| Literature DB >> 34322602 |
Reiner Buchhorn1, Christoph Baumann2, Christian Willaschek1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this investigation was to examine heart rate variability (HRV), interbeat interval (IBI), and their interrelationship in healthy controls, bradycardic hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channel 4 (HCN4) mutation carriers, and patients with anorexia nervosa (AN). We tested the hypothesis that neural mechanisms cause bradycardia in patients with AN. Therefore, we assumed that saturation of the HRV/IBI relationship as a consequence of sustained parasympathetic control of the sinus node is exclusively detectable in patients with AN.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent; anorexia nervosa; autonomic nervous system; electrocardiography; heart rate
Year: 2021 PMID: 34322602 PMCID: PMC8299991 DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Health Sci Rep ISSN: 2398-8835
FIGURE 1Heart rate variability saturation effect. Respiration‐related episodic acetylcholine (ACh) release (heart rate variability [HRV] saturation on the left side, no HRV saturation on the right side). During each breathing cycle, parasympathetic‐mediated variation in heart rate (HR) naturally occurs. During inspiration, activated baroreceptors diminish vagal tone via the central autonomic network, which is followed by an increase in HR. In contrast, during expiration, baroreceptors are less active and HR decreases. In patients with anorexia nervosa, these fluctuations in the breathing cycle may attenuate at low HRs during certain sleep stages with a high parasympathetic influence. During expiration, the vagus nerve releases high amounts of ACh, which cannot be sufficiently cleaved by low acetylcholinesterase levels. , As a result, the expected decline in the concentration of ACh during inspiration in the sinus node area may not occur, and high concentrations of ACh persist during inspiration and expiration (left side). This sequence of events leads to sustained parasympathetic control of the sinus node during the whole breathing cycle, which eliminates respiratory cardiac modulation and reduces HRV at very low HRs. From: de Geus; Should heart rate variability be “corrected” for heart rate? Biological, quantitative, and interpretive considerations; CC BY 4.0; www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/psyp.13287
Patient characteristics and HRV metrics data are shown as mean ± SD
| Age (years) | Disease duration (months) | Calorie intake (kcal) | Mean night‐time IBI (ms) | RMSSD (ms) | pNN50 (%) | LnHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy controls | 14.00 ± 1.26 | ‐ | ‐ | 885.98 ± 136.54†‡ | 55.86 ± 23.84†‡ | 28.01 ± 18.26†‡ | 6.78 ± 0.97†‡ | |
| Patients with | 21.25 ± 5.91 | ‐ | ‐ | 1218.09 ± 230.93 | 124.14 ± 25.83 | 62.03 ± 8.39 | 8.46 ± 0.52 | |
| Patients with anorexia nervosa | At admission | 14.00 ± 1.34 | 8.92 ± 6.70 | 829.09 ± 416.30 | 1391.15 ± 283.94†# | 113.63 ± 48.28† | 60.86 ± 12.87† | 8.39 ± 0.82† |
| During re‐feeding | ‐ | ‐ | 2641.18 ± 416.30 | 1075.91 ± 165.41‡# | 107.90 ± 45.27‡ | 54.65 ± 17.06‡ | 8.20 ± 0.89‡ |
Note: Significant differences: controls versus patients with AN at admission ‐> †(P < 0.01); controls versus patients with AN at release ‐> ‡(P < .01); patients with AN at admission versus patients with AN at release ‐> §(P < .01).
FIGURE 2Relationship between pNN50 and interbeat interval (IBI) in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) at admission (top) and during refeeding treatment (middle) and controls (bottom). The dotted curve represents a quadratic function, whereas the straight line represents a linear function. Patients with AN at admission (quadratic function: pNN50 = −0.000068 × IBI2 + 0.203 × IBI − 85.101 R 2 = 0.21; linear function: pNN50 = 0.017 × IBI + 37.387 R 2 = 0.08). Patients with AN at release (quadratic function: pNN50 = 0.403 × IBI − 0.000150 × IBI2–200.35 R 2 = 0.60; linear function: pNN50 = 0.082 × IBI − 34.356 R 2 = 0.08). Controls (quadratic function: pNN50 = 0.249 × IBI x 2–0.00008582 × IBI − 122.074 R 2 = 0.36; linear function: pNN50 = 0.082 × IBI − 43.679 R 2 = 0.35)
Spearman's correlation coefficients. Significant differences: bold numbers = P < .01
| Patient number | Age (years) | HF‐IBI correlation at admission | HF‐IBI correlation during re‐feeding | Control number | Age (years) | HF‐IBI correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 |
|
| 1 | 12 |
|
| 2 | 13 |
|
| 2 | 13 | –0.248 |
| 3 | 14 |
| –0.035 | 3 | 14 |
|
| 4 | 14 |
|
| 4 | 14 | 0.679 |
| 5 | 13 |
| 0.196 | 5 | 13 |
|
| 6 | 16 |
|
| 6 | 16 |
|
| 7 | 13 | 0.07 |
| 7 | 13 |
|
| 8 | 13 |
|
| 8 | 13 | 0.137 |
| 9 | 13 |
|
| 9 | 13 |
|
| 10 | 14 |
| –0.066 | 10 | 14 |
|
| 11 | 12 |
|
| 11 | 12 |
|
| 12 | 15 |
|
| 12 | 15 |
|
| 13 | 16 | –0.246 |
| 13 | 16 |
|
| 14 | 14 |
|
| 14 | 14 | 0.052 |
| 15 | 16 |
|
| 15 | 16 |
|
| 16 | 15 |
|
| 16 | 15 |
|
| 17 | 16 | 0.176 | –0.24 | 17 | 15 |
|
| 18 | 15 |
|
| 18 | 15 |
|
| 19 | 13 | 0.196 |
| 19 | 13 |
|
| 20 | 13 |
|
| 20 | 14 |
|
| Negative Spearman's correlation coefficient | 8 | 7 | 1 |