| Literature DB >> 34321995 |
Martin Bretzner1,2, Anna K Bonkhoff1, Markus D Schirmer1, Sungmin Hong1, Adrian V Dalca1,3,4, Kathleen L Donahue1, Anne-Katrin Giese1, Mark R Etherton1, Pamela M Rist1,5, Marco Nardin1, Razvan Marinescu1,4, Clinton Wang1,4, Robert W Regenhardt1, Xavier Leclerc2, Renaud Lopes2,6, Oscar R Benavente7, John W Cole8, Amanda Donatti9, Christoph J Griessenauer10,11, Laura Heitsch12,13, Lukas Holmegaard14, Katarina Jood14, Jordi Jimenez-Conde15, Steven J Kittner8, Robin Lemmens16,17, Christopher R Levi18,19, Patrick F McArdle20, Caitrin W McDonough21, James F Meschia22, Chia-Ling Phuah13, Arndt Rolfs23, Stefan Ropele24, Jonathan Rosand25, Jaume Roquer26, Tatjana Rundek26, Ralph L Sacco26, Reinhold Schmidt24, Pankaj Sharma27,28, Agnieszka Slowik29, Alessandro Sousa8, Tara M Stanne14, Daniel Strbian30, Turgut Tatlisumak31,32, Vincent Thijs33, Achala Vagal34, Johan Wasselius35,36, Daniel Woo37, Ona Wu3, Ramin Zand38, Bradford B Worrall39, Jane M Maguire40, Arne Lindgren41,42, Christina Jern14, Polina Golland4, Grégory Kuchcinski2, Natalia S Rost1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neuroimaging measurements of brain structural integrity are thought to be surrogates for brain health, but precise assessments require dedicated advanced image acquisitions. By means of quantitatively describing conventional images, radiomic analyses hold potential for evaluating brain health. We sought to: (1) evaluate radiomics to assess brain structural integrity by predicting white matter hyperintensities burdens (WMH) and (2) uncover associations between predictive radiomic features and clinical phenotypes.Entities:
Keywords: MRI; brain health; cerebrovascular disease (CVD); machine learning; radiomics; stroke
Year: 2021 PMID: 34321995 PMCID: PMC8312571 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.691244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 4,163).
| Age | Mean (SD) | 62.8 (15.0) |
| Female | n (%) | 1,748 (42.0%) |
| Hypertension | n (%) | 2,825 (67.9%) |
| Diabetes mellitus | n (%) | 687 (16.5%) |
| Atrial fibrillation | n (%) | 595 (14.3%) |
| Coronary artery disease | n (%) | 772 (18.5%) |
| History of smoking | n (%) | 1,331 (32.0%) |
| Prior stroke | n (%) | 539 (12.9%) |
| WMH volume | Median (IQR) | 4.2 mL (1.4–11.2) |
| NIHSS* | Median (IQR) | 3 (1–6) |
FIGURE 1Repeated out-of-sample cross-validated predictions of WMH burden. (A) Predictions of the WMH burden resulted in a coefficient of determination of R2 = 0.855 ± 0.011. Predicted and true WMH burdens show negative values due to the Box-Cox transformation of the WMH burden distribution. The bottom panels provide an illustrative example of a radiomics extraction mask (B) and a WMH mask (C).
FIGURE 2Scree plot of the explained variance per canonical function and correlation plot between the first clinical and radiomic variates. (A) Scree plot of the explained variance by canonical functions. (B) Correlation plot of the first clinical and radiomics canonical variates. Each dot represents a patient and is colored according to age. The first canonical function mainly represented age. There was a very strong correlation between the clinical and the radiomics variates of r = 0.81.
Clinical and most impactful radiomic loadings of the first two canonical functions.
| Clinical loadings | Radiomics loadings | ||||
| CF 1 | CF 2 | CF 1 | CF 2 | ||
| AF | 0.310 | 0.005 | LoG-1mm histogram 10 percentile | −0.254 | −0.128 |
| Age | 0.990 | 0.008 | LoG-1mm GLSZM large area high gray level emphasis | −0.747 | −0.008 |
| CAD | 0.260 | 0.097 | LoG-1mm GLSZM large area low gray level emphasis | −0.743 | −0.005 |
| DM | 0.127 | 0.009 | LoG-2mm GLDM gray level non uniformity | −0.514 | 0.671 |
| Hypertension | 0.381 | −0.057 | LoG-2mm GLRLM run variance | −0.241 | −0.124 |
| Female sex | 0.089 | −0.993 | LoG-2mm GLRLM short run low gray level emphasis | 0.734 | 0.097 |
| Smoking | 0.069 | 0.180 | LoG-3mm GLRLM gray level non uniformity normalized | 0.300 | −0.167 |
| LoG-3mm GLRLM short run low gray level emphasis | 0.767 | 0.073 | |||
| Original histogram 10 percentile | −0.733 | −0.071 | |||
| Original GLRLM run length non uniformity | 0.662 | 0.221 | |||
| Original GLRLM run length non uniformity normalized | 0.658 | 0.051 | |||
| Original GLRLM run variance | −0.801 | −0.013 | |||
| Original shape major axis length | −0.263 | 0.696 | |||
| Original shape maximum 2D diameter column | −0.162 | 0.745 | |||
| Original shape mesh volume | −0.608 | 0.581 | |||
| Original shape minor axis length | 0.046 | 0.709 | |||
| Original shape sphericity | −0.759 | −0.172 | |||
| Original shape surface volume ratio | 0.778 | 0.044 | |||
| Wavelet-LH GLSZM Small area high gray level emphasis | −0.413 | −0.161 | |||
FIGURE 3Bi-loading plot of the variables projected over the two first canonical functions. A bi-loading plot graphically represents both the correlation of variables with canonical functions, and the correlation between variables of each set. The position of a variable relative to an axis describes the strength of the correlation of that variable with the axis, the closer to the outer circle, the stronger the correlation. Clinical variables (red dot) and radiomic features (blue triangle) are positively correlated if close or negatively correlated if diagonally opposed. Blue tags were positioned next to correlated radiomic features representing common textural concepts. On T2 FLAIR images, younger patients had larger brains and more homogeneous brain tissue (left side of the plot) whereas older patients had more atrophic and heterogeneous brains (right side of the plot).
Clinical loadings for all seven canonical functions.
| Clinical loadings | |||||||
| Canonical function | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| AF | 0.310 | 0.005 | 0.102 | 0.020 | 0.313 | −0.596 | 0.663 |
| Age | 0.990 | 0.008 | 0.096 | 0.080 | −0.045 | 0.034 | 0.017 |
| CAD | 0.260 | 0.097 | 0.169 | −0.157 | −0.214 | −0.744 | −0.521 |
| DM | 0.127 | 0.009 | −0.443 | −0.117 | 0.781 | −0.050 | −0.401 |
| Hypertension | 0.381 | −0.057 | 0.067 | −0.916 | 0.055 | 0.058 | 0.030 |
| Female sex | 0.089 | −0.993 | −0.015 | 0.056 | −0.004 | −0.030 | 0.039 |
| Smoking | 0.069 | 0.180 | −0.903 | −0.055 | −0.347 | −0.132 | 0.081 |