Literature DB >> 34321351

Cardiovascular responses to physical activity during work and leisure.

Tyler David Quinn1,2, Christopher E Kline2, Elizabeth Nagle2, Lewis J Radonovich3, Abdullah Alansare2,4, Bethany Barone Gibbs2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent evidence suggests that occupational physical activity (OPA) is associated with adverse cardiovascular health, whereas leisure time physical activity is protective. This study explored explanatory physiological mechanisms.
METHODS: Nineteen males (68% white, age=46.6±7.9 years, body mass index=27.9±5.1 kg/m2) with high self-reported OPA wore activity (ActiGraph and activPAL) and heart rate (HR) monitors for 7 days and an ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitor on one workday and one non-workday. Mixed effects models compared cardiovascular variables (24-hour, nocturnal, waking and non-work time HR and BP) and nocturnal HR variability (HRV) on workdays versus non-workdays. Additional models examined associations of daily activity (steps, light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA)) with cardiovascular variables. Workday by daily activity interactions were examined.
RESULTS: 24-hour and waking HR and diastolic BP as well as non-work diastolic BP were significantly higher on workdays versus non-workdays (p<0.05 for all). However, no difference in systolic BP or nocturnal HR or BP was observed between work and non-workdays (p>0.05 for all). Low-frequency and high-frequency power indices of nocturnal HRV were lower on workdays (p<0.05 for both). Daily steps and LPA were positively associated with 24-hour and waking HR on work and non-workdays. Significant interactions suggested MVPA increases HR and lowers nocturnal HRV during workdays, with the opposite effect on non-workdays.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular load was higher on workdays versus non-workdays with no compensatory hypotensive response following workdays. Daily MVPA may differentially affect ambulatory cardiovascular load and nocturnal HRV on workdays versus non-workdays, supporting the physical activity health paradox hypothesis. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  exercise; health promotion; occupational Health; physical exertion; workload

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34321351     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  2 in total

1.  Association between exposure to heavy occupational lifting and cardiac structure and function: a cross-sectional analysis from the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Authors:  Mette Korshøj; Kristoffer Grundtvig Skaarup; Mats Christian Højbjerg Lassen; Niklas Dyrby Johansen; Jacob Louis Marott; Peter Schnohr; Tor Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Isotemporal Associations of Device-Measured Sedentary Time and Physical Activity with Cardiac-Autonomic Regulation in Previously Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Abdullah Bandar Alansare; Bethany Barone Gibbs; Claudia Holzman; J Richard Jennings; Christopher E Kline; Elizabeth Nagle; Janet M Catov
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2022-07-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.