| Literature DB >> 34320176 |
Franziska Taube1, Julia Annabell Georgi1, Michael Kramer1, Sebastian Stasik1, Jan Moritz Middeke1, Christoph Röllig1, Utz Krug2, Alwin Krämer3, Sebastian Scholl4, Andreas Hochhaus4, Tim H Brümmendorf5, Ralph Naumann6, Andreas Petzold7, Roger Mulet-Lazaro8, Peter J M Valk8, Björn Steffen9, Hermann Einsele10, Markus Schaich11, Andreas Burchert12, Andreas Neubauer12, Kerstin Schäfer-Eckart13, Christoph Schliemann14, Stefan W Krause15, Mathias Hänel16, Richard Noppeney17, Ulrich Kaiser18, Claudia D Baldus19, Martin Kaufmann20, Sylvia Herold21, Friedrich Stölzel1, Katja Sockel1, Malte von Bonin1, Carsten Müller-Tidow3, Uwe Platzbecker22, Wolfgang E Berdel14, Hubert Serve9, Gerhard Ehninger23, Martin Bornhäuser1,24, Johannes Schetelig1,25, Christian Thiede1,26.
Abstract
Biallelic mutations of the CEBPA gene (CEBPAbi) define a distinct entity associated with favorable prognosis; however, the role of monoallelic mutations (CEBPAsm) is poorly understood. We retrospectively analyzed 4708 adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who had been recruited into the Study Alliance Leukemia trials, to investigate the prognostic impact of CEBPAsm. CEBPA mutations were identified in 240 patients (5.1%): 131 CEBPAbi and 109 CEBPAsm (60 affecting the N-terminal transactivation domains [CEBPAsmTAD] and 49 the C-terminal DNA-binding or basic leucine zipper region [CEBPAsmbZIP]). Interestingly, patients carrying CEBPAbi or CEBPAsmbZIP shared several clinical factors: they were significantly younger (median, 46 and 50 years, respectively) and had higher white blood cell (WBC) counts at diagnosis (median, 23.7 × 109/L and 35.7 × 109/L) than patients with CEBPAsmTAD (median age, 63 years, median WBC 13.1 × 109/L; P < .001). Co-mutations were similar in both groups: GATA2 mutations (35.1% CEBPAbi; 36.7% CEBPAsmbZIP vs 6.7% CEBPAsmTAD; P < .001) or NPM1 mutations (3.1% CEBPAbi; 8.2% CEBPAsmbZIP vs 38.3% CEBPAsmTAD; P < .001). CEBPAbi and CEBPAsmbZIP, but not CEBPAsmTAD were associated with significantly improved overall (OS; median 103 and 63 vs 13 months) and event-free survival (EFS; median, 20.7 and 17.1 months vs 5.7 months), in univariate and multivariable analyses. Additional analyses revealed that the clinical and molecular features as well as the favorable survival were confined to patients with in-frame mutations in bZIP (CEBPAbZIP-inf). When patients were classified according to CEBPAbZIP-inf and CEBPAother (including CEBPAsmTAD and non-CEBPAbZIP-inf), only patients bearing CEBPAbZIP-inf showed superior complete remission rates and the longest median OS and EFS, arguing for a previously undefined prognostic role of this type of mutation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34320176 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020009680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood ISSN: 0006-4971 Impact factor: 22.113