Literature DB >> 34322753

Measurement of Endotracheal Tube Positioning on Chest X-Ray Using Object Detection.

Robert J Harris1, Scott G Baginski2, Yulia Bronstein2, Shwan Kim2, Jerry Lohr2, Steve Towey2, Zeljko Velichkovich2, Tim Kabachenko2, Ian Driscoll2, Brian Baker2.   

Abstract

Patients who are intubated with endotracheal tubes often receive chest x-ray (CXR) imaging to determine whether the tube is correctly positioned. When these CXRs are interpreted by a radiologist, they evaluate whether the tube needs to be repositioned and typically provide a measurement in centimeters between the endotracheal tube tip and carina. In this project, a large dataset of endotracheal tube and carina bounding boxes was annotated on CXRs, and a machine-learning model was trained to generate these boxes on new CXRs and to calculate a distance measurement between the tube and carina. This model was applied to a gold standard annotated dataset, as well as to all prospective data passing through our radiology system for two weeks. Inter-radiologist variability was also measured on a test dataset. The distance measurements for both the gold standard dataset (mean error = 0.70 cm) and prospective dataset (mean error = 0.68 cm) were noninferior to inter-radiologist variability (mean error = 0.70 cm) within an equivalence bound of 0.1 cm. This suggests that this model performs at an accuracy similar to human measurements, and these distance calculations can be used for clinical report auto-population and/or worklist prioritization of severely malpositioned tubes.
© 2021. Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bounding box; Chest X-ray; Convolutional neural network; Endotracheal tube; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34322753      PMCID: PMC8455789          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00495-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.903


  6 in total

Review 1.  Understanding equivalence and noninferiority testing.

Authors:  Esteban Walker; Amy S Nowacki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses.

Authors:  M J Campbell; M J Gardner
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-21

3.  Chest radiography after endotracheal tube placement: is it necessary or not?

Authors:  Hooman Hossein-Nejad; Pooya Payandemehr; Seyed Ali Bashiri; Hamid Hossein-Nejad Nedai
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.469

4.  Appropriate depth of placement of oral endotracheal tube and its possible determinants in Indian adult patients.

Authors:  Manu Varshney; Kavita Sharma; Rakesh Kumar; Preeti G Varshney
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09

5.  Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Endotracheal Tube Position and X-ray Image Classification: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Paras Lakhani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Plain endotracheal tube insertion carries greater risk for malpositioning than does reinforced endotracheal tube insertion in females.

Authors:  Jin-Hee Han; Seung-Hoon Lee; Young-Jin Kang; Jong-Man Kang
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.