Literature DB >> 34320007

Basking shark sub-surface behaviour revealed by animal-towed cameras.

Jessica L Rudd1, Tiago Bartolomeu2, Haley R Dolton3, Owen M Exeter3, Christopher Kerry3, Lucy A Hawkes1, Suzanne M Henderson4, Marcus Shirley5, Matthew J Witt1,3.   

Abstract

While biologging tags have answered a wealth of ecological questions, the drivers and consequences of movement and activity often remain difficult to ascertain, particularly marine vertebrates which are difficult to observe directly. Basking sharks, the second largest shark species in the world, aggregate in the summer in key foraging sites but despite advances in biologging technologies, little is known about their breeding ecology and sub-surface behaviour. Advances in camera technologies holds potential for filling in these knowledge gaps by providing environmental context and validating behaviours recorded with conventional telemetry. Six basking sharks were tagged at their feeding site in the Sea of Hebrides, Scotland, with towed cameras combined with time-depth recorders and satellite telemetry. Cameras recorded a cumulative 123 hours of video data over an average 64-hour deployment and confirmed the position of the sharks within the water column. Feeding events only occurred within a metre depth and made up ¾ of the time spent swimming near the surface. Sharks maintained similar tail beat frequencies regardless of whether feeding, swimming near the surface or the seabed, where they spent surprisingly up to 88% of daylight hours. This study reported the first complete breaching event and the first sub-surface putative courtship display, with nose-to-tail chasing, parallel swimming as well as the first observation of grouping behaviour near the seabed. Social groups of sharks are thought to be very short term and sporadic, and may play a role in finding breeding partners, particularly in solitary sharks which may use aggregations as an opportunity to breed. In situ observation of basking sharks at their seasonal aggregation site through animal borne cameras revealed unprecedented insight into the social and environmental context of basking shark behaviour which were previously limited to surface observations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34320007     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  44 in total

1.  Annual social behaviour of basking sharks associated with coastal front areas.

Authors:  D W Sims; E J Southall; V A Quayle; A M Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.

Authors:  Mark Hebblewhite; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Reproductive ecology of the reef manta ray Manta alfredi in southern Mozambique.

Authors:  A D Marshall; M B Bennett
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.051

4.  Marine anthropogenic litter on British beaches: A 10-year nationwide assessment using citizen science data.

Authors:  S E Nelms; C Coombes; L C Foster; T S Galloway; B J Godley; P K Lindeque; M J Witt
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Courtship and mating behaviour of manta rays Mobula alfredi and M. birostris in the Maldives.

Authors:  Guy M W Stevens; Julie P Hawkins; Callum M Roberts
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.051

6.  Serendipitous re-sighting of a basking shark Cetorhinus maximus reveals inter-annual connectivity between American and European coastal hotspots.

Authors:  Emmett M Johnston; Paul A Mayo; Paul J Mensink; Eric Savetsky; Jonathan D R Houghton
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.051

7.  Latent power of basking sharks revealed by exceptional breaching events.

Authors:  Emmett M Johnston; Lewis G Halsey; Nicholas L Payne; Alison A Kock; Gil Iosilevskii; Bren Whelan; Jonathan D R Houghton
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) use vision to forage on gelatinous prey in mid-water.

Authors:  Tomoko Narazaki; Katsufumi Sato; Kyler J Abernathy; Greg J Marshall; Nobuyuki Miyazaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Use of Photo-Identification and Mark-Recapture Methodology to Assess Basking Shark (Cetorhinus maximus) Populations.

Authors:  Mauvis A Gore; Peter H Frey; Rupert F Ormond; Holly Allan; Gabriella Gilkes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  From a calf's perspective: humpback whale nursing behavior on two US feeding grounds.

Authors:  Jennifer E Tackaberry; David E Cade; Jeremy A Goldbogen; David N Wiley; Ari S Friedlaender; Alison K Stimpert
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.