Commentary: Opening a window when surgeons face awesome responses to immunotherapy.

Omentum used as a pedicled flap to cover a large anterior chest wall defect after resection in a patient who underwent induction immunotherapy.

Varying tumor response patterns to immune checkpoint inhibitors have been observed. Some patients will benefit from aggressive, well-planned surgical excision and reconstruction.

See Article page 329.

Immunotherapy has profoundly changed the paradigm in the treatment of several solid tumors over the past decade. In metastatic and locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas not amenable to curative resection, immune checkpoint inhibition with cemiplimab have shown a 47% objective response rate. Another phase 2 open-label study including patients with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, showed a 44% objective response rate with cemiplimab using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1.

In many patients, the significant local response to immunotherapy and associated tumor shrinkage/contraction may change surgical planning. Some tumors considered nonamenable to curative resection, by the predicted impossibility of achieving a complete resection, patient-related clinical conditions, or the aggressiveness of the resection, have shown an impressive reduction after immunotherapy leading to a reconsideration of aggressive surgical excision.

We enthusiastically enjoyed the report by Choi and colleagues, which describes the successful resection of a large cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with chest wall and thoracic inlet invasion. Notably, after 2 cycles of cemiplimab and 1 cycle of radiotherapy, the tumor underwent a significant superficial contraction with associated new bone erosion and close contact with the subclavian vessels. The decision for aggressive resection was justified to prevent potential catastrophic bleeding.

Image-based tumor burden evaluation in patients receiving immunotherapy is sometimes challenging because the tumors can exhibit many patterns of response after delivery of treatment. Pseudoprogression and dissociated responses have been observed in many solid tumors after immunotherapy and are associated with better survival than true progression. However, tumor growth or the development of new lesions can be observed in these scenarios. Especially in cases of dissociated responses, a window for surgical treatment may open and must not be neglected. The decision to continue delivery of a drug versus proceed with aggressive surgical excision must be taken individually with consideration of the clinical features and the possibility of achieving complete resection. Biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA and chromosomal instability quantification of cell-free DNA are showing encouraging accuracy in evaluating response to immunotherapy and might be another useful tool in surgical decision making in the near future.

In the case presented by Choi and colleagues the decision to proceed with resection of such a large tumor was accompanied by the need to reconstruct the chest wall. Acellular collagen matrix patches combine rigidity and durability needed for chest stabilization, along with easy handling and strength for suture fixation. It also allows a remodeling process with tissue integration and neovascularization, which may reduce infection risk and help with healing. Because the chest wall offers significant stretch, the collagen matrix's tissue origin must be considered when selecting the prosthesis, due to the fact that the porcine origin matrix apparently offers more stretch resistance than those from humans. Prosthetic patches must always be covered with well-vascularized tissue flaps, preferentially muscle or omentum. We congratulate the authors for the surgical and oncological success in this complex case.