| Literature DB >> 34318412 |
Wenjun Xie1, Han Zhao2, Chang Shu3, Bin Wang1,4, Wen Zeng5, Yu Zhan6,7.
Abstract
In the present study, we aim to evaluate the delayed and cumulative effect of ozone (O3) exposure on mumps in a megacity with high population density and high humidity. We took Chongqing, a megacity in Southwest China, as the research area and 2013-2017 as the research period. A total of 49,258 confirmed mumps cases were collected from 122 hospitals of Chongqing. We employed the distributed lag nonlinear models with quasi-Poisson link to investigate the relationship between prevalence of mumps and O3 exposure after adjusting for the effects of meteorological conditions. The results show that the effect of O3 exposure on mumps was mainly manifested in the lag of 0-7 days. The single-day ;lag effect was the most obvious on the 4th day, with the relative risk (RR) of mumps occurs of 1.006 (95% CI: 1.003-1.007) per 10 μg/m3 in the O3 exposure. The cumulative RR within 7 days was 1.025 (95% CI: 1.013-1.038). Our results suggest that O3 exposure can increase the risk of mumps infection, which fills the gap of relevant research in mountainous areas with high population density and high humidity.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Cumulative exposure; Distributed lag; Mumps; O3
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34318412 PMCID: PMC8315250 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-15473-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 4.223
Fig. 1Locations of air pollutants monitoring stations and hospitals in Chongqing
Description of air pollution and meteorological factors in Chongqing, 2013–2017
| Variables a | Mean | SD b | Min | Percentiles | Max | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 50% | 75% | |||||
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 41.4 | 12.2 | 13.1 | 32.6 | 40.0 | 48.6 | 91.9 |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 19.2 | 12.2 | 4.1 | 11.0 | 15.3 | 23.6 | 78.3 |
| O3 (μg/m3) | 41.5 | 28.5 | 3.1 | 18.5 | 36.1 | 57.9 | 216.5 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 55.9 | 34.6 | 7.5 | 31.9 | 45.6 | 69.1 | 214.5 |
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 86.5 | 47.5 | 13.0 | 53.2 | 74.7 | 106.0 | 296.6 |
| CO (mg/m3) | 1.0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Temperature (°C) | 16.8 | 7.5 | -0.4 | 10.0 | 17.3 | 22.8 | 32.0 |
| Humidity (%) | 75.1 | 9.5 | 41.3 | 68.7 | 75.0 | 82.0 | 98.0 |
| Precipitation (mm) | 3.2 | 7.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 65.5 |
| Wind speed (m/s) | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 4.2 |
| Evaporation (mm) | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 3.1 | 7.2 |
| Pressure (hPa) | 953.6 | 7.8 | 927.1 | 947.5 | 953.3 | 959.8 | 976.6 |
| Sunshine duration (hour) | 3.8 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 11.5 |
aDaily average; b Standard deviation
Fig. 2Time series of mumps cases, O3 concentrations, and air temperature during 2013–2017
Fig. 3Estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs of mumps for a 10 μg/m3 increase of O3 at lag-0 to lag-7 days
Fig. 4Cumulative Relative Risk (RR) and 95% CIs of mumps for a 10 μg/m3 increase in O3 exposure
Fig. 5Estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs of mumps for a 10 μg/m3 increase of O3 at lag-0 to lag-7 days in the warm (April to September) and cool (October to March) seasons
Fig. 6Cumulative relative risk (RR) of mumps for a 10 μg/m3 increase of O3. The RR for “O3” is estimated by using the one-pollutant model. The RR for “+X” (i.e., SO2, NO2, PM2.5, and PM10) is estimated by using the two-pollutant models (Eq. 4), i.e., the RR for O3 in the presence of a second pollutant in the model
Cumulative RR of mumps in different time-series in O3 exposure
| df | Cumulative RR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1.018 | 1.006-1.029 |
| 7 | 1.025 | 1.013-1.038 |
| 8 | 1.027 | 1.015-1.039 |