| Literature DB >> 34321043 |
Ghazala Shaheen1, Sarwat Jahan1, Nousheen Bibi2, Asmat Ullah3, Rani Faryal4, Ali Almajwal5, Tayyaba Afsar5, Dara Al-Disi5, Mahmoud Abulmeaty5, Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Khuraif6, Mohammed Arshad6, Suhail Razak7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) is a complex pregnancy hypertensive disorder with multifaceted etiology. The endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene and nitric oxide (NO) levels has been reported to be associated with PE predisposition in various populations. Therefore, present study was designed to investigate the role of NO levels and eNOS gene variants in preeclamptic women in Pakistan.Entities:
Keywords: Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene; Nitric oxide; Preeclampsia; Variants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34321043 PMCID: PMC8320179 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01213-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Clinical characteristics of controls and Preeclamptic groups
| Age (Years) | 27.017 ± 0.32 | 28.14 ± 0.42 p ≤ 0.001 | 29.17 ± 0.59 p ≤ 0.001 | 28.52 ± 0.34 0.002 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.67 ± 0.28 | 28.72 ± 0.47 p ≤ 0.001 | 28.39 ± 0.54 p ≤ 0.001 | 28.59 ± 0.360 0.047 |
| Gestational age (Weeks) | 36.32 ± 0.36 | 33.14 ± 0.48 p ≤ 0.001 | 33.08 ± 0.56 p ≤ 0.001 | 33.12 ± 0.15 p ≤ 0.001 |
| Systolic Blood Pleasure (mmHg) | 114.71 ± 0.51 | 40.39 ± 0.93 p ≤ 0.001 | 174.94 ± 2.02 p ≤ 0.001 | 154.36 ± 1.54 p ≤ 0.001 |
| Diastolic Blood Pleasure (mmHg) | 73.88 ± 0.45 | 93.10 ± 0.86 p ≤ 0.001 | 112.51 ± 1.86 p ≤ 0.001 | 100.95 ± 1.12 p ≤ 0.001 |
| Proteinuria | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 2.1 ± 0.04 p ≤ 0.001 | 2.49 ± 0.06 p ≤ 0.001 | 2.29 ± 0.05 p ≤ 0.001 |
| Infant’s weight (g)at birth | 3029.45 ± 31.31 | 2600 ± 130 p ≤ 0.001 | 22,100 ± 190 p ≤ 0.001 | 2412.5 ± 21.06 p ≤ 0.001 |
All data are reported as mean ± standard deviation with p = p value, BMI, Body mass index
Pregnancy history of control group and preeclamptic groups
| Parameters | Controls | PE with mild features | PE with severe features | Total preeclamptic women | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gravidity Primary Gravida Multiple Gravida | 177 (59) 123 (41) | 145 (77.13) 43 (22.87) p ≤ 0.001 | 80 (71.43) 32 (28.57) p ≤ 0.001 | 225 (75) 75 (25) p ≤ 0.001 | 402 (67) 198 (33) |
Preeclampsia in previous pregnancy Yes No | 15 (5) 285 (95) | 56 (29.79) 132 (70.21) p ≤ 0.001 | 28 (25) 84 (75) p ≤ 0.001 | 84 (28) 216 (72) p ≤ 0.001 | 99 (16.5) 501 (83.5) |
Preeclampsia in Family Yes No | 12 (4) 288 (96) | 43 (22.87) 145 (77.13) p ≤ 0.001 | 35 (31.25) 77 (68.75) p ≤ 0.001 | 78 (26) 222 (76) p ≤ 0.001 | 90 (15) 510 (85) |
Fig. 1Concentration of NO in controls and preeclamptic group
Genotype distribution of eNOS 894 G/T, Intron 4b/4a, -786 T/C, -2051 G/A and -1861G/A haplotypes in controls and preeclamptic groups
| Genotype and Alleles | Controls | PE with mild features | PE with severe features | Total preeclamptic women | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c.894G > T or p.(Glu298Asp) | GG | 225 (75) | 125 (66.4) | 73 (65.2) | 198 (66) |
| rs1799983 | TC | 43 (14.5) | 23 (12.3) | 14 (12.5) | 36 (12) |
| TT | 32 (10.5) | 40 (21.3) | 25 (22.3) | 66 (22)* | |
| (χ2 = 7.56, p = 0.023) | (χ2 = 6.79, P = 0.033) | (χ2 = 9.75, P = 0.008) | |||
| Allele Frequency | |||||
| G (Glu) | 493 (82.25) | 272 (72.3) | 160 (71.4) | 432 (72) | |
| T (Asp) | 107 (17.75) | 104 (27.7) | 64 (28.6) | 168 (28) | |
| (χ2 = 22.78 p ≤ 0.001) | (χ2 = 7.91, p = 0.004) | (χ2 = 11.91, p ≤ 0.001) | |||
