Jonathan Purtle1, Katherine L Nelson1, Sarah McCue Horwitz1, Lawrence A Palinkas1, Mary M McKay1, Kimberly E Hoagwood1. 1. Department of Health Management and Policy, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia (Purtle, Nelson); Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York City (Horwitz, Hoagwood); Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (Palinkas); Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis (McKay).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mental health agencies provide critical safety net services for youths. No research has assessed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on services these agencies provide or youths they serve. This study sought to characterize agency officials' perceptions of the pandemic's impacts on youths and challenges to providing youth services during the pandemic and to examine associations between these challenges and impacts. METHODS: Surveys were completed in September-October 2020 by 159 state or county mental health agency officials from 46 states. Respondents used 7-point scales (higher rating indicated more severe impact or challenge) to rate the pandemic's impact on youth mental health issues, general service challenges, and telepsychiatry service challenges across patient, provider, and financing domains. Multiple linear regression models estimated associations between service challenges (independent variables) and pandemic impacts (dependent variables). RESULTS: Most agency officials perceived the pandemic as having disproportionately negative mental health impacts on socially disadvantaged youths (serious impact, 72%; mean rating=5.85). Only 15% (mean=4.29) perceived the pandemic as having a seriously negative impact on receipt of needed youth services. Serious service challenges were related to youths' lack of reliable equipment or Internet access for telepsychiatry services (serious challenge, 59%; mean=5.47) and the inability to provide some services remotely (serious challenge, 42%, mean=4.72). In regression models, the inability to provide some services remotely was significantly (p≤0.01) associated with three of five pandemic impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Officials perceived the COVID-19 pandemic as exacerbating youth mental health disparities but as not having a dramatic impact on receipt of needed services.
OBJECTIVE: Mental health agencies provide critical safety net services for youths. No research has assessed impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on services these agencies provide or youths they serve. This study sought to characterize agency officials' perceptions of the pandemic's impacts on youths and challenges to providing youth services during the pandemic and to examine associations between these challenges and impacts. METHODS: Surveys were completed in September-October 2020 by 159 state or county mental health agency officials from 46 states. Respondents used 7-point scales (higher rating indicated more severe impact or challenge) to rate the pandemic's impact on youth mental health issues, general service challenges, and telepsychiatry service challenges across patient, provider, and financing domains. Multiple linear regression models estimated associations between service challenges (independent variables) and pandemic impacts (dependent variables). RESULTS: Most agency officials perceived the pandemic as having disproportionately negative mental health impacts on socially disadvantaged youths (serious impact, 72%; mean rating=5.85). Only 15% (mean=4.29) perceived the pandemic as having a seriously negative impact on receipt of needed youth services. Serious service challenges were related to youths' lack of reliable equipment or Internet access for telepsychiatry services (serious challenge, 59%; mean=5.47) and the inability to provide some services remotely (serious challenge, 42%, mean=4.72). In regression models, the inability to provide some services remotely was significantly (p≤0.01) associated with three of five pandemic impacts. CONCLUSIONS: Officials perceived the COVID-19 pandemic as exacerbating youth mental health disparities but as not having a dramatic impact on receipt of needed services.
Entities:
Keywords:
Child psychiatry/general; Coronavirus/COVID-19; Public health; Public policy issues; Service delivery systems
Authors: Stephen W Patrick; Laura E Henkhaus; Joseph S Zickafoose; Kim Lovell; Alese Halvorson; Sarah Loch; Mia Letterie; Matthew M Davis Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Eileen M Condon; Amanda M Dettmer; Dylan G Gee; Cheyanne Hagan; Ka Shu Lee; Linda C Mayes; Carla S Stover; Wan-Ling Tseng Journal: Front Sociol Date: 2020-11-19
Authors: Craig S Rosen; Leslie A Morland; Lisa H Glassman; Brian P Marx; Kendra Weaver; Clifford A Smith; Stacey Pollack; Paula P Schnurr Journal: Am Psychol Date: 2020-10-29
Authors: Jonathan Purtle; Katherine L Nelson; Rebecca Lengnick-Hall; Sarah Mc Cue Horwitz; Lawrence A Palinkas; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-13 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Todd Combs; Katherine L Nelson; Douglas Luke; F Hunter McGuire; Gracelyn Cruden; Rosie Mae Henson; Danielle R Adams; Kimberly Eaton Hoagwood; Jonathan Purtle Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Lawrence A Palinkas; Jessenia De Leon; Erika Salinas; Sonali Chu; Katharine Hunter; Timothy M Marshall; Eric Tadehara; Christopher M Strnad; Jonathan Purtle; Sarah McCue Horwitz; Mary M McKay; Kimberly E Hoagwood Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 3.390