Literature DB >> 34320161

Time to achieve delivery of nutrition targets is associated with clinical outcomes in critically ill children.

Lori J Bechard1, Steven J Staffa1, David Zurakowski1, Nilesh M Mehta1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimal nutrition in critically ill children involves a complex interplay between the doses, route, and timing of macronutrient delivery.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the association between the time to achieve delivery of 60% of the prescribed energy and protein targets and clinical outcomes in mechanically ventilated children.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study of mechanically ventilated children admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) worldwide. Daily energy and protein delivery were recorded for up to 10 d in the PICU. We calculated "adequacy" as the percentage of the prescribed energy or protein goal delivered by enteral nutrition (EN), parenteral nutrition (PN), and total nutrition (EN + PN). Based on the days required to reach 60% energy or protein adequacy after PICU admission, we categorized patients into 3 groups: early (≤3 d), pragmatic (4 to 7 d), and late (more than 7 d). The primary outcome was 60-d all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were the incidence of acquired infections and 28-d ventilator-free days (VFDs).
RESULTS: From 77 participating PICUs, 1844 patients, with a median age of 1.64 y (IQR, 0.47-7.05), were included; the 60-d mortality rate was 5.3% (n = 97). The average adequacies of delivery via EN + PN was 49% (IQR, 26-70) for energy and 66% (IQR, 44-89) for protein. In multivariable models adjusted for confounders, mortality was significantly lower in patients who achieved targets within 7 d, for energy (adjusted HR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.28-0.82; P = 0.007) or protein (adjusted HR, 0.55; 95% CI: 0.33-0.94; P = 0.027) delivery. There were no clinically significant differences in infections or VFDs between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Achieving 60% of energy or protein delivery targets within the first 7 d after PICU admission is associated with lower 60-d mortality in mechanically ventilated children, and is not associated with a greater incidence of infections or a reduction in VFDs compared to later achievement of targets. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03223038.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  critical care; early nutrition; energy adequacy; enteral nutrition; nutritional support; parenteral nutrition; pediatric intensive care unit; pediatrics; protein adequacy

Year:  2021        PMID: 34320161     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  3 in total

Review 1.  PN Administration in Critically Ill Children in Different Phases of the Stress Response.

Authors:  Koen Joosten; Sascha Verbruggen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Nutritional Support for Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Elizabeth Elliott; Michael Shoykhet; Michael J Bell; Kitman Wai
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.569

3.  Continuous Versus Intermittent Nutrition in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Karlien Veldscholte; Arnout B G Cramer; Rogier C J de Jonge; Renate D Eveleens; Koenraad F M Joosten; Sascha C A T Verbruggen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2022-06-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.