Literature DB >> 34318129

Commentary: Cerebrospinal fluid drainage: One component of a successful distal aortic surgery program.

Marina Ibrahim1, Jennifer C-Y Chung1, Thomas F Lindsay2, Maral Ouzounian1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34318129      PMCID: PMC8300974          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2021.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JTCVS Tech        ISSN: 2666-2507


× No keyword cloud information.
Operative photo of repair of a thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage, together with other adjuncts, are important strategies to protect against spinal cord injury during open descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. See Article page 1. Spinal cord injury (SCI) remains the most devastating complication following descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair (DT/TAAA). Cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD), along with other protective adjuncts, have reduced the rate of permanent SCI to 5% to 8%.1, 2, 3, 4 In this issue of the Journal, Abdelbaky and colleagues present a retrospective review of 100 patients who underwent open DT/TAAA repair with CSFD as a routine adjunct, with excellent outcomes, including a permanent paraplegia rate of 2% and an in-hospital mortality rate of 6%. This success is likely secondary to several factors, including surgical expertise, routine use of other protective adjuncts, and case mix; nearly one-half of the population underwent lower-risk DT rather than TAAA repair, and the proportion of emergent patients was low. Notwithstanding the excellent results, the lack of a comparator group precludes this article from offering evidence to support or discourage the use of CSFD for SCI prevention.

Rationale for CSFD Use

Acute changes in the spinal cord occur in response to ischemia/reperfusion during distal aortic repair, resulting in edema and increased CSF pressure. CSFD works by lowering the intrathecal pressure and augmenting spinal cord perfusion. The effectiveness of CSFD in reducing SCI has been demonstrated in multiple observational series,6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and a randomized trial. Both the American Heart Association and the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery guidelines recommend CSFD for patients at high risk of SCI undergoing open and endovascular TAAA repair.

Management of CSF Drains

Although guidelines provide consensus on the use of CSF drains,12, 13, 14 the protocols for CSFD, including timing, duration, and drainage protocols, are based on institutional experience and expert opinion. Most recommend maintaining CSF pressure <10 mmHg with continuous monitoring, limiting drainage to 10-15 mL/hour, early removal within 24 to 48 hours after surgery (in the absence of SCI), and cautious use of anticoagulation therapy even after drain removal.,15, 16, 17, 18 One important learning point from the Yale series is that routine CSFD is safe, with a low incidence of serious complications.

Current and Novel Adjuncts to Spinal Cord Protection

Over the past decade, various adjunctive strategies have been introduced to minimize SCI, including distal aortic perfusion, neurophysiological monitoring, segmental artery reattachment, and aggressive blood pressure management.,, With advances in endovascular surgery, newer techniques have been proposed to increase spinal cord tolerance to hypoperfusion. Staging of aortic coverage has been suggested to stimulate the development of the collateral network for perfusion of the cord. Minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization of intercostal arteries before thoracoabdominal aortic repair has been suggested to provoke collateral flow and reduce SCI and is currently being evaluated in a randomized trial., In summary, CSFD along with other adjuncts are important strategies to protect against SCI during open descending and thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair. As with most complex aortic surgeries, it is difficult to attribute a team's success to a single factor. Rather, it is likely a combination of surgical judgment, experience, attention to management details, and a mature team that can lead to such excellent results.
  22 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Evolution of risk for neurologic deficit after descending and thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Authors:  Hazim J Safi; Anthony L Estrera; Charles C Miller; Tam T Huynh; Eyal E Porat; Ali Azizzadeh; Riad Meada; Jennifer S Goodrick
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Spinal cord perfusion protection for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Lovkesh Arora; Maen Aboul Hosn
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 4.  Spinal Cord Protection in Elective Thoracoabdominal Aortic Procedures.

Authors:  Matteo Parotto; Maral Ouzounian; George Djaiani
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Contemporary spinal cord protection during thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair: a position paper of the vascular domain of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery†.

Authors:  Christian D Etz; Ernst Weigang; Marc Hartert; Lars Lonn; Carlos A Mestres; Roberto Di Bartolomeo; Jean E Bachet; Thierry P Carrel; Martin Grabenwöger; Marc A A M Schepens; Martin Czerny
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Spinal cord deficit after 1114 extent II open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs.

Authors:  Joseph S Coselli; Susan Y Green; Matt D Price; Qianzi Zhang; Ourania Preventza; Kim I de la Cruz; Richard Whitlock; Hiruni S Amarasekara; Sandra J Woodside; Andre Perez-Orozco; Scott A LeMaire
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  A Quarter Century of Organ Protection in Open Thoracoabdominal Repair.

Authors:  Anthony L Estrera; Harleen K Sandhu; Kristofer M Charlton-Ouw; Rana O Afifi; Ali Azizzadeh; Charles C Miller; Hazim J Safi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Outcomes after endovascular versus open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: A population-based study.

Authors:  Rodolfo V Rocha; Thomas F Lindsay; Peter C Austin; Mohammed Al-Omran; Thomas L Forbes; Douglas S Lee; Maral Ouzounian
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Combined use of cerebral spinal fluid drainage and naloxone reduces the risk of paraplegia in thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair.

Authors:  C W Acher; M M Wynn; J R Hoch; P Popic; J Archibald; W D Turnipseed
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Cerebrospinal fluid drainage during thoracic aortic repair: safety and current management.

Authors:  Anthony L Estrera; Roy Sheinbaum; Charles C Miller; Ali Azizzadeh; Jon-Cecil Walkes; Taek-Yeon Lee; Larry Kaiser; Hazim J Safi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.