal numerosity judgments computationally explained by population coding model.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawabe; Yusuke Ujitoko; Takumi Yokosaka; Scinob Kuroki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.996

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.