Literature DB >> 34320181

Calling differentially methylated regions from whole genome bisulphite sequencing with DMRcate.

Timothy J Peters1,2, Michael J Buckley1,2, Yunshun Chen3,4, Gordon K Smyth3,5, Christopher C Goodnow1,6, Susan J Clark1,7.   

Abstract

Whole genome bisulphite sequencing (WGBS) permits the genome-wide study of single molecule methylation patterns. One of the key goals of mammalian cell-type identity studies, in both normal differentiation and disease, is to locate differential methylation patterns across the genome. We discuss the most desirable characteristics for DML (differentially methylated locus) and DMR (differentially methylated region) detection tools in a genome-wide context and choose a set of statistical methods that fully or partially satisfy these considerations to compare for benchmarking. Our data simulation strategy is both biologically informed-employing distribution parameters derived from large-scale consortium datasets-and thorough. We report DML detection ability with respect to coverage, group methylation difference, sample size, variability and covariate size, both marginally and jointly, and exhaustively with respect to parameter combination. We also benchmark these methods on FDR control and computational time. We use this result to backend and introduce an expanded version of DMRcate: an existing DMR detection tool for microarray data that we have extended to now call DMRs from WGBS data. We compare DMRcate to a set of alternative DMR callers using a similarly realistic simulation strategy. We find DMRcate and RADmeth are the best predictors of DMRs, and conclusively find DMRcate the fastest.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34320181      PMCID: PMC8565305          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  44 in total

Review 1.  Simultaneous and selective inference: Current successes and future challenges.

Authors:  Yoav Benjamini
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.207

2.  Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance.

Authors:  J W TUKEY
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1949-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  DNA methylation and late replication probably aid cell memory, and type I DNA reeling could aid chromosome folding and enhancer function.

Authors:  A D Riggs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1990-01-30       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Comb-p: software for combining, analyzing, grouping and correcting spatially correlated P-values.

Authors:  Brent S Pedersen; David A Schwartz; Ivana V Yang; Katerina J Kechris
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  It's DE-licious: A Recipe for Differential Expression Analyses of RNA-seq Experiments Using Quasi-Likelihood Methods in edgeR.

Authors:  Aaron T L Lun; Yunshun Chen; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

6.  limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies.

Authors:  Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Genetic and molecular pathogenesis of mantle cell lymphoma: perspectives for new targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Pedro Jares; Dolors Colomer; Elias Campo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Chromatin structure and imprinting: developmental control of DNase-I sensitivity in the mouse insulin-like growth factor 2 gene.

Authors:  R Feil; M A Handel; N D Allen; W Reik
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1995

9.  WGBSSuite: simulating whole-genome bisulphite sequencing data and benchmarking differential DNA methylation analysis tools.

Authors:  Owen J L Rackham; Petros Dellaportas; Enrico Petretto; Leonardo Bottolo
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Differential methylation analysis of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing experiments using edgeR.

Authors:  Yunshun Chen; Bhupinder Pal; Jane E Visvader; Gordon K Smyth
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-11-28
View more
  3 in total

1.  Novel Zinc-Related Differentially Methylated Regions in Leukocytes of Women With and Without Obesity.

Authors:  Natália Yumi Noronha; Mariana Barato; Chanachai Sae-Lee; Marcela Augusta de Souza Pinhel; Lígia Moriguchi Watanabe; Vanessa Aparecida Batista Pereira; Guilherme da Silva Rodrigues; Déborah Araújo Morais; Wellington Tavares de Sousa; Vanessa Cristina de Oliveira Souza; Jessica Rodrigues Plaça; Wilson Salgado; Fernando Barbosa; Torsten Plösch; Carla Barbosa Nonino
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-03-07

2.  Adipose methylome integrative-omic analyses reveal genetic and dietary metabolic health drivers and insulin resistance classifiers.

Authors:  Colette Christiansen; Max Tomlinson; Melissa Eliot; Emma Nilsson; Ricardo Costeira; Yujing Xia; Sergio Villicaña; Olatz Mompeo; Philippa Wells; Juan Castillo-Fernandez; Louis Potier; Marie-Claude Vohl; Andre Tchernof; Julia El-Sayed Moustafa; Cristina Menni; Claire J Steves; Karl Kelsey; Charlotte Ling; Elin Grundberg; Kerrin S Small; Jordana T Bell
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 15.266

3.  Activation of stably silenced genes by recruitment of a synthetic de-methylating module.

Authors:  Wing Fuk Chan; Hannah D Coughlan; Yunshun Chen; Christine R Keenan; Gordon K Smyth; Andrew C Perkins; Timothy M Johanson; Rhys S Allan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 17.694

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.