Julia E M Stuart1, Hannah Holland-Moritz2, Mélanie Jean3, Samantha N Miller4, José Miguel Ponciano5, Stuart F McDaniel5, Michelle C Mack4. 1. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. jms2435@nau.edu. 2. Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA. 3. Département de Biologie, Université de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada. 4. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society and Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA. 5. Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abstract
Moss-associated N2 fixation by epiphytic microbes is a key biogeochemical process in nutrient-limited high-latitude ecosystems. Abiotic drivers, such as temperature and moisture, and the identity of host mosses are critical sources of variation in N2 fixation rates. An understanding of the potential interaction between these factors is essential for predicting N inputs as moss communities change with the climate. To further understand the drivers and results of N2 fixation rate variation, we obtained natural abundance values of C and N isotopes and an associated rate of N2 fixation with 15N2 gas incubations in 34 moss species collected in three regions across Alaska, USA. We hypothesized that δ15N values would increase toward 0‰ with higher N2 fixation to reflect the increasing contribution of fixed N2 in moss biomass. Second, we hypothesized that δ13C and N2 fixation would be positively related, as enriched δ13C signatures reflect abiotic conditions favorable to N2 fixation. We expected that the magnitude of these relationships would vary among types of host mosses, reflecting differences in anatomy and habitat. We found little support for our first hypothesis, with only a modest positive relationship between N2 fixation rates and δ15N in a structural equation model. We found a significant positive relationship between δ13C and N2 fixation only in Hypnales, where the probability of N2 fixation activity reached 95% when δ13C values exceeded - 30.4‰. We conclude that moisture and temperature interact strongly with host moss identity in determining the extent to which abiotic conditions impact associated N2 fixation rates.
Moss-associated N2 fixation by epiphytic microbes is a key biogeochemical process innutrient-limited high-latitude ecosystems. Abiotic drivers, such as temperature and moisture, and the identity of host n class="Species">mosses are critical sources of variation in N2 fixation rates. An understanding of the potential interaction between these factors is essential for predicting N inputs as moss communities change with the climate. To further understand the drivers and results of N2 fixation rate variation, we obtained natural abundance values of C and N isotopes and an associated rate of N2 fixation with 15N2 gas incubations in 34 moss species collected in three regions across Alaska, USA. We hypothesized that δ15N values would increase toward 0‰ with higher N2 fixation to reflect the increasing contribution of fixed N2 in moss biomass. Second, we hypothesized that δ13C and N2 fixation would be positively related, as enriched δ13C signatures reflect abiotic conditions favorable to N2 fixation. We expected that the magnitude of these relationships would vary among types of host mosses, reflecting differences in anatomy and habitat. We found little support for our first hypothesis, with only a modest positive relationship between N2 fixation rates and δ15N in a structural equation model. We found a significant positive relationship between δ13C and N2 fixation only in Hypnales, where the probability of N2 fixation activity reached 95% when δ13C values exceeded - 30.4‰. We conclude that moisture and temperature interact strongly with host moss identity in determining the extent to which abiotic conditions impact associated N2 fixation rates.
Authors: D Richard Cutler; Thomas C Edwards; Karen H Beard; Adele Cutler; Kyle T Hess; Jacob Gibson; Joshua J Lawler Journal: Ecology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Johannes H C Cornelissen; Peter M van Bodegom; Rien Aerts; Terry V Callaghan; Richard S P van Logtestijn; Juha Alatalo; F Stuart Chapin; Renato Gerdol; Jon Gudmundsson; Dylan Gwynn-Jones; Anne E Hartley; David S Hik; Annika Hofgaard; Ingibjörg S Jónsdóttir; Staffan Karlsson; Julia A Klein; Jim Laundre; Borgthor Magnusson; Anders Michelsen; Ulf Molau; Vladimir G Onipchenko; Helen M Quested; Sylvi M Sandvik; Inger K Schmidt; Gus R Shaver; Bjørn Solheim; Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia; Anna Stenström; Anne Tolvanen; Ørjan Totland; Naoya Wada; Jeffrey M Welker; Xinquan Zhao Journal: Ecol Lett Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 9.492
Authors: Alyssa A Carrell; Max Kolton; Jennifer B Glass; Dale A Pelletier; Melissa J Warren; Joel E Kostka; Colleen M Iversen; Paul J Hanson; David J Weston Journal: Glob Chang Biol Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 10.863
Authors: Romain Darnajoux; Nicolas Magain; Marie Renaudin; François Lutzoni; Jean-Philippe Bellenger; Xinning Zhang Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 11.205