Literature DB >> 34320001

Computational modelling unveils how epiblast remodelling and positioning rely on trophectoderm morphogenesis during mouse implantation.

Joel Dokmegang1,2, Moi Hoon Yap1, Liangxiu Han1, Matteo Cavaliere1, René Doursat1,3.   

Abstract

Understanding the processes by which the mammalian embryo implants in the maternal uterus is a long-standing challenge in embryology. New insights into this morphogenetic event could be of great importance in helping, for example, to reduce human infertility. During implantation the blastocyst, composed of epiblast, trophectoderm and primitive endoderm, undergoes significant remodelling from an oval ball to an egg cylinder. A main feature of this transformation is symmetry breaking and reshaping of the epiblast into a "cup". Based on previous studies, we hypothesise that this event is the result of mechanical constraints originating from the trophectoderm, which is also significantly transformed during this process. In order to investigate this hypothesis we propose MG# (MechanoGenetic Sharp), an original computational model of biomechanics able to reproduce key cell shape changes and tissue level behaviours in silico. With this model, we simulate epiblast and trophectoderm morphogenesis during implantation. First, our results uphold experimental findings that repulsion at the apical surface of the epiblast is essential to drive lumenogenesis. Then, we provide new theoretical evidence that trophectoderm morphogenesis indeed can dictate the cup shape of the epiblast and fosters its movement towards the uterine tissue. Our results offer novel mechanical insights into mouse peri-implantation and highlight the usefulness of agent-based modelling methods in the study of embryogenesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34320001     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  40 in total

1.  Characterizing Inner Pressure and Stiffness of Trophoblast and Inner Cell Mass of Blastocysts.

Authors:  Xian Wang; Zhuoran Zhang; Hirotaka Tao; Jun Liu; Sevan Hopyan; Yu Sun
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Assembly of embryonic and extraembryonic stem cells to mimic embryogenesis in vitro.

Authors:  Sarah Ellys Harrison; Berna Sozen; Neophytos Christodoulou; Christos Kyprianou; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  The roles and regulation of multicellular rosette structures during morphogenesis.

Authors:  Molly J Harding; Hillary F McGraw; Alex Nechiporuk
Journal:  Development       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  Distinct intracellular Ca2+ dynamics regulate apical constriction and differentially contribute to neural tube closure.

Authors:  Makoto Suzuki; Masanao Sato; Hiroshi Koyama; Yusuke Hara; Kentaro Hayashi; Naoko Yasue; Hiromi Imamura; Toshihiko Fujimori; Takeharu Nagai; Robert E Campbell; Naoto Ueno
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis.

Authors:  Jacob M Sawyer; Jessica R Harrell; Gidi Shemer; Jessica Sullivan-Brown; Minna Roh-Johnson; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  A cell-based computational model of early embryogenesis coupling mechanical behaviour and gene regulation.

Authors:  Julien Delile; Matthieu Herrmann; Nadine Peyriéras; René Doursat
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Differential lateral and basal tension drive folding of Drosophila wing discs through two distinct mechanisms.

Authors:  Liyuan Sui; Silvanus Alt; Martin Weigert; Natalie Dye; Suzanne Eaton; Florian Jug; Eugene W Myers; Frank Jülicher; Guillaume Salbreux; Christian Dahmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  A simple mechanochemical model for calcium signalling in embryonic epithelial cells.

Authors:  K Kaouri; P K Maini; P A Skourides; N Christodoulou; S J Chapman
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-03-02       Impact factor: 2.259

Review 9.  Uterine receptivity, embryo attachment, and embryo invasion: Multistep processes in embryo implantation.

Authors:  Yamato Fukui; Yasushi Hirota; Mitsunori Matsuo; Mona Gebril; Shun Akaeda; Takehiro Hiraoka; Yutaka Osuga
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2019-05-24

10.  Self-organizing properties of mouse pluripotent cells initiate morphogenesis upon implantation.

Authors:  Ivan Bedzhov; Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  1 in total

1.  Modeling Epiblast Shape in Implanting Mammalian Embryos.

Authors:  Joel Dokmegang
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.