| OR = 2.27 (1.61–3.2) | OR = 1.862 (1.20–2.88) | OR = 1.80 (1.28–2.52) | |||
| Intron 4a/4b | Bb | 272 (90.5) | 159 (84.6) | 99 (88) | 258 (86) |
| rs1722009 | Ba | 28 (9.5) | 29 (15.4) | 13 (12) | 42 (14) |
| Aa | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| (χ2 = 2.42, p = 0.08) | (χ2 = 0.37, p = 0.34) | (χ2 = 1.95, p = 0.1) | |||
| Allele Frequency | |||||
| B | 572 (95.25) | 347 (92.3) | 210 (94) | 558 (93) | |
| A | 28 (4.75) | 29 (7.7) | 14 (6) | 42 (7) | |
| (χ2 = 2.51, p = 0.08) | (χ2 = 0.43, p = 0.32) | (χ2 = 2.07, p = 0.09) | |||
| OR = 1.69 (0.87–3.26) | OR = 1.31 (0.58–2.97) | OR = 1.54 (0.85–2.82) | |||
| g.-786 T > C | TT | 204 (68) | 107 (56.9) | 63 (56) | 169 (56.5) |
| rs2070744 | TC | 79 (26.5) | 61 (32.4) | 45 (40)** | 104 (34.5)** |
| CC | 17 (5.5) | 20 (10.7)* | 4 (4) | 27 (9)* | |
| (χ2 = 7.19, P = 0.02) | (χ2 = 7.24, P = 0.02) | (χ2 = 7.84, P = 0.02) | |||
| Allele Frequency | |||||
| T | 487 (81.25) | 272 (72.3) | 170 (76) | 442 (73.75) | |
| C | 113 (18.75) | 104 (27.7) | 54 (24) | 158 (26.25) | |
| (χ2 = 6.98, p = 0.006) | (χ2 = 1.86, p = 0.1) | (χ2 = 6.45, p = 0.007) | |||
| OR = 1.65 (1.13–2.40) | OR = 1.36 (0.87–2.14) | OR = 1.54 (1.10–2.15) | |||
| g.-2051G > A | GG | 230 (76.5) | 117 (62.3) | 79 (70.5) | 196 (65.5) |
| GA | 51 (17) | 36 (19.1) | 10 (9) | 47 (15.5) | |
| AA | 19 (6.5) | 35 (18.6)** | 23 (20.5)** | 57 (19)*** | |
| (χ2 = 12.19, P = 0.002) | (χ2 = 12.16, P = 0.002) | (χ2 = 7.45, P = 0.02) | |||
| Allele Frequency | |||||
| G | 511 (85) | 270 (72) | 168 (75) | 439 (73.25) | |
| A | 89 (15) | 106 (28) | 56 (25) | 161 (26.75) | |
| (χ2 = 16.25, p < 0.001) | (χ2 = 7.01, p = 0.008) | (χ2 = 6.45, p = 0.007) | |||
| OR = 2.10 (1.49–3.25) | OR = 1.85 (1.16–2.44) | OR = 1.85 (1.17–2.94) | |||
| g.-1861G > A | GG | 212 (71) | 123 (65.4) | 78 (69.7) | 201 (67) |
| GA | 83 (27.5) | 59 (31.2) | 26 (23.2) | 85 (28.5) | |
| AA | 5 (1.5) | 6 (3.2) | 8 (7.1)* | 14 (4.5) | |
| (χ2 = 1.72, P = 0.42) | (χ2 = 5.27, P = 0.07) | (χ2 = 3.26, P = 0.19) | |||
| Allele Frequency | |||||
| G | 507 (84.75) | 305 (81.2) | 182 (81.25) | 487 (81.25) | |
| A | 93 (15.25) | 71 (18.8) | 42 (18.75) | 113 (18.75) | |
| (χ2 = 1.39, p = 0.23) | (χ2 = 0.93, p = 0.33) | (χ2 = 1.73, p = 0.18) | |||
| OR = 1.28 (0.84–1.95) | OR = 1.27 (0.77–2.08) | OR = 1.28 (0.88–1.85) |
*p ≤ 0.05 and **p ≤ 0.01 is significant for Pearson chi-square test to identify which genotype presents significant different frequencies
Fig. 2Sequence analysis of eNOS gene variants
Fig. 3Ramachandran plot. a eNOSWT, b eNOSGlu298Asp
Fig. 4Structural changes upon Glu298Asp substitution in eNOS protein. a eNOSWT protein, b eNOSMT with red colored tube represent the magnitude of fluctuation and deformation upon mutation. Amino acids colored according to the vibrational entropy change upon mutation. blue represents a rigidification of the structure and red a gain in flexibility (c) shows the atomic representation of substitution of Glu to Asp amino acid substituent indicated in cyan color. c Plot showing deformities in protein upon mutation
Fig. 5Root Mean Square Fluctuation plot of eNOS normal and mutant protein
Fig. 6Scatter plot of TF binding sites on eNOS promoter
Fig. 7DNA modeling and stacking interaction of normal and mutant DNA molecules
Fig. 8Molecular docking analysis of eNOS promoter with STAT3 and STAT6 transcription factor. a (WT) and b (mutant) represents the binding of STAT3 with eNOS promoter encompassing -786 T > C variant. Protein is shown in brown surface model while DNA in cartoon model. c (WT) and d (mutant) represents the binding of STAT6 with eNOS promoter encompassing -2015G > A variant. Protein is shown in brown surface model while DNA in cartoon model