Literature DB >> 34319153

Pervasive Positive Selection on Virus Receptors Driven by Host-Virus Conflicts in Mammals.

Wenqiang Wang1, Guan-Zhu Han1.   

Abstract

Viruses hijack cellular proteins, known as viral receptors, to initiate their infections. Viral receptors are subject to two conflicting directional forces, namely, negative selection to maintain their cellular function and positive selection resulted from the ever-changing host-virus arms race. Much remains unclear about how viral receptors evolved in mammals and whether viral receptors from different mammal groups experienced different strengths of natural selection. Here, we perform evolutionary analyses of 92 viral receptors in five major orders of mammals, including Carnivora, Cetartiodactyla, Chiroptera, Primates, and Rodentia. In all five mammal orders, signals of positive selection are detected for a high proportion of viral receptors (from 41% in Carnivora to 65% in Rodentia). Many positively selected residues overlap the host-virus interaction interface. Compared with control genes, we find viral receptors underwent elevated rates of adaptive evolution in all five mammal orders, suggesting that host-virus conflicts are the main driver of the adaptive evolution of viral receptors in mammals. Interestingly, the overall strength of natural selection acting on viral receptors driven by the host-virus arms race is largely homogenous and correlated among different mammal orders, with bats and rodents, zoonosis reservoirs of importance, being unexceptional. Taken together, our findings indicate host-virus conflicts have driven the elevated rate of adaptive evolution in viral receptors across mammals and might have important implications in zoonosis surveillance and prediction. IMPORTANCE Viral receptors are cellular proteins hijacked by viruses to help their infections. A complete picture on the evolution of viral receptors in mammals is still lacking. Here, we perform a comprehensive evolutionary analysis of the evolution of 92 viral receptors in five mammal orders, including Carnivora, Cetartiodactyla, Chiroptera, Primates, and Rodentia. We find that positive selection pervasively occurred during the evolution of viral receptors, and viral receptors exhibit an elevated rate of adaptive evolution compared to that of control genes in all five mammal orders, suggesting host-virus conflicts are a major driver of the adaptive evolution of viral receptors. Interestingly, the strength of positive selection acting on viral receptors is similar among the five mammal orders. Our study might have important implications in understanding the evolution of host-virus interaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolutionary biology; phylogenetics; virus receptors; virus-host interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34319153      PMCID: PMC8482839          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01029-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  42 in total

1.  Time dependency of molecular rate estimates and systematic overestimation of recent divergence times.

Authors:  Simon Y W Ho; Matthew J Phillips; Alan Cooper; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection.

Authors:  Ben Murrell; Sasha Moola; Amandla Mabona; Thomas Weighill; Daniel Sheward; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Konrad Scheffler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The major human rhinovirus receptor is ICAM-1.

Authors:  J M Greve; G Davis; A M Meyer; C P Forte; S C Yost; C W Marlor; M E Kamarck; A McClelland
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Functional receptor molecules CD300lf and CD300ld within the CD300 family enable murine noroviruses to infect cells.

Authors:  Kei Haga; Akira Fujimoto; Reiko Takai-Todaka; Motohiro Miki; Yen Hai Doan; Kosuke Murakami; Masaru Yokoyama; Kazuyoshi Murata; Akira Nakanishi; Kazuhiko Katayama
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mouse transferrin receptor 1 is the cell entry receptor for mouse mammary tumor virus.

Authors:  Susan R Ross; Jason J Schofield; Christine J Farr; Maja Bucan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Hepatitis C Virus Entry: Protein Interactions and Fusion Determinants Governing Productive Hepatocyte Invasion.

Authors:  Gisa Gerold; Rebecca Moeller; Thomas Pietschmann
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.915

7.  Lipoprotein Receptors Redundantly Participate in Entry of Hepatitis C Virus.

Authors:  Satomi Yamamoto; Takasuke Fukuhara; Chikako Ono; Kentaro Uemura; Yukako Kawachi; Mai Shiokawa; Hiroyuki Mori; Masami Wada; Ryoichi Shima; Toru Okamoto; Nobuhiko Hiraga; Ryosuke Suzuki; Kazuaki Chayama; Takaji Wakita; Yoshiharu Matsuura
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  LSECtin interacts with filovirus glycoproteins and the spike protein of SARS coronavirus.

Authors:  Thomas Gramberg; Heike Hofmann; Peggy Möller; Patricia F Lalor; Andrea Marzi; Martina Geier; Mandy Krumbiegel; Thomas Winkler; Frank Kirchhoff; David H Adams; Stephan Becker; Jan Münch; Stefan Pöhlmann
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 3.616

9.  Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26.

Authors:  Guangwen Lu; Yawei Hu; Qihui Wang; Jianxun Qi; Feng Gao; Yan Li; Yanfang Zhang; Wei Zhang; Yuan Yuan; Jinku Bao; Buchang Zhang; Yi Shi; Jinghua Yan; George F Gao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-07-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Viral zoonotic risk is homogenous among taxonomic orders of mammalian and avian reservoir hosts.

Authors:  Nardus Mollentze; Daniel G Streicker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.