Literature DB >> 34320040

Efficacy of the Chinese version interpretation bias modification training in an unselected sample: A randomized trial.

Fan Zhang1, Chenwei Huang2, Xiaofei Mao1, Tianya Hou1, Luna Sun1, Yaoguang Zhou1, Guanghui Deng1.   

Abstract

Training individuals to interpret ambiguous information in positive ways might be an effective method of reducing social anxiety. However, little research had been carried out in Chinese samples, and the effect of interpretation training on other processes such as attentional bias also remained unclear. This study examined the effect of interpretation bias modification program (IMP) on interpretation bias, social anxiety and attentional bias, and the possible mediation effects. 51 healthy adults were randomly assigned to either a 5-session IMP training that guided them to endorse benign interpretation in ambiguous scenarios or an interpretation control condition (ICC). Self-reported measures of social anxiety symptoms, attentional bias and interpretation bias were evaluated before and after training. Results showed that compared to control group, IMP group generated more positive interpretations and less negative interpretations after training (F(1,49) = 7.65, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.14; F(1,49) = 14.60, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.23respectively). IMP yielded greater interpretation bias reduction (F(1,49) = 12.84, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.21) and social anxiety reduction (F(1,49) = 21.39, p<0.01, ηp2 = 0.30) than ICC, but change in attentional bias was not significant between IMP and the control group. Change in interpretation bias did not show a significant mediation effect in the relationship between training condition and social anxiety reduction. This study provided preliminary evidence for the efficacy of the Chinese version of IMP training. Possible methodological issues and interpretations underlying the findings were discussed. This study was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chitr.org.cn), a WHO approved registry. The title of registration trial was "A Study on the efficiency of cognitive bias and attentional bias training on fear and phobia" and the registration number was ChiCTR2100045670.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34320040     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  31 in total

Review 1.  A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety.

Authors:  Bram Van Bockstaele; Bruno Verschuere; Helen Tibboel; Jan De Houwer; Geert Crombez; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Efficacy of cognitive bias modification interventions in anxiety and depressive disorders: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liviu A Fodor; Raluca Georgescu; Pim Cuijpers; Ştefan Szamoskozi; Daniel David; Toshiaki A Furukawa; Ioana A Cristea
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 27.083

3.  Induced emotional interpretation bias and anxiety.

Authors:  A Mathews; B Mackintosh
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2000-11

4.  Cascading effects: the influence of attention bias to threat on the interpretation of ambiguous information.

Authors:  Lauren K White; Jenna G Suway; Daniel S Pine; Yair Bar-Haim; Nathan A Fox
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2011-01-27

5.  Combined "top-down" and "bottom-up" intervention for anxiety sensitivity: Pilot randomized trial testing the additive effect of interpretation bias modification.

Authors:  Daniel W Capron; Aaron M Norr; Nicholas P Allan; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals.

Authors:  Nader Amir; Jessica Bomyea; Courtney Beard
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2009-10-27

Review 7.  Attention Bias Modification (ABM): Review of Effects of Multisession ABM Training on Anxiety and Threat-Related Attention in High-Anxious Individuals.

Authors:  Karin Mogg; Allison M Waters; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26

Review 8.  Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account.

Authors:  Sonia J Bishop
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-06-05       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  A comparison of cognitive bias modification for interpretation and computerized cognitive behavior therapy: effects on anxiety, depression, attentional control, and interpretive bias.

Authors:  Jennifer O Bowler; Bundy Mackintosh; Barnaby D Dunn; Andrew Mathews; Tim Dalgleish; Laura Hoppitt
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-09-10

10.  Effects of Cognitive Bias Modification Training via Smartphones.

Authors:  Ranming Yang; Lixia Cui; Feng Li; Jing Xiao; Qin Zhang; Tian P S Oei
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.