Literature DB >> 34321512

Non-random associations in group housed rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Leanne Proops1, Camille A Troisi2,3, Tanja K Kleinhappel2, Teresa Romero4.   

Abstract

Ecological factors, such as predation, have traditionally been used to explain sociability. However, it is increasingly recognised that individuals within a group do not associate randomly, and that these non-random associations can generate fitness advantages. The majority of the empirical evidence on differentiated associations in group-living mammals, however, comes from a limited number of taxa and we still know very little about their occurrence and characteristics in some highly social species, such as rats (Rattus spp.). Here, using network analysis, we quantified association patterns in four groups of male fancy rats. We found that the associations between rats were not randomly distributed and that most individuals had significantly more preferred/avoided associates than expected by random. We also found that these preferences can be stable over time, and that they were not influenced by individuals' rank position in the dominance hierarchy. Our findings are consistent with work in other mammals, but contrast with the limited evidence available for other rat strains. While further studies in groups with different demographic composition are warranted to confirm our findings, the occurrence of differentiated associations in all male groups of rats have important implications for the management and welfare of captive rat populations.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34321512     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94608-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  34 in total

1.  The characteristics of rat populations.

Authors:  D E DAVIS
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1953-12       Impact factor: 4.875

2.  Social bonds between unrelated females increase reproductive success in feral horses.

Authors:  Elissa Z Cameron; Trine H Setsaas; Wayne L Linklater
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Bats are able to maintain long-term social relationships despite the high fission-fusion dynamics of their groups.

Authors:  Gerald Kerth; Nicolas Perony; Frank Schweitzer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Coping with the cold: predictors of survival in wild Barbary macaques, Macaca sylvanus.

Authors:  Richard McFarland; Bonaventura Majolo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 5.  The evolutionary origins of friendship.

Authors:  Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  The structure of social relationships among captive female giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis).

Authors:  Meredith J Bashaw; Mollie A Bloomsmith; Terry L Maple; Fred B Bercovitch
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  The benefits of social capital: close social bonds among female baboons enhance offspring survival.

Authors:  Joan B Silk; Jacinta C Beehner; Thore J Bergman; Catherine Crockford; Anne L Engh; Liza R Moscovice; Roman M Wittig; Robert M Seyfarth; Dorothy L Cheney
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Social components of fitness in primate groups.

Authors:  Joan B Silk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Stable social relationships between unrelated females increase individual fitness in a cooperative bird.

Authors:  Christina Riehl; Meghan J Strong
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Kinship shapes affiliative social networks but not aggression in ring-tailed coatis.

Authors:  Ben T Hirsch; Margaret A Stanton; Jesus E Maldonado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Social factors influence solo and rat dyads exploration of an unfamiliar open field.

Authors:  Shang Lin Tommy Lee; Saheeb Ahmed; Logan Horbal; Thomas Pietruszewski; Qingli Hu; Etan J Markus
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 2.899

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.