Literature DB >> 34322580

Business Cards as a Mechanism to Encourage Patient Feedback About Trainees.

Marc Atzenhoefer1, Jodie Ruffin2, David Parewski3, Nicole Deklotz3, M Fuad Jan1,4, Ana Cristina Perez Moreno5, Suhail Q Allaqaband1,4.   

Abstract

This project sought to evaluate if business card distribution improved the utility of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys by serving as a feedback mechanism for trainees. Between fall 2018 and spring 2019, patient encounters for 6 cardiovascular disease fellows were tracked over two 60-day periods. Six weeks were allowed for HCAHPS surveys to be returned. Business cards were subsequently deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the control-group monitoring period, 721 patient encounters were logged and 80 (11.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback, in the form of free-response comments, was provided in 41 (51.3%) surveys. Business cards were then deployed and encounters similarly tracked. During the business card period, 508 patient encounters occurred and 97 (19.1%) surveys were returned. Qualitative feedback was provided in 52 (53.6%) surveys. No fellow-specific feedback was returned in either group. Business card use by trainees was associated with an improved rate of survey return, from 11.1% to 19.1%, but no effect on feedback to fellows or patient satisfaction scores was found. HCAHPS surveys were not useful in providing trainees with feedback. Immediate verbal feedback from patients via ancillary staff was observed. A method of relaying communication from patients to ancillary staff and medical education programs is needed.
© 2021 Aurora Health Care, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular fellowship; communication skills; domains of clinical competence; feedback; graduate medical education; patient satisfaction

Year:  2021        PMID: 34322580      PMCID: PMC8297493          DOI: 10.17294/2330-0698.1802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Patient Cent Res Rev        ISSN: 2330-068X


  8 in total

1.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Doctor Who? A Quality Improvement Project to Assess and Improve Patients' Knowledge of Their Inpatient Physicians.

Authors:  Kathleen Broderick-Forsgren; Wynn G Hunter; Ryan D Schulteis; Wen-Wei Liu; Joel C Boggan; Poonam Sharma; Steven Thomas; Aimee Zaas; Jonathan Bae
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2016-05

3.  Put a face to a name: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of providing clinician photographs on inpatients' recall.

Authors:  Lora Appel; Howard Abrams; Dante Morra; Robert C Wu
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  The AWOL Business Card.

Authors:  Peter H Van Geertruyden
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Exploring the Reality of Using Patient Experience Data to Provide Resident Feedback: A Qualitative Study of Attending Physician Perspectives.

Authors:  Steffanie Campbell; Heather Honoré Goltz; Sarah Njue; Bich Ngoc Dang
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Patient satisfaction and patient-centered care: necessary but not equal.

Authors:  Joel M Kupfer; Edward U Bond
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors: use of FACE cards.

Authors:  Vineet M Arora; Caitlin Schaninger; Michael D'Arcy; Julie K Johnson; Holly J Humphrey; James N Woodruff; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2009-12

8.  How Residents Learn From Patient Feedback: A Multi-Institutional Qualitative Study of Pediatrics Residents' Perspectives.

Authors:  Alyssa L Bogetz; Nicola Orlov; Rebecca Blankenburg; Vasudha Bhavaraju; Alisa McQueen; Caroline Rassbach
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2018-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.