Fekede Asefa1,2,3, Allison Cummins4, Yadeta Dessie5, Maralyn Foureur4,6, Andrew Hayen7. 1. School of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia. sinboona@gmail.com. 2. Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia. sinboona@gmail.com. 3. School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia. sinboona@gmail.com. 4. Centre for Midwifery, Child and Family Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. School of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia. 6. Hunter New England Health, Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre, University of Newcastle, Newcastle , NSW, Australia. 7. School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Gaining excessive or inadequate gestational weight is associated with many adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Inadequate gestational weight gain (GWG) increases the risk of fetal growth restriction, pre-term birth, and low birth weight. It is a public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to assess the patterns and predictors of GWG in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among pregnant women who attended antenatal care in health centres in Addis Ababa, from January to September 2019. Data were collected by a structured questionnaire and checklists and analysed using Stata version-14. Weight at or before 16 weeks gestation was used as a proxy for pre-pregnancy weight. Women's height and baseline weight were measured by data collectors, and we obtained weight at the end of the 24th and 36th weeks of gestation from women's medical records. GWG was categorized as inadequate, adequate and excessive based on the United States Institute of Medicine criteria. Predictors of GWG were identified using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 395 pregnant women were enrolled in the study. GWG was assessed for 369 (93%) women. The median GWG was 8.7 kg with inter quartile ranges (25th, 75th percentiles) of 7.0 kg and 11.6 kg. More than two-third of the participants, 248 (67.2% [95% CI: 62.2, 72.0%]), gained inadequate weight; 103 (27.9% [95% CI: 23.4, 32.8%]) gained adequate weight; and 18 (4.9% [95% CI: 2.9%, 7.6%]) gained excessive weight. Three quarters (75%) of underweight women gained inadequate gestational weight, whereas 43% of overweight or obese women gained inadequate gestational weight. Being underweight (AOR = 3.30 [95% CI: 1.32, 8.24]) or normal weight (AOR = 2.68 [95% CI: 1.37, 5.24]) before pregnancy increased the odds of gaining inadequate gestational weight compared to overweight or obese women. Not having paid employment was associated with higher odds of gaining inadequate gestational weight compared to women employed outside the home (AOR = 2.17 [95% CI: 1.16, 4.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women in Addis Ababa gain inadequate gestational weight. In particular, three quarters of underweight women gained inadequate gestational weight. Being underweight, normal weight or having no paid employment were associated with higher odds of inadequate GWG. Promoting adequate GWG in Addis Ababa among underweight and normal weight women may be an important public health initiative.
INTRODUCTION: Gaining excessive or inadequate gestational weight is associated with many adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Inadequate gestational weight gain (GWG) increases the risk of fetal growth restriction, pre-term birth, and low birth weight. It is a public health concern in sub-Saharan Africa. The aim of this study was to assess the patterns and predictors of GWG in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study among pregnant women who attended antenatal care in health centres in Addis Ababa, from January to September 2019. Data were collected by a structured questionnaire and checklists and analysed using Stata version-14. Weight at or before 16 weeks gestation was used as a proxy for pre-pregnancy weight. Women's height and baseline weight were measured by data collectors, and we obtained weight at the end of the 24th and 36th weeks of gestation from women's medical records. GWG was categorized as inadequate, adequate and excessive based on the United States Institute of Medicine criteria. Predictors of GWG were identified using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 395 pregnant women were enrolled in the study. GWG was assessed for 369 (93%) women. The median GWG was 8.7 kg with inter quartile ranges (25th, 75th percentiles) of 7.0 kg and 11.6 kg. More than two-third of the participants, 248 (67.2% [95% CI: 62.2, 72.0%]), gained inadequate weight; 103 (27.9% [95% CI: 23.4, 32.8%]) gained adequate weight; and 18 (4.9% [95% CI: 2.9%, 7.6%]) gained excessive weight. Three quarters (75%) of underweight women gained inadequate gestational weight, whereas 43% of overweight or obesewomen gained inadequate gestational weight. Being underweight (AOR = 3.30 [95% CI: 1.32, 8.24]) or normal weight (AOR = 2.68 [95% CI: 1.37, 5.24]) before pregnancy increased the odds of gaining inadequate gestational weight compared to overweight or obesewomen. Not having paid employment was associated with higher odds of gaining inadequate gestational weight compared to women employed outside the home (AOR = 2.17 [95% CI: 1.16, 4.07]). CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women in Addis Ababa gain inadequate gestational weight. In particular, three quarters of underweight women gained inadequate gestational weight. Being underweight, normal weight or having no paid employment were associated with higher odds of inadequate GWG. Promoting adequate GWG in Addis Ababa among underweight and normal weight women may be an important public health initiative.
Authors: Abdullah A Mamun; Mansey Kinarivala; Michael J O'Callaghan; Gail M Williams; Jake M Najman; Leonie K Callaway Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Lisa M Bodnar; Katherine L Wisner; Eydie Moses-Kolko; Dorothy K Y Sit; Barbara H Hanusa Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Julie Johnson; Rebecca G Clifton; James M Roberts; Leslie Myatt; John C Hauth; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Ronald J Wapner; John M Thorp; Brian M Mercer; Alan M Peaceman; Susan M Ramin; Philip Samuels; Anthony Sciscione; Margaret Harper; Jorge E Tolosa; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Antonia Restall; Rennae S Taylor; John M D Thompson; Deralie Flower; Gustaaf A Dekker; Louise C Kenny; Lucilla Poston; Lesley M E McCowan Journal: J Obes Date: 2014-06-03