| Literature DB >> 34322475 |
Wenneng Wu1, Wenjun Lan1, Chenyan Wu1, Qiang Fei1.
Abstract
In this study, 17 novel pyrimidine derivatives containing an amide moiety were synthesized. Then their in vitro antifungal activities against Botryosphaeria dothidea (B. dothidea), Phomopsis sp., and Botrytis cinereal (B. cinereal) were determined. A preliminary biological test showed that compounds 5-bromo-2-fluoro-N-(2-((2-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)oxy)phenyl)benzamide (5f) and 5-bromo-2-fluoro-N-(3-((2-methyl-6-(trifluoromethyl)pyrimidin-4-yl)oxy)phenyl)benzamide (5o) exhibited higher antifungal activity against Phomopsis sp., with an inhibition rate of 100% compared to that of Pyrimethanil at 85.1%. In particular, compound 5o exhibited excellent antifungal activity against Phompsis sp., with the EC50 value of 10.5 μg/ml, which was even better than that of Pyrimethanil (32.1 μg/ml). As far as we know, this is the first report on the antifungal activities against B. dothidea, Phomopsis sp., and B. cinereal of this series of pyrimidine derivatives containing an amide moiety.Entities:
Keywords: amide; antifungal activity; kiwifruit soft rot disease; pyrimidine; synthesize
Year: 2021 PMID: 34322475 PMCID: PMC8311460 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.695628
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
FIGURE 1Structures of pyrimidine derivatives containing an amide moiety reported in our previous works.
SCHEME 1Synthetic routes of the target compounds 5a–5q.
| The antifungal activities of the title compounds against B. dothidea, Phomopsis sp., and B. cinereal at 50 μg/ml.
| Compounds | Inhibition rate (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 75.6 ± 2.1 | 73.6 ± 2.2 | 60.3 ± 1.8 |
|
| 76.2 ± 1.3 | 81.0 ± 1.3 | 73.1 ± 1.3 |
|
| 62.5 ± 1.1 | 75.5 ± 1.8 | 80.0 ± 2.5 |
|
| 70.5 ± 1.6 | 80.2 ± 2.2 | 70.6 ± 1.2 |
|
| 54.6 ± 1.5 | 76.0 ± 1.4 | 73.3 ± 1.9 |
|
| 72.3 ± 1.9 | 100.0 ± 2.1 | 59.7 ± 2.4 |
|
| 46.8 ± 1.0 | 60.1 ± 2.0 | 73.8 ± 2.0 |
|
| 78.5 ± 2.6 | 86.1 ± 1.9 | 75.8 ± 2.6 |
|
| 82.1 ± 3.0 | 84.4 ± 2.1 | 79.6 ± 1.4 |
|
| 72.4 ± 1.9 | 78.0 ± 2.2 | 72.1 ± 3.2 |
|
| 76.9 ± 1.0 | 81.2 ± 1.8 | 77.5 ± 1.8 |
|
| 81.1 ± 1.2 | 84.5 ± 1.7 | 80.4 ± 1.2 |
|
| 48.9 ± 1.7 | 57.8 ± 1.3 | 83.6 ± 1.2 |
|
| 84.1 ± 2.3 | 91.8 ± 1.4 | 79.7 ± 2.4 |
|
| 88.5 ± 3.3 | 100.0 ± 1.0 | 84.7 ± 2.6 |
|
| 79.9 ± 1.8 | 93.4 ± 1.5 | 75.2 ± 1.2 |
|
| 54.5 ± 1.6 | 62.1 ± 1.4 | 80.5 ± 0.9 |
| Pyrimethanil | 84.4 ± 2.1 | 85.1 ± 1.4 | 82.8 ± 1.4 |
| The EC50 values of the target compounds against Phompsis sp.
| Compounds | Toxic regression equation |
| EC50 (μg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| y = 2.42x + 3.62 | 0.99 | 15.1 ± 2.0 |
|
| y = 2.38x + 4.20 | 0.99 | 10.5 ± 1.4 |
|
| y = 3.45x + 2.65 | 0.99 | 19.6 ± 2.5 |
| Pyrimethanil | y = 2.18x + 8.25 | 0.99 | 32.1 ± 2.0 |
FIGURE 2EC50 values of the target compounds 5f, 5o, and 5p against Phomopsis sp